- 12,061
- 5,112
Black is too black. Laces are too lacey. Pull tabs are .004 centimeters shorter than the OGs. Pass
What about the netting though? Look waaaay too much like netting. Easy pass.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Black is too black. Laces are too lacey. Pull tabs are .004 centimeters shorter than the OGs. Pass
If people are happy with the degradation in quality from OG/99 to CDP/2012, along with a price hike to $160+ you're only playing yourself.
People should still cop what they want, but dont put on blinders and pretend there is nothing wrong
I think he needs that hot tub time machinestop living in the past, nothing stays the same.
If people are happy with the degradation in quality from OG/99 to CDP/2012, along with a price hike to $160+ you're only playing yourself.
People should still cop what they want, but dont put on blinders and pretend there is nothing wrong
stop living in the past, nothing stays the same.
Dude's post went over your head apparently. Since when did NT become a place where people couldn't discuss or god forbid critique in a constructive manner? Don't confuse actual insight with some of the generic "OGs will always be king" drivel.stop living in the past, nothing stays the same.If people are happy with the degradation in quality from OG/99 to CDP/2012, along with a price hike to $160+ you're only playing yourself.
People should still cop what they want, but dont put on blinders and pretend there is nothing wrong
Some don't get it no matter how simple it is lol and you stated it perfectly.stop living in the past, nothing stays the same.If people are happy with the degradation in quality from OG/99 to CDP/2012, along with a price hike to $160+ you're only playing yourself.
People should still cop what they want, but dont put on blinders and pretend there is nothing wrong
I wouldnt have thought this needed to be said, but ...
the whole point of retros is to live in the past.
otherwise you might as well just cop spizikes and 0.0 models, or drift over to Lebrons
And in any case, it has nothing to do with "living in the past" to want to get your money's worth.
If I pay $160 for a pair of IV's its reasonable to expect them to be made properly (shape, construction, leather materials, fit, paint quality)
This shouldnt need to be explained, its a universal tenet of consumer satisfaction
And here I thought I was just buying Retros because I like the shoe. I didn't know you had to some sort of attachment to want to buy a shoe. I didn't know I bought Jordans to live in the "past".Some don't get it no matter how simple it is lol and you stated it perfectly.
By definition, living in the past is the ENTIRE POINT OF RETROS.
The fibers or hairs of the materials are sorta like hair on a head:
Suede = #3 on clippers
Nubuck = #2
Durabuck = #1
It was a basic definition of Retro.And here I thought I was just buying Retros because I like the shoe. I didn't know you had to some sort of attachment to want to buy a shoe. I didn't know I bought Jordans to live in the "past".Some don't get it no matter how simple it is lol and you stated it perfectly.
By definition, living in the past is the ENTIRE POINT OF RETROS.
People can do what they want. I have no problem with either side of the argument. Some want things to be like they were in the old days and some get that things change for better or worse. Neither philosophy is invalid but sometimes you just have to come to terms with the way things are. I could careless why someone else buys shoes. My issue is the constant crying about the same subject over and over again. Are we men or women up in here?It was a basic definition of Retro.
You are more than entitled to buy a shoe just because you like it. I often buy things just because I like them. As a consumer it is my right as it is yours. What the next man does with his money isn't any of my concern. On the same token, how can you fault another man for living in the past and having an actual attachment to the shoes that goes beyond liking the way it looks? Different strokes for different folks, people.
People can do what they want. I have no problem with either side of the argument. Some want things to be like they were in the old days and some get that things change for better or worse. Neither philosophy is invalid but sometimes you just have to come to terms with the way things are. I could careless why someone else buys shoes. My issue is the constant crying about the same subject over and over again. Are we men or women up in here?
I see a certain UK site will have these for 130.00 pounds, thats about 209.00 US dollars roughly.. I hope they have a code to reduce that price
Thanks. I just ordered from them last night so I don't have to deal with all the possible headaches on rd. I'll still try to grab a 2nd pair online but even if that doesn't work out, I won't be the least bit madNot at all. I've been wearing them consistently for the past week. No major creasing or paint cracking.
For those wondering, I purchased them from sol3society.com. I took a chance on an "early release" pair, and I'm 100% satisfied. They came with box, paper, shoe trees and keychain. There's nothing that says these are fake or b-grades in any way.
So to answer the question whether or not all early release pairs are fake...The answer is....NO.
They fit the same to me.IJP
How does the sizing compare to the WC's?
We're pretty much on the same page. This is NT, not ISS. Read some of the threads in the Nike Retro board, imagine if people just stopped dropping knowledge and history...those threads would be completely dead. The Chlorophyll Air Trainer I thread is currently my favorite thread to drop in on because the info is plentiful. What exactly are we supposed to talk about? If I'm dissatisfied with a pair enough to the point that it disgusts me then I simply don't even bother commenting in the thread anymore and take the shoe off my radar ("Fire Red" V's, Grape V's, White/Red/Black I's, etc).I'm with you on some of this, but not all.People can do what they want. I have no problem with either side of the argument. Some want things to be like they were in the old days and some get that things change for better or worse. Neither philosophy is invalid but sometimes you just have to come to terms with the way things are. I could careless why someone else buys shoes. My issue is the constant crying about the same subject over and over again. Are we men or women up in here?
I agree that people need to come to terms with some of the changes, I can live with the nubuck (I know I will still be trying to cop 2 pairs), but that's never gonna stop me from hoping I get my money's worth, and pointing out things I'm dissatisfied with. If people on Niketalk dont wanna hear an explanation of what's different and what JB might be screwing up, then they picked the wrong forum to join.
If JB ever changed something for the better I'd be more okay with that, but let me know when that happens cause I cant think of any example of that, ever. Meanwhile the price keeps going up
I know its tiresome to hear some of the same complaints over and over again, but the problems keep persisting. I cant speak for everybody, but I always try to be informative with my critique, illustrating with comparison pics etc. whats changed or different, so that young cats or newbies can learn a little about Jordans, and we can have informed discussion (I know, hard to come by these days).
That's how I learned, and its a big part of what Niketalk is about
And while we're on that, we are all on a shoe collectors forum, so the men or women question sailed along time ago, tired
And here I thought I was just buying Retros because I like the shoe. I didn't know you had to some sort of attachment to want to buy a shoe. I didn't know I bought Jordans to live in the "past".