- 5,336
- 12,714
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2015
Anyone seen NG's under $500 shipped for a 10.5? I know these little Timmys can't hold out but so long.
just wait a week
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Anyone seen NG's under $500 shipped for a 10.5? I know these little Timmys can't hold out but so long.
What happens if a seller on stockX doesn't ship a ship within the allotted 2 business days?
Oh yes, now I remember that in the beginning.Yeah Game Royals, sorry they were originally coined Blue Chi's then Game Royals closer to release. I think most people recognize them with the Blue Chi name > Game Royals.
Thank you man. We just getting old. I totally remember that shoe being hyped because it was a blue chi.Yes Blue Chicago's which is what they were supposed to be then they got a Black tongue lol. They are exactly that. Maybe some are forgetting but he's not tripping. I also don't think any of the OG Metallics are better than some retro plus' so I beg to differ on that when it comes to I's.
But generally I would usually agree that the OG is always better than a Retro +
Nah metallics are worse than a lot of retro + color waysAny OG colorway > a retro + colorway
Had to google them but Game Royals are garbage. No brainer to trade for NG's.
yup....ltrain dubbed em “struggle frags”Thank you man. We just getting old. I totally remember that shoe being hyped because it was a blue chi.
I even remember the many frag customs that we created with that shoe as a base.
Nah metallics are worse than a lot of retro + color ways
Metallic’s were nothing special. Always bargain bin material.Nah metallics are worse than a lot of retro + color ways
they really are. do-it all, get better with age, timeless.Navy Metallics are phenomenal.
Nah metallics are worse than a lot of retro + color ways
red metallics are in the top 5 1s categorythey really are. do-it all, get better with age, timeless.
They’re definitely clean, but not for me personally lolOh hells no! Stop that. Classic simplicity >
We'll have to agree to disagree.
Those the lows?
Can’t even see the shoes smh
Those the lows?