- Jul 26, 2014
- 684
- 1,210
How about an se? We haven’t had an se since the 34!It would be nice to a get a UNC colorway because we haven’t had one since the XXXII.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How about an se? We haven’t had an se since the 34!It would be nice to a get a UNC colorway because we haven’t had one since the XXXII.
Air Jordan 2009 is the worst Air Jordan of all time and it’s not even close. Time still hasn’t helped that garbageLol people actually liked them trash 2009s? You're in luck, they have a fsr at your nearest Ross.
38s are aite.
34s and 36s are the best of the recent joints.
Well this soul definitely would cop I don't follow the crowd I could careless what the next person have to say not everyone hated that shoe so I guess it has to be a old school retro to be accepted man I can remember back in the 92 and 93 my freshman year og high-school those 7's didn't sell out h#ll they were still sitting on the shelves when the 8's came out and was deep discounted and the 8's did the same they when the 9's and 10 's drop
Air Jordan 2009 is the worst Air Jordan of all time and it’s not even close. Time still hasn’t helped that garbage
2012 was worse looks wise. 37 lows are fire. 23 lows had poorest quality. How do you feel about XV, XX9, XXXI quality wise? I’m undecided.The 37 is by far the worst looks and quality wise. Idk how people can say otherwise.
I’d put the 2012 2nd worse all time looks wise.2012 was worse looks wise. 37 lows are fire. 23 lows had poorest quality. How do you feel about XV, XX9, XXXI quality wise? I’m undecided.
Honorable mention but no lol. Them 2009 heels are stupid. And the colorways sucked. Just a weird design. That’s the era when Kobe’s and Lebrons started outshining Jordan’s new sigs. That shoe just started the downfallThe 37 is by far the worst looks and quality wise. Idk how people can say otherwise.
It was a weird design but colorways sucked?Honorable mention but no lol. Them 2009 heels are stupid. And the colorways sucked. Just a weird design. That’s the era when Kobe’s and Lebrons started outshining Jordan’s new sigs. That shoe just started the downfall
White and black and black and white? What was so great about that? What was the accent color? Grey? lolIt was a weird design but colorways sucked?
White/black
Black/white red
Black/red gold
Black/gold
Shoe had decent quality, it was before the era of the flyweave, which then turned into the era of plastic, fake leather and mesh that we are in now.
I thought the 19 look like s word. I never tried them on but can't imagine them looking good with anything. Id rather the lows.I’d put the 2012 2nd worse all time looks wise.
Not talking about any lows cuz the 37 low is nice.
I loved the 15, 29 was great hooper but I’d never wear it off court. The 31 probably has the best colorways of any sig shoe I can remember.
I dunno man. That kind of seems like a losing proposition on Nike's end. It's possible that the 39's are an amazing model that generates a ton of hype and gets enough buzz that they sell out immediately, but based off the past few years models, that doesn't seem like it's gonna be the case.JB should give us the Nike ID option for the 39. Let us make the color ways we want. We can have our own PEs. BTW, I love my retro 9s, the black/white color way.
I think it’s fair to say that’s how it’s been since the 34 at least. Just hints/nods in the design elements and a couple colorways.Would like the 39 to be its own shoe.
Not be inspired by the 9s except for maybe colorways.
I think it’s fair to say that’s how it’s been since the 34 at least. Just hints/nods in the design elements and a couple colorways.
I'd say 33..