- Apr 23, 2015
- 8,799
- 10,386
super perfect
2019 All Star Black Infrared Air Jordan 6
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Aquamanjay_,
- Start date
- Mar 28, 2014
- 2,682
- 2,348
Lol, they always mess up on OG colorway retros. I hope they get these 6’s down better than the 2014 pair.
- Nov 21, 2012
- 7
- 12
exactly how I feel.
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- Dec 18, 2014
- 8,180
- 9,262
Hopefully I can get two. If i can only get 1 on RD, i hope resell is just as kind as the BC3 resell was/is.
- Jun 30, 2016
- 8,469
- 48,640
lol @ y'all parrots still chirping years and decades after OGs released, still whining about shape and materials and molds that are never coming back
- Mar 28, 2014
- 2,682
- 2,348
One day they will. I’m pretty sure they check on forums, videos, etc. for ideas on the next shoe. One day it’ll happen once they really run out of ideas lol
- Jun 13, 2005
- 3,018
- 1,252
Maybe my angle was bad but I thought the Maroon's had a decent shape. Please don't jump me if my opinion is bad.
I never had the originals as I wasn't alive till 9 years later and I don't have enough to purchase a well kept pair of OG's, so all I can go off of is side-by-side, similar angled photos. The differences are obviously noticeable though. But to ME, the maroon's weren't too bad.
The Maroon VI indeed had a better shape than the garbage 2014s. I was so happy too, seeing that the Maroon VI is my all time favorite shoe.
dhtowng
Supporter
- May 22, 2010
- 9,951
- 20,924
Still need another pair of maroons. They did those right.
- May 10, 2013
- 22,807
- 29,576
Love my Maroons. first pair of Jays my mom got me back in 91.
AIR J XIII
Supporter
- Nov 11, 2002
- 6,805
- 13,718
Just like Nike Air was never coming back?
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,049
- 24,223
nope. & they were only $99.99
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,049
- 24,223
slight shape differences gripes is sneaker fiend territory...sorry
materials & paint durability >>> 9999999999% accurate shape.
- Apr 23, 2015
- 8,799
- 10,386
did they?
check that ankle hole out
why bother with layers when you can just punch holes and stitch a "hole" around them?
Last edited:
- Aug 10, 2003
- 26,256
- 19,684
the jordan 3 is prally the only time where i actually prefer the retro over the OG... not feeling the slimmed down cement print and the shape just looks weird imo... i like the white cements and black cements that came out in 03 and 01... the black cements were perfect but i like the nike air on the back better on the 2018 pair but the shape looks better on the 01
Last edited:
- Apr 23, 2015
- 8,799
- 10,386
Thats because youre used to it that way.
dhtowng
Supporter
- May 22, 2010
- 9,951
- 20,924
did they?
check that ankle hole out
why bother with layers when you can just punch holes and stitch a "hole" around them?
By today’s standards they did them right IMO. Obviously not perfect and nothing beats the OG. They’re not nearly as off as the ‘18 BC3 was though. They’ve been jigging the ankle hole on 6s for a while now. Doesn’t make it right just saying. Hoping they fix that on the black infra next year.
- Apr 23, 2015
- 8,799
- 10,386
Youre right about that
AIR J XIII
Supporter
- Nov 11, 2002
- 6,805
- 13,718
I wasn't addressing worthiness of taking issue with shape discrepancies, but the idea that something can "never" come back.
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,404
- 32,765
I can’t find the video of Doug Collins talking about chewing gum until it turns to powder and Jordan is like “wipe that powder off your mouth I’m not gonna let you lose your first ballgame” WHERE IS THIS VIDEO???
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,649
- 23,642
His Airness.
- Oct 6, 2016
- 10,649
- 23,642
No it was to the Max. Sorry.
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- Dec 18, 2014
- 8,180
- 9,262
Lazy argument. Just because he didn’t see the 1998 first(you assume), that’s why he likes the 01? So if you grew up on the 88, you can’t like retros more? Seems more like allegiance based on nostalgia than actually deciding for yourself what you like more. I assume he just prefers the look of another without nostalgia bias
- Apr 23, 2015
- 8,799
- 10,386
If we had something that resembled the original 3 to compare the two we could get into this. But we havent seen anything in 30 years. But we've seen that boot cut version year in and year out since 94. Why not switch it up one good time? I dont understand the attachment to the same old.
The first design has things about it that make more sense than the edited version. As a graphic designer, the edited parts just look wrong to the original design's language.
The first design has things about it that make more sense than the edited version. As a graphic designer, the edited parts just look wrong to the original design's language.
- Aug 11, 2013
- 1,231
- 3,235
You lost me at better than 01’s... Nah
- Nov 21, 2012
- 2,392
- 1,092
Please durabuck on the toe box....no steel toe edition. Idk who the hell approved the steel toe box on the last black infrared drops.
