48÷2(9+3) = ???

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Yeah he offed himself with that one.

  

 you guys are quick to twist peoples words into what ever pleases you guys no wonder why you continue manipulating the problem.

According to you team 2 members the division symbol creates implied parenthesis around 2 parts of the problem making this problem (4 / (2(9+3)) because the division symbol is "different" than / . I am asking you where did you see that rule at. I am asking for your source but of course you will not provide any source because you realized you were wrong about 40 pages ago but you still try to prove yourself right.

You're still at it? Should I quote you again from the last page?

did you even read what i just wrote? that was a explanation of what i wrote seriously you need to be demodded you are the dumbest herb ive met on here you cant even argue in a proper manner.

 

[joe billionaire]

yall still on this?

 

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Yeah he offed himself with that one.

  

 you guys are quick to twist peoples words into what ever pleases you guys no wonder why you continue manipulating the problem.

According to you team 2 members the division symbol creates implied parenthesis around 2 parts of the problem making this problem (4 / (2(9+3)) because the division symbol is "different" than / . I am asking you where did you see that rule at. I am asking for your source but of course you will not provide any source because you realized you were wrong about 40 pages ago but you still try to prove yourself right.

You're still at it? Should I quote you again from the last page?

did you even read what i just wrote? that was a explanation of what i wrote seriously you need to be demodded you are the dumbest herb ive met on here you cant even argue in a proper manner.

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast



  

 you guys are quick to twist peoples words into what ever pleases you guys no wonder why you continue manipulating the problem.

According to you team 2 members the division symbol creates implied parenthesis around 2 parts of the problem making this problem (4 / (2(9+3)) because the division symbol is "different" than / . I am asking you where did you see that rule at. I am asking for your source but of course you will not provide any source because you realized you were wrong about 40 pages ago but you still try to prove yourself right.

You're still at it? Should I quote you again from the last page?

did you even read what i just wrote? that was a explanation of what i wrote seriously you need to be demodded you are the dumbest herb ive met on here you cant even argue in a proper manner.

This coming from a guy who posted...

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-
Keep going.

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast



  

 you guys are quick to twist peoples words into what ever pleases you guys no wonder why you continue manipulating the problem.

According to you team 2 members the division symbol creates implied parenthesis around 2 parts of the problem making this problem (4 / (2(9+3)) because the division symbol is "different" than / . I am asking you where did you see that rule at. I am asking for your source but of course you will not provide any source because you realized you were wrong about 40 pages ago but you still try to prove yourself right.

You're still at it? Should I quote you again from the last page?

did you even read what i just wrote? that was a explanation of what i wrote seriously you need to be demodded you are the dumbest herb ive met on here you cant even argue in a proper manner.

This coming from a guy who posted...

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-
Keep going.

 

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

You're still at it? Should I quote you again from the last page?

did you even read what i just wrote? that was a explanation of what i wrote seriously you need to be demodded you are the dumbest herb ive met on here you cant even argue in a proper manner.

This coming from a guy who posted...

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-
Keep going.

This guy you arent even answering my question. I clearly explained what I meant by the question and you STILL wont answer it. WHERE did you find that the division symbol creates 2 seperate terms in the problem creating this problem into a fraction. You are to stubborn to read and prove yourself you have prove this over and over.

 

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

You're still at it? Should I quote you again from the last page?

did you even read what i just wrote? that was a explanation of what i wrote seriously you need to be demodded you are the dumbest herb ive met on here you cant even argue in a proper manner.

This coming from a guy who posted...

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-
Keep going.

This guy you arent even answering my question. I clearly explained what I meant by the question and you STILL wont answer it. WHERE did you find that the division symbol creates 2 seperate terms in the problem creating this problem into a fraction. You are to stubborn to read and prove yourself you have prove this over and over.

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast



did you even read what i just wrote? that was a explanation of what i wrote seriously you need to be demodded you are the dumbest herb ive met on here you cant even argue in a proper manner.

This coming from a guy who posted...

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-
Keep going.

This guy you arent even answering my question. I clearly explained what I meant by the question and you STILL wont answer it. WHERE did you find that the division symbol creates 2 seperate terms in the problem creating this problem into a fraction. You are to stubborn to read and prove yourself you have prove this over and over.

What?

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast



did you even read what i just wrote? that was a explanation of what i wrote seriously you need to be demodded you are the dumbest herb ive met on here you cant even argue in a proper manner.

This coming from a guy who posted...

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-
Keep going.

This guy you arent even answering my question. I clearly explained what I meant by the question and you STILL wont answer it. WHERE did you find that the division symbol creates 2 seperate terms in the problem creating this problem into a fraction. You are to stubborn to read and prove yourself you have prove this over and over.

What?

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-

 

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31


This coming from a guy who posted...

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-
Keep going.

This guy you arent even answering my question. I clearly explained what I meant by the question and you STILL wont answer it. WHERE did you find that the division symbol creates 2 seperate terms in the problem creating this problem into a fraction. You are to stubborn to read and prove yourself you have prove this over and over.

What?

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-

Typical Team 2 ALWAYS avoiding questions
  

 

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31


This coming from a guy who posted...

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-
Keep going.

This guy you arent even answering my question. I clearly explained what I meant by the question and you STILL wont answer it. WHERE did you find that the division symbol creates 2 seperate terms in the problem creating this problem into a fraction. You are to stubborn to read and prove yourself you have prove this over and over.

What?

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-

Typical Team 2 ALWAYS avoiding questions
  

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast



This guy you arent even answering my question. I clearly explained what I meant by the question and you STILL wont answer it. WHERE did you find that the division symbol creates 2 seperate terms in the problem creating this problem into a fraction. You are to stubborn to read and prove yourself you have prove this over and over.

What?

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-

Typical Team 2 ALWAYS avoiding questions
  

You come up with the DUMBEST questions that's why.


Huh?

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast



This guy you arent even answering my question. I clearly explained what I meant by the question and you STILL wont answer it. WHERE did you find that the division symbol creates 2 seperate terms in the problem creating this problem into a fraction. You are to stubborn to read and prove yourself you have prove this over and over.

What?

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-

Typical Team 2 ALWAYS avoiding questions
  

You come up with the DUMBEST questions that's why.


Huh?

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-

 

[usainboltisfast]

Coming from the idiot who adds parenthesis in the problems that are there, the person who thinks you multiply before you divide, the person who thinks you can distribute and get 1 term, the person who thinks you can't distribute in the problem and get the correct answer. You have flip flopped so much in this thread and keep changing how you think the answe is solved.Pot calling the kettle black much?

 

[usainboltisfast]

Coming from the idiot who adds parenthesis in the problems that are there, the person who thinks you multiply before you divide, the person who thinks you can distribute and get 1 term, the person who thinks you can't distribute in the problem and get the correct answer. You have flip flopped so much in this thread and keep changing how you think the answe is solved.Pot calling the kettle black much?

 

[seasoned vet]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Coming from the idiot who adds parenthesis in the problems that are there, the person who thinks you multiply before you divide, the person who thinks you can distribute and get 1 term, the person who thinks you can't distribute in the problem and get the correct answer. You have flip flopped so much in this thread and keep changing how you think the answe is solved. Pot calling the kettle black much?

....tsk, tsk. THAT will get you banned.
 
 
 

 

[seasoned vet]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Coming from the idiot who adds parenthesis in the problems that are there, the person who thinks you multiply before you divide, the person who thinks you can distribute and get 1 term, the person who thinks you can't distribute in the problem and get the correct answer. You have flip flopped so much in this thread and keep changing how you think the answe is solved. Pot calling the kettle black much?

....tsk, tsk. THAT will get you banned.
 
 
 

 

[usainboltisfast]

Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.

> 2*(3+4);

> 2^(3*4);

> 2/(3/3);

If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.

http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html

Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

1. Coming from the idiot who adds parenthesis in the problems that are there, 

2. the person who thinks you multiply before you divide, 

3. the person who thinks you can distribute and get 1 term, 

4. the person who thinks you can't distribute in the problem and get the correct answer. 

5. You have flip flopped so much in this thread and keep changing how you think the answe is solved.Pot calling the kettle black much?
1. You added the extra ( ), not me. Read my notes again. I NEVER added extra ( ) to any of the problems.


2. When did I ever say that? NEVER.

3. You can't? Especially when there are no variables involved?

4. Did you really post this after question number 3?

5. Flip-flop? I posted ONLY ONE way to do it unlike you TEAM 288'ers.

Okay!

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

1. Coming from the idiot who adds parenthesis in the problems that are there, 

2. the person who thinks you multiply before you divide, 

3. the person who thinks you can distribute and get 1 term, 

4. the person who thinks you can't distribute in the problem and get the correct answer. 

5. You have flip flopped so much in this thread and keep changing how you think the answe is solved.Pot calling the kettle black much?
1. You added the extra ( ), not me. Read my notes again. I NEVER added extra ( ) to any of the problems.


2. When did I ever say that? NEVER.

3. You can't? Especially when there are no variables involved?

4. Did you really post this after question number 3?

5. Flip-flop? I posted ONLY ONE way to do it unlike you TEAM 288'ers.

Okay!

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-

 

[usainboltisfast]

Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.

> 2*(3+4);

> 2^(3*4);

> 2/(3/3);

If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.

http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html

Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.

> 2*(3+4);

> 2^(3*4);

> 2/(3/3);

If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.

http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html

Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.
Doesn't prove anything. It clearly says "TO FORCE A DIFFERENT EVALUATION ORDER."
Do you even understand the stuff you read online?

My goodness.

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.

> 2*(3+4);

> 2^(3*4);

> 2/(3/3);

If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.

http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html

Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.
Doesn't prove anything. It clearly says "TO FORCE A DIFFERENT EVALUATION ORDER."
Do you even understand the stuff you read online?

My goodness.

 

[bc2310]

From another forum:
There are two interpretations of the equation:

1. That the multiplication of 2(9+3) carries precedence over the 48 being against the bracket (answer is 2)

and

2. That the true function before the bracket is 48/2 (answer is 28

Which is correct?

This is apparently a mathematical quandry that math nerds joke about over lunch....the interpretation of the statement is ambiguous.

 

[bc2310]

From another forum:
There are two interpretations of the equation:

1. That the multiplication of 2(9+3) carries precedence over the 48 being against the bracket (answer is 2)

and

2. That the true function before the bracket is 48/2 (answer is 28

Which is correct?

This is apparently a mathematical quandry that math nerds joke about over lunch....the interpretation of the statement is ambiguous.