- 23,463
- 47,455
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2014
Og's are fatter.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The leather on those OGs. This year's White/Reds are nice but the differences between them and the OGs are definitely noticeable.The bulkiness of the OGs is noticeable as the slant from the toe to the ankle area. Notice at the ankle it goes down at a slight curve and then a 45 degree angle slant to the toe. The newer retros doesn’t have that slant, they slimmed it down and does a more curve approach (banana shape). You can also see more white leather above the mudguard which signals more material surface area. The OGs are also taller and the retro is shorter in height. I’m sure others can add on differences
So you want the puffer jacket look back?The photo you provided looks like the shoe was found in storage and at the bottom of the pile.
Put it on foot and see how the shape is different.
If you can’t notice the difference in person than there’s not much else I can assist with. You either notice the differences or you don’t
Personally, and this is just my opinion, I think it more so has to do with Nike/Jordan Brand wanting to drag out OG rereleases as long as possible. They make some changes to satisfy people and some purists but not enough for them to pass on the next iteration. If they made these 1:1 there'd be no reason for people to buy them again in 10 years or so unless they either love the shoe that much or their pair was beat, sold, etc and they don't want to pay resell for a new one.Man we been past that realization
Everything in fashion is slimmer now so it makes sense that they slimmed down the upper
If you expect a 25 year old shoe that I used to hoop in to still have the factory lace shape then thats a whole nother issueThe photo you provided looks like the shoe was found in storage and at the bottom of the pile.
Put it on foot and see how the shape is different.
If you can’t notice the difference in person then there’s not much else I can assist with. You either notice the differences or you don’t
Been saying this..2016 Mold of Blk/Red’s are more closer to OG than any recent 12 since.They dropped the ball with these. The Blk/Reds from 2016 have more of a OG shape imo. And the outsole should be more transparent.
How is it severely thrashed?Props for still having your ogs but that pair is so severely thrashed you can’t make a proper comparison to ds 2023 pair
How is it severely thrashed?
them some UGLY *** beaters lolHow are they not? Mad people have posted WORN ogs on here in WAY better shape than those. I don’t understand, you’re saying that your pair isn’t COOKED just because they’re intact? No man. You can’t make comparisons when the shape of the shoe has been changed from being balled in for 20 years
Finally got notification from Nike that they shipped. Took friggin long enough. Expected delivery Wednesday, at this rate though I’ll be surprised if they get here before Christmas.
Aint been no mad pics of personal OGs posted nowhere on NTHow are they not? Mad people have posted WORN ogs on here in WAY better shape than those. I don’t understand, you’re saying that your pair isn’t COOKED just because they’re intact? No man. You can’t make comparisons when the shape of the shoe has been changed from being balled in for 20 years
Post a pic of you holding your OGs and post a pic of the product tag for verificationthem some UGLY *** beaters lol
Aint been no mad pics of personal OGs posted nowhere on NT
Its very rare that anyone on this site post pics of personal OGs of any 1-13 Jordan
Balled in for 20 years????
You just threw that in out of nowhere
The part of the shoe that was being called “bulky” is still in good condition and that is what the discussion was about
Post a pic of you holding your OGs and post a pic of the product tag for verification