2019 NFL Discussion Thread: StaXX talking to himself

[DADDYFATSACKS]

Perfect place for Dez Bryant.

 

[Warmachine85]

@ITO

You got some splanning to do

 

[651akathepaul]

A Bears fan sighting. Interesting. There must be some excitement surrounding them this year.

btw get that Trubisky picture the **** outa here lol

They definitely went ghost. I think one or two of them jumped ship completely and claimed to not watch football anymore.


And I hope everyone's ready for the Niners fans to come back en masse.

 

[raider5]

Everyone’s favorite stanfan bout to be walkin in here like Vince McMahon

 

[macbk]

#NotMyFellowAFCE

 

[651akathepaul]

nah

if we taking versatility rod > charles

Argument can be made for either, really. Chuck could definitely play safety though and was just as versatile in my opinion. He had his most tackles in a season in his second to last season. Rod was also mostly a free safety. Charles played both I believe. It's splitting hairs really, which is why it's hard to argue. I think Charles was also a slightly better playmaker. More sacks and forces fumbles is what helps decide it for me. Charles was very good at getting to the quarterback.

 

[Arthur Shelby]

Going 12-4 or better

 

[Deleted member 37754]

@ITO

You got some splanning to do

I'm not running the Dolphins...
NFL doesn't get what players are saying, players don't get why NFL doesn't want them to express themselves.
Neither meet in the middle, on going saga.

Exhausting.

 

[DeadsetAce]

MAGA dolphins out here, i see. hope the dolphin fans come through with the same energy and fake outrage they had last year about the Patriots

 

[Warmachine85]

MAGA dolphins out here, i see. hope the dolphin fans come through with the same energy and fake outrage they had last year about the Patriots

@ITO

I think he calling you out lol

 

[IATT]

Argument can be made for either, really. Chuck could definitely play safety though and was just as versatile in my opinion. He had his most tackles in a season in his second to last season. Rod was also mostly a free safety. Charles played both I believe. It's splitting hairs really, which is why it's hard to argue. I think Charles was also a slightly better playmaker. More sacks and forces fumbles is what helps decide it for me. Charles was very good at getting to the quarterback.

I'd take Rod as a corner and free safety over Charles, easily..

But Charles might be better for that hybrid role every team needs now, could I'd say he'd be better at the LB stuff

Like Charles is a dude I'd like to just get on the field and kinda let loose, so I'd either want his as the nickel LB or 3rd safety

 

[Warmachine85]

This Charles Woodson slander will not be tolerated. He is the GOAT point blank period. Wheres RODs heisman?

 

[651akathepaul]

I'd take Rod as a corner and free safety over Charles, easily..

But Charles might be better for that hybrid role every team needs now, could I'd say he'd be better at the LB stuff

Like Charles is a dude I'd like to just get on the field and kinda let loose, so I'd either want his as the nickel LB or 3rd safety

Yeah, but you said if we're talking versatility you would take Rod. Now you say Charles is better at a hybrid role, but does that not show he's more versatile? I think it's perfectly fair to say Rod was better, but it seemed like you said that because he was more versatile. I don't think that's the argument that puts Rod over Charles and I definitely wouldn't say it's easy.

I remember Rod as being a tougher defender than Charles. A play it straight up, knock you in the mouth, physical player. Charles wasn't that. He was more finesse and his sacks were more craft than it was physicality. Both got the job done, but in different ways.

 

[DeadsetAce]

@ITO

I think he calling you out lol

@ITO
Bantz Lord T

 

[IATT]

Even the team everyone thought was the most MAGA ain't go this far.. couple teams really fighting for the title

When we going hear from jerruh and the Texans dude????

Been a while

 

[IATT]

Yeah, but you said if we're talking versatility you would take Rod. Now you say Charles is better at a hybrid role, but does that not show he's more versatile? I think it's perfectly fair to say Rod was better, but it seemed like you said that because he was more versatile. I don't think that's the argument that puts Rod over Charles and I definitely wouldn't say it's easy.

Just mean as a DB.. Charles is more a playmaker but there were a decent amount of guys better than him as CB and then there were the pure safety guys he definitely ain't over

Rod was great at both spots

 

[Warmachine85]

Just mean as a DB.. Charles is more a playmaker but there were a decent amount of guys better than him as CB and then there were the pure safety guys he definitely ain't over

Rod was great at both spots

Name 5 guys better at CB than chuck. Jerk

 

[Bantz Lord T]

This comes as bit of a surprise to me, Stephen Ross seemed to be a bit more progressive than the Jurrah types.

 

[IATT]

Name 5 guys better at CB than chuck. Jerk

Rod woodson
Deion Saunders
Darrell green
Revis
Champ

Shhh nnamdi was a better CB til the wheels came off

 

[junglejim]

Going 12-4 or better

Today, Jimmy G became Jimmy D. Let that man get his **** on

 

[Warmachine85]

Rod woodson
Deion Saunders
Darrell green
Revis
Champ

Shhh nnamdi was a better CB til the wheels came off

Revis no green no nnamdi? ok im done with you good day sir

 

[IATT]

Revis no green no nnamdi? ok im done with you good day sir

wanna guess which CB teams picked on when nnamdi and Charles were a tandem?

 

[Warmachine85]

wanna guess which CB teams picked on when nnamdi and Charles were a tandem?

Wanna guess why nnamdi fell off planet earth he was a one trick pony. Cant be the goat when your only good at one thing.

 

[Deleted member 37754]

MAGA dolphins out here, i see. hope the dolphin fans come through with the same energy and fake outrage they had last year about the Patriots

F-ck the Patriots.

 

[Deleted member 37754]

@ITO

I think he calling you out lol

He's not. He's much smarter than he looks.