48÷2(9+3) = ???

[young718chris]

/thread

Sheesh

 

[young718chris]

/thread

Sheesh

 

[solemunchies]

How did this go for 129 pages and why are people going nuts? What'd I miss?

 

[solemunchies]

How did this go for 129 pages and why are people going nuts? What'd I miss?

 

[seasoned vet]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.

> 2*(3+4);

> 2^(3*4);

> 2/(3/3);

If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.

http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html

Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.


  
- but......
 

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?

- though.
 
 

 

[seasoned vet]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.

> 2*(3+4);

> 2^(3*4);

> 2/(3/3);

If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.

http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html

Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.


  
- but......
 

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?

- though.
 
 

 

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.

> 2*(3+4);

> 2^(3*4);

> 2/(3/3);

If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.

http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html

Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.

Doesn't prove anything. It clearly says "TO FORCE A DIFFERENT EVALUATION ORDER."
Do you even understand the stuff you read online?

My goodness.

I understand English isn't your first language but you fail at reading you didn't even copy the whole sentence. The only way you can force an equation out of it's normal order of operations is by adding parenthesis. You still think 48/2(12) is the same 48/(2(12))

 

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.

> 2*(3+4);

> 2^(3*4);

> 2/(3/3);

If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.

http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html

Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.

Doesn't prove anything. It clearly says "TO FORCE A DIFFERENT EVALUATION ORDER."
Do you even understand the stuff you read online?

My goodness.

I understand English isn't your first language but you fail at reading you didn't even copy the whole sentence. The only way you can force an equation out of it's normal order of operations is by adding parenthesis. You still think 48/2(12) is the same 48/(2(12))

 

[julian wright]

I can't believe this hit 130 pages. Should've ended on the first reply. Someone post some porn and get this locked up

 

[julian wright]

I can't believe this hit 130 pages. Should've ended on the first reply. Someone post some porn and get this locked up

 

[bc2310]

Whatever team the porn poster is on would take the L 

 

[i flipzkickz i]

130 pages? The answer is 288. Seriously guys.

Take care of the parenthesis first, then you have to go left to right in the equation. You can't go backwards after you solve the parenthesis part.

 

[i flipzkickz i]

130 pages? The answer is 288. Seriously guys.

Take care of the parenthesis first, then you have to go left to right in the equation. You can't go backwards after you solve the parenthesis part.

 

[bc2310]

Whatever team the porn poster is on would take the L 

 

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by seasoned vet

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.

> 2*(3+4);

> 2^(3*4);

> 2/(3/3);

If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.

http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html

Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.

  
- but......
 

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?

- though.
 
 

Let me guess you think the division symbol is the same as the fraction bar. The division in this problemsays you are dividing 48 into the next term to the right of it not divding into ALL the terms to the right of it

 

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by seasoned vet

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Speaking of parentheses, you can override Maple's precedence rules by using parentheses to group expressions in the order that you wish Maple to evaluate them. Here are some examples where we use parentheses to force a different evaluation order than Maple would otherwise use.

> 2*(3+4);

> 2^(3*4);

> 2/(3/3);

If you have any doubt, use parentheses to make usre Maple executes your expressions in the order in which you intend.

http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html

Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.

  
- but......
 

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?

- though.
 
 

Let me guess you think the division symbol is the same as the fraction bar. The division in this problemsays you are dividing 48 into the next term to the right of it not divding into ALL the terms to the right of it

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html

Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.

Doesn't prove anything. It clearly says "TO FORCE A DIFFERENT EVALUATION ORDER."
Do you even understand the stuff you read online?

My goodness.

I understand English isn't your first language but you fail at reading you didn't even copy the whole sentence. The only way you can force an equation out of it's normal order of operations is by adding parenthesis. 

Okay Shakespeare.

You still think 48/2(12) is the same 48/(2(12))

When did I say that? The original problem is 48÷2(9+3), NOT 48/2(12).

Look!

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-

And

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10758580/48-2-9-3-

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html

Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.

Doesn't prove anything. It clearly says "TO FORCE A DIFFERENT EVALUATION ORDER."
Do you even understand the stuff you read online?

My goodness.

I understand English isn't your first language but you fail at reading you didn't even copy the whole sentence. The only way you can force an equation out of it's normal order of operations is by adding parenthesis. 

Okay Shakespeare.

You still think 48/2(12) is the same 48/(2(12))

When did I say that? The original problem is 48÷2(9+3), NOT 48/2(12).

Look!

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-

And

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10758580/48-2-9-3-

 

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Doesn't prove anything. It clearly says "TO FORCE A DIFFERENT EVALUATION ORDER."
Do you even understand the stuff you read online?

My goodness.

I understand English isn't your first language but you fail at reading you didn't even copy the whole sentence. The only way you can force an equation out of it's normal order of operations is by adding parenthesis. 

Okay Shakespeare.

You still think 48/2(12) is the same 48/(2(12))

When did I say that? The original problem is 48÷2(9+3), NOT 48/2(12).

Look!

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-

And

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10758580/48-2-9-3-

You still think there is a difference between them! Like I said show proof that shows there is a difference. I already posted info that states otherwise so why can't you do the same?

 

[usainboltisfast]

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by kingcrux31

Doesn't prove anything. It clearly says "TO FORCE A DIFFERENT EVALUATION ORDER."
Do you even understand the stuff you read online?

My goodness.

I understand English isn't your first language but you fail at reading you didn't even copy the whole sentence. The only way you can force an equation out of it's normal order of operations is by adding parenthesis. 

Okay Shakespeare.

You still think 48/2(12) is the same 48/(2(12))

When did I say that? The original problem is 48÷2(9+3), NOT 48/2(12).

Look!

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10757645/48-2-9-3-

And

http://niketalk.yuku.com/sreply/10758580/48-2-9-3-

You still think there is a difference between them! Like I said show proof that shows there is a difference. I already posted info that states otherwise so why can't you do the same?

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by seasoned vet

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html

Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.

  
- but......
 

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?

- though.
 
 

Let me guess you think the division symbol is the same as the fraction bar. The division in this problemsays you are dividing 48 into the next term to the right of it not divding into ALL the terms to the right of it

Again!

This is too much.

 

[kingcrux31]

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Originally Posted by seasoned vet

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

http://www.cs.utah.edu/~zachary/isp/worksheets/operprec/operprec.html

Again here is more proof that state the term 2(12) needs another set of parenthesis if they are to be done before division.

  
- but......
 

Originally Posted by usainboltisfast

Where exactly did you read that the division symbol = fraction?

- though.
 
 

Let me guess you think the division symbol is the same as the fraction bar. The division in this problemsays you are dividing 48 into the next term to the right of it not divding into ALL the terms to the right of it

Again!

This is too much.

 

[throwback1718]

ya'll are ridiculous.

 

[throwback1718]

ya'll are ridiculous.

 

[kn0wledgeable]

c'mon man lock this up already. it was fun at first but now meh