Air Jordan 11 Space Jam-December 10, 2016-$220

[The Fresh Prince]

why would u sound out da colors of da 2000 release when it says "jam" on da tongue? [emoji]129300[/emoji]

No what I'm saying is that those are the closest to the movie version but is not exactly like the movie version because the Jumpman was Concord. Same thing like with the 2011 Black, Bordeaux, and Light Graphite 7s have the Silver midsole.

 

[snapreme]

This thread tho... Must be bored out y'all minds.

 

[kaycurrency]

This thread tho... Must be bored out y'all minds.

The only time I'm on NT is when I'm bored, so there's some truth to that statement [emoji]128514[/emoji]

 

[airthompson]

View media item 1256201

 

[Bert.]

Would
Be nice if jimmy posted some pictures

 

[justbecool]

I've been watching the game but now I think it's over for the Cavs so I'm back lol

 

[remmiwav]

We could call them the Monstars lol

 

[g money 87]

These are the Jordan Retro 11 Black/White/Blue/Purple/Green/White/Ice/Black 11s

 

[pmpdaddyrobford]

Well if they were the old version I would expect the sole to be yellowed by now, unless he did the absolute most to keep that pair DS Even even then. If they were the 2016 version then he'd have to have put them through some regular wear for them to already no longer have the blue tint to them and that's assuming that even he could get a pair this early. I'd expect them to be the 72-10s more than the other options.

Aw shucks, they're already confirmed to have those icey blue soles?
This was also purely observation and speculation for those who like to get their panties in a bunch lol

nothing is confirmed

 

[tonytobacco]

they're da same sneaker sans da 23...

a number doesn't change da name of da sneaker b...

I'm starting to understand what the problem is here. You guys can't see. I wish you would've told me that a few pages ago.

The lining and jumpman make it a different shoe more than the 45 does.

 

[thegamemodo9]

"Believe it or not....George isn't at home"

Lol

 

[thegamemodo9]

 
I'm starting to understand what the problem is here. You guys can't see. I wish you would've told me that a few pages ago.

The lining and jumpman make it a different shoe more than the 45 does.

Do you actually buy any retros? Or just complain about how they're all different, even some incredibly marginally, from the OGs?

Honest question.

 

[kaycurrency]

I'm starting to understand what the problem is here. You guys can't see. I wish you would've told me that a few pages ago.

The lining and jumpman make it a different shoe more than the 45 does.

His point is they're still the "Chicago" Jordan X's... Even with the noticeable differences.

 

[justbecool]

These are the Jordan Retro 11 Black/White/Blue/Purple/Green/White/Ice/Black 11s

Is this a link or am I tripping?

 

[jays25]

These are the Jordan Retro 11 Black/White/Blue/Purple/Green/White/Ice/Black 11s

Is this a link or am I tripping?

Tripping. Just regular words colored red

 

[tonytobacco]

 
Do you actually buy any retros? Or just complain about how they're all different, even some incredibly marginally, from the OGs?

Honest question.

I only buy the classics in the classic colorways. For instance in the past year the only pairs I was into enough to purchase were the CHIs, Bords, and Cements (none of which were altered from the original aside from very minute details). The SBBs made sense at the time but as always the new colorway pales in comparison to the classics so they stayed in the box for trade bait specifically for whats dropping this September. Everything that has come after 2000 is garbage as far as Im concerned except for the 17. The beginning of the end was the XV.

I seriously don't understand how you can't see that this year's 'space jam' XI is the same exact shoe the man wore in the playoffs a year before the stupid movie ever came out. Down to the number. But whatever to all that they're space jams amirite?

 

[justbecool]

Tripping. Just regular words colored red

That's what I thought after tryna click it like 10 times lmao.

 

[spizike231]

nvm

 

[spizike231]

Also, stick with the original names if they're the same colorway.

Yes, even if there are slight differences like an added number on the side.
At the end of the day, it's the same damn colorway as the previous release.

 

[spizike231]

Lower the PL cut ​

​

View media item 1937027​

 

[justbecool]

I only buy the classics in the classic colorways. For instance in the past year the only pairs I was into enough to purchase were the CHIs, Bords, and Cements (none of which were altered from the original aside from very minute details). The SBBs made sense at the time but as always the new colorway pales in comparison to the classics so they stayed in the box for trade bait specifically for whats dropping this September. Everything that has come after 2000 is garbage as far as Im concerned except for the 17. The beginning of the end was the XV.

I seriously don't understand how you can't see that this year's 'space jam' XI is the same exact shoe the man wore in the playoffs a year before the stupid movie ever came out. Down to the number. But whatever to all that they're space jams amirite?

Tradebait huh?

 

[x-alt]

I seriously don't understand how you can't see that this year's 'space jam' XI is the same exact shoe the man wore in the playoffs a year before the stupid movie ever came out. Down to the number. But whatever to all that they're space jams amirite?

View media item 1937027

We've grown used to it, and honestly I don't mind either.

 

[spizike231]

Nah famb don't edit that out now.

You already said it's not a bad idea and you like a lower PL cut.

 

[cobrab19]

why would u sound out da colors of da 2000 release when it says "jam" on da tongue? [emoji]129300[/emoji]

Don't even get him started dog he names each color of the shoe to be "different"

 

[x-alt]

Nah famb don't edit that out now.

You already said it's not a bad idea and you like a lower PL cut.

It would sound like I love a 2008 Bred PL cut.