- 5,850
- 2,770
If I was selling I would say no. If I was buying I would say yes. But that is all on you.
$325 for Mystery Greys(12.5) too much? I honestly can't find this size(or even 13) anywhere else.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If I was selling I would say no. If I was buying I would say yes. But that is all on you.
$325 for Mystery Greys(12.5) too much? I honestly can't find this size(or even 13) anywhere else.
yoooo lmao. adidas with the phallus knitsWith this disagreement with 2.0 and 3.0, at the end of the day we still love UBs. Its just a matter of choosing between d*ck head or balls sack.
ha damn.. I remember when i ooped for a NT user here MG for retail + ship.
$325 for Mystery Greys(12.5) too much? I honestly can't find this size(or even 13) anywhere else.
If I was selling I would say no. If I was buying I would say yes. But that is all on you.
I think so... I'd shop around. They shouldn't be going for 3M prices.
$325 for Mystery Greys(12.5) too much? I honestly can't find this size(or even 13) anywhere else.
2.0 is probably cheaper to make than 1.0 so it would explain why they are shoving it down our throats lol
3.0 is def way better than the 2.0.
Gradients still suck guys, nothing has changed.
You've all just convinced yourselves to like gradients cause it's all they're giving us.
Damn then ADC probably came up on the Olympic pack.
2.0 is probably cheaper to make than 1.0 so it would explain why they are shoving it down our throats lol
Matching aside, depending on how used is your versus the traded pair it's a good trade. That is if you don't care about unDSing your creams.For those of you who have the olive UBs, are they easy to match with clothes? I was just offered to trade my pair of used creams for olives in the same condition. I already have one pair of DS creams but they're easily my favorite colorway though! Any opinions?
I think so... I'd shop around. They shouldn't be going for 3M prices.
Matching aside, depending on how used is your versus the traded pair it's a good trade. That is if you don't care about unDSing your creams.
2.0 is probably cheaper to make than 1.0 so it would explain why they are shoving it down our throats lol
Most likely, I'm sure they negotiated pretty good pricing for the leather trim on the gold UBs and bent the factory over on margins for the silver and gold foil cups. Hence all the factory flaws lol
Damn then ADC probably came up on the Olympic pack.
I was looking at those but $325 is too much and the seller doesn't respond to messages. I'm looking for a pair in the $225 - $250 range, $275 at most.
$325 for Mystery Greys(12.5) too much? I honestly can't find this size(or even 13) anywhere else.
either way, ADC is sorta winning. Hard to tell because I have returned so much of their LTDs etc back to them
Most likely, I'm sure they negotiated pretty good pricing for the leather trim on the gold UBs and bent the factory over on margins for the silver and gold foil cups. Hence all the factory flaws lol
you have a habit of making these baseless, illogical claims huh?
Most likely, I'm sure they negotiated pretty good pricing for the leather trim on the gold UBs and bent the factory over on margins for the silver and gold foil cups. Hence all the factory flaws lol
for real thoughif MGs are selling for $325, then its time to get rid of my pair
Got shipping for mine today
I compared the knit patterns of the 1.0 to the 2.0. There about 3 different weave patterns on the toe box and vamp. To me it looks like high density/high pic. This is more expensive and time consuming to weave because you are using more yarn in the same space. The quarter piece is also a separate piece that is sewed together with the toe/vamp.what on Gods green earth would make you think that 2.0 is any cheaper to produce than 1.0?
I know, that sounded really dumb so I removed it lol I started geeking a little bit.Loom knowledgelol
I know, that sounded really dumb so I removed it lol I started geeking a little bit.
I compared the knit patterns of the 1.0 to the 2.0. There about 3 different weave patterns on the toe box and vamp. To me it looks like high density/high pic. This is more expensive and time consuming to weave because you are using more yarn in the same space. The quarter piece is also a separate piece that is sewed together with the toe/vamp.
The 2.0 still have a thick overall fabric but it only looks like 2 different weave patterns and the yarn is a normal density with lower pic. The whole upper is one piece of PK which cuts costs on assembly.
Just my $0.02, the factors driving cost for these types of fabrications can differ depending on small changes in production methods so its not absolute.