ADIDAS BOOST Thread - PAGE 1 for INFO- *NO BUYING/SELLING/TRADING*

How many 3.0s have you copped this year?

  • 0

    Votes: 17 22.1%

  • 1-2

    Votes: 33 42.9%

  • 3+

    Votes: 27 35.1%
  • Total voters
    77
  • Poll closed .
Show All
Hypebeast917 said:
 
Because they're ugly? I don't know how to explain trash.
Click to expand...
roll.gif
 
I'm not sure what's funnier... The Teddy love, or the Teddy hate lol. I've seen him call plenty of Adidas shoes a no cop for him. I think the reason some people get the "everything is fire" vibe from him is that he's getting the shoes HE thinks are fire. He doesn't bring a whole lot of shoes he isn't going to wear, which makes sense to me anyway.

Dude is doing what anyone here would do if they had an opportunity. Now his fanboi's on the other hand, that's a different story. Dude ain't signing my chit either :lol:
 
If Mr Boostman was getting paid by adidas I'd understand. But dudes not even getting a penny. I think it was like a month ago when he got his first package from them (White EQT)
 
This all Teaddy talk got me so fed up ... thinking in flagging every post related with the guy lol 
 
The Haven design is too forced, if that makes sense.  Too much going on in one design.  Uncaged, Black Boost, ATR striping, 3M, Leather, etc.  
 
Last edited:
tokub said:
 
any width differences between RC mens and womens? 
Click to expand...
No. Spoke at length with rep at adidas flagship regarding this before I picked up my pair. I tried on an 11 and it was too big, I purchased a 10.5 and didn't try on. Only difference is conversion of sizing.
 
reigning said:
 
The Haven design is too forced, if that makes sense.  Too much going on in one design.
Click to expand...
that's how i feel about the  EQT 93/17 Boost tho ... but they ain't awful like the havens 

To think that you can screw an all black shoe 
 
DesD1 said:
 
that's how i feel about the  EQT 93/17 Boost tho ... but they ain't awful like the havens 

To think that you can screw an all black shoe 
Click to expand...
I tend to agree about the 93/17's.  BUT, and a huge BUT - with how comfortable the 93/17's are, I don't care what they look like.
 
The Havens look like a Zara knock off version of an Ultra Boost, I really don't get the hype, well yes I do, it's a limited consortium ultra boost. I mean if anyone gets these, they'd be great for beaters but that's about it in my eyes, nothing special at all.
 
Havens are cool to me, but nothing spectacular. Most ultra boost collabs look like gr's besides a couple imo.
 
I think most of the hate for Havens comes from the ugly and excessively long 3M laces. 3M doesnt go with everything and if you ditch em for shorter blacktip laces (mine are off my gf's RC Pureboost) they transform the shoe Imo. ATR stripping adds a little "contrast" too. And yeah a little bit of the appeal for me is it is the first uncaged 2.0 and monochrome 2.0 knit which suddenly makes it a lot more appealing lol
 
Does anyone have in hand or on fee photos of the RC 2/3.0?  My bid on stockx got accepted (after my free shipping expired :/) so I'm trying to decide if I want to keep it once I get it in.  $25 shipping kills me every time with that damn site.
 
the strip on the Havens going from the heel cup around the toe, like whats on the kiths, is what really caught my attention and liked. Plus its uncaged without a sock upper. Its one of the more unique collabs for me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest News

View All News

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

Site contents may not be incorporated into AI training data or any other derivative works without prior express written consent.

Links to participating merchants may generate referral or affiliate commissions that help support our community. See our policies for details. NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom