- 442
- 156
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2012
Probably gonna get those NA Barons as a consolation for sleeping on these
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
What long-term profits? The only ones profiting are resellers. The brand could make more money if they released more pairs to the public. Stop this limited amount crap.
Definitely I agree with you on that. I'm the same way about not caring about what others purchase. But we don't represent the majority of people. Hypebeasts and others will buy a shoe just because it's hyped and exclusive so they can get their IG likes and social media awards and so forth. It's just the way it is. People want the name and fame, not the actual sneaker and what it means.The thought of people actually caring about what others purchase and wear is silly. "I don't want to have the same shoes on as so and so." Goofy. I still think that even if shoes were mass produced they would still get sold.
picking up a 2009 pair DS for 200 today. very hyped. had the 09's and beat them into the ground, cant wait to do it again
Someone who appreciates the really slept on 2009. Love mine.
Yeah quality on the '09 shadows were amazing. I just wore my pair to run some errands this morning. They're beat up but I rock em like some Gucci loafers
Someone who appreciates the really slept on 2009. Love mine.
quality puts any from 2013 to shame, and the jumpman doesnt bother me at all. been on the hunt for 2013s but lucked into these. trigger pulled immediately
hurts that i had to shell out 2 bills for these, when i originally copped them for 60 bucks when they first came out and sat. the game is the game though, L has been taken.
09s were real nice. Regret selling mine, but I agree with moneylicious ... I'd rather have the 2013 with the NA and no jumpman in the heel. Plus the 2013 quality is pretty decent.
aside from the tumbled leather on the 09's...the 2013's are better ( all leather, og treatment) ...let us not get into thequality puts any from 2013 to shame, and the jumpman doesnt bother me at all. been on the hunt for 2013s but lucked into these. trigger pulled immediately
hurts that i had to shell out 2 bills for these, when i originally copped them for 60 bucks when they first came out and sat. the game is the game though, L has been taken.
aside from the tumbled leather on the 09's...the 2013's are better ( all leather, og treatment) ...let us not get into the
" i dont own 2013's but i have 09's and theyre much better anyways"
this arguement has rang all year with royals and even the breds.
i own both but the 2013s are gonna age a lot better and wont be as difficult to maintain
2013's > 09...
dam, not bad ... too bad not my sizeDude on fb sneakergroup is sellin a vnds pair for $180. I woulda copped two weeks ago if i didnt find a ds pair for $220.
I also agree with both you. Passed in 09, but could NOT pass in 13. Correct me if I am wrong, but the leather on the 09s were the same as all the releases of that era. The only difference is that nubuck toe that seems to make people think the 09s are of high quality.
NA, blank heel, high cut > nubuck toe, jumpman, mid cut
Yes. The royals and Breds feel smoother, thicker, and softer in my opinion. Not saying the leather on the shadows are terrible.Is the leather on these diff from the royals & breds ? I just bought a pair but the leather feels different, more flimsy, the bottoms & tags match