- 4,812
- 640
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2011
Coppers and I'm good.
Air Jordan 17 Retro - possible qt3 2013 (now with pics of box for proof)
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by kamueorcarl,
- Start date
- Status
- 306
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
take that shoe string cover off
- 3,436
- 494
- Joined
- Dec 14, 1999
If they do get retroed, I'd love to see a black/red release.
- 3,969
- 535
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2001
Don't know why some are saying "NO PLEASE DONT RELEASE THOSE JUST MORE AJ 1-14 PLEASE!"
Come one, if you don't like them just don't buy. Other's want these badly because they either
missed out during OG release or their OGs are worn out.
Both Air Jordan XVII and XVIII sold well despite of the high retail price, also because MJ
graced them on the NBA hardwood, and they are interesting looking shoes.
Come one, if you don't like them just don't buy. Other's want these badly because they either
missed out during OG release or their OGs are worn out.
Both Air Jordan XVII and XVIII sold well despite of the high retail price, also because MJ
graced them on the NBA hardwood, and they are interesting looking shoes.
EddieDoyers
formerly eddiengambino
- 46,208
- 23,878
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2012
Man, these were good to ball in when I got these in middle school
- 5,719
- 2,226
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2002
I'm happy for the people that want these. The xvii aren't very comfortable for my fat foot so ill probably pass. I am upset that the xvi aren't getting retroed first though.
- 49
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2012
I think the black and red would be sick if done right......
prison mike
Banned
- 266
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2008
Your right about the college blues, but I'm sure the 061 colorway is gonna be black and silvers. I know 6 usually denotes red, but there have been exceptions. The white and reds would be a 106/116 type color code.
- 1,709
- 1,027
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2008
I would cop....they was dope to me....
- 49
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2012
Yeah, thats true.... But I was going off of the colors he told me, he said Black, Red, and Silver...... He also said one was an OG color and one was a new color.... So just me guessing im thinking the white, black, and blue is the OG.... If they are bringing back the XVII they have to start with a bang and whats better that the very 1st XVII.... to get the hype up.. We shall see tho..
- 5,206
- 358
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2009
One of the few doubles I own (pics are old)
- 15,762
- 516
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
Those lightnings
Brings back so many memories.
Brings back so many memories.
- 1,143
- 105
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2003
yes as long as they dont come with that suitcase im good
- 2,279
- 6,407
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2010
Originally Posted by kamueorcarl
Now as you can see the box clearly says AIR JORDAN XVII
Now most of the XVII's came in a suitcase except for the XVII lows, so to make sure its not the lows, this box says XVII LOW
The top pic has to be the coppers not the 2013 release. Although I do not own the coppers (because I did not like them at the time), they did come in the Jordan face box. I have all the lows, white/college blue and CDP. Also, if it was the 2013 release, it would have said Air Jordan XVII (17) RETRO.Edit: Never mind, It might just be the 2013 release. Coppers had XVII+. My fault.
- 37,753
- 15,437
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2005
Not sure how to feel about this but ok. I don't think I'll cop, my OG University Blues are still in great shape. I bet the beasts would be ALL over these
. I paid $75 for my pair.
- 49
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2012
Originally Posted by scoop99
Originally Posted by kamueorcarl
Now as you can see the box clearly says AIR JORDAN XVII
Now most of the XVII's came in a suitcase except for the XVII lows, so to make sure its not the lows, this box says XVII LOW
The top pic has to be the coppers not the 2013 release. Although I do not own the coppers (because I did not like them at the time), they did come in the Jordan face box. I have all the lows, white/college blue and CDP. Also, if it was the 2013 release, it would have said Air Jordan XVII (17) RETRO. Edit: Never mind, It might just be the 2013 release. Coppers had XVII+. My fault.
I have coppers and it says XVII+, i just checked..... Edit - I just seen your post.
- 618
- 11
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2009
Originally Posted by poonsaloon
JB lost me on the sigs after the XIV's so if these actually retro next year it just means more $$$ in my account and less nagging from Wifey!
- 42,477
- 42,447
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
Patiently waiting on a reliable source,I'm calling duck tales for now.
BTW,why would JB retro the 17 before the 16?
BTW,why would JB retro the 17 before the 16?
- 55,173
- 62,418
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
I like the lows, the highs, not so much
The only thing good about the highs IMO was the case.
The only thing good about the highs IMO was the case.
KMante
Staff member
- 4,998
- 2,455
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2011
What did the suitcase do to you?
- 49
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2012
The very first retro jordan in 94 was the I's then he went to III's and back to II's........ so what does that mean?
- 49
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2012
- 1,625
- 412
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2003
Calling ducktales... and that picture of the box label doesn't prove anything IMO.
That label is clearly the same style as the "face-box" Jordan box labels... which is a style they haven't made since approximately 2005. There is no reason that it would be brought back now... even to house a "sample" or whatever they are. Makes no sense.
Also, a few notes about that label:
- I have never seen an authentic Jordan box label have both the "roman numeral" and numeric number both listed for a signature/numbered pair from the Air Jordan line. It is either one or the other.
- It appears that there is too large of a gap/space between the "n" on Jordan to the "XVII"
- The font looks suspicious/small (when compared to labels of that era)... could just be the angle, but I don't know about it.
That label is clearly the same style as the "face-box" Jordan box labels... which is a style they haven't made since approximately 2005. There is no reason that it would be brought back now... even to house a "sample" or whatever they are. Makes no sense.
Also, a few notes about that label:
- I have never seen an authentic Jordan box label have both the "roman numeral" and numeric number both listed for a signature/numbered pair from the Air Jordan line. It is either one or the other.
- It appears that there is too large of a gap/space between the "n" on Jordan to the "XVII"
- The font looks suspicious/small (when compared to labels of that era)... could just be the angle, but I don't know about it.
D
Deleted member 43946
Guest
thank you. With all these sneakerheads in here i couldnt believe i was the only one that noticed. so much wrong with that label alone. not sayin they wont be retroed but that label was def. made by someone other than nike. ducktales for now...
- 7,139
- 1,708
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
I'll believe it when I see it.
All these rumors....
All these rumors....
- Status
Similar threads
