2019 All Star Black Infrared Air Jordan 6

[tonytobacco]

For the 91 pair, YES!!!
The 2000 tried to recreate the look. Those weren’t an all durabuck shoe that eventually had ONLY the heel lighten over time. It sounds to me like you never noticed the detail if you actually had them, and now you don’t remember.

The 2000 didnt try to recreate anything

 

[Aquamanjay_]

Y’all are going to drive me insane.

 

[tonytobacco]

lol

 

[r.a.denny]

15 pear meeenemum

 

[kickconnoisseur]

lol

that's the kinda face one smacks up with a pair of fugly cross colours colorway Jordan with Jumpman branding on the back

 

[jordan4eva23]

All I know is that original that had durabuck material, the leathery shine on the heel occur (5,6,7,8,9)

That same leathery shine occur on the heels of the 2000 Metallic 5, 2002 black/true red 7 and infrared 6 and it will occur on the DMP 6, 07 Metalics, citrus 7, Carolina 5s, 2002 chrome 6 etc.

Not as extreme as the OGs though

 

[The Fresh Prince]

 

[tonytobacco]

that's the kinda face one smacks up with a pair of fugly cross colours colorway Jordan with Jumpman branding on the back

what happens when his expression doesnt change whatsoever?

 

[kickconnoisseur]

what happens when his expression doesnt change whatsoever?

you can't change his expression but you can reshape his face Perhaps that might knock some sense in him whenever he is thinking about bringing back gimmicky Js

 

[tonytobacco]

His face is going to reshape your shoes.

 

[jordan4eva23]

Damn you aqua, you just took me back to memory lane haha... gosh I miss these
ISS don’t even exist no more

 

[Aquamanjay_]

1.

2.

3.

Other photos from the same photosets

1.

2.

3.

You chose photos with angles that didn’t show the smooth and shiny look. I hope you’re not in school to be a lawyer, because you wouldn’t be very good at it

 

[kickconnoisseur]

His face is going to reshape your shoes.

wordddd... midsoles will crack, paint peel, and the fugly jumpman brand on back will remain upon impact with Gentry

 

[tonytobacco]

Perhaps ones made in Korea were different than the ones made in Taiwan or something

 

[tonytobacco]

wordddd... midsoles will crack, paint peel, and the fugly jumpman brand on back will remain upon impact with Gentry

If it was 3s every hit would add an inch of EP to the toe

judo master gentry

 

[jordan4eva23]

Other photos from the same photosets

1.

2.

3.

You chose photos with angles that didn’t show the smooth and shiny look. I hope you’re not in school to be a lawyer, because you wouldn’t be very good at it

In the third set you can clearly see the shiny leather taking its toll, compare to the second set where it still has the durabuck texture

 

[Aquamanjay_]

Perhaps ones made in Korea were different than the ones made in Taiwan or something

Not material wise. Different production locations typically results in variation of mold, leather cuts or even colorshades. Not the materials

 

[Aquamanjay_]

I’m done arguing about what is objectively true.

 

[tonytobacco]

Perhaps they are youth sizes

 

[jordan4eva23]

When durabuck ages or is worn the below happens.
Explaining the shiny look on the toebox of a pair of 2002 chrome 6 I owned before

 

[JRepp23]

The durabuck on my pair have the same shiny leather look to them. Mine aren't D's. I would clean these after every wear. Maybe to much lol. I think it's pretty close to what the og 6 had going on. I think that's what someone a few pages back may have been trying to say. I bet these were sprayed with water repellent a dozen times.

 

[The Fresh Prince]

Perhaps they are youth sizes

Agreed, you can tell some of the photos he's using are of youth sizes

 

[Aquamanjay_]

Agreed, you can tell some of the photos he's using are of youth sizes

None of those photos are youth sizes.

Youth pairs looked like this.

 

[Aquamanjay_]

Im

The durabuck on my pair have the same shiny leather look to them. Mine aren't D's. I would clean these after every wear. Maybe to much lol. I think it's pretty close to what the og 6 had going on. I think that's what someone a few pages back may have been trying to say. I bet these were sprayed with water repellent a dozen times.

I’m not sure how’ve we’ll preserved that’s pair is, but there are countless DS untouched or cleaned pairs that aren’t shiny like that.

Even if they pair you posted is shiny, that doesn’t take away from the fact that the 91 pair was shiny IN 91, and not some recent effect of age. I’d like to think you have more intelligence than Sak who ignored my posts from 1991.

 

[JRepp23]

Im
I’m not sure how’ve we’ll preserved that’s pair is, but there are countless DS untouched or cleaned pairs that aren’t shiny like that.

Even if they pair you posted is shiny, that doesn’t take away from the fact that the 91 pair was shiny IN 91, and not some recent effect of age. I’d like to think you have more intelligence than Sak who ignored my posts from 1991.

Just because you have googled and researched more than others in here, doesn't make you the end all of material expertise. Do you know what your talking about? Yes, you do. But no one is ignorant for simply countering an observation of yours. My pair is worn and the durabuck shine to me on my pair is a result of overuse of water repellant. Could I be wrong, yeah. And if I am, then cool. Questioning peoples intelligence is not. There are several pics you posted to prove your point. Awesome. The 91 original had a shine that no other pair had. The 7s come close. At least my pair does for whatever reason. The DS pairs you posted look very different then mine do. Ive seen all your pics of the 91s.