Air Jordan IX Wht/Blk/Red First Look **8/7/10 Release**

[sundoosendo]

no point in these maybe jb will give us another hare vii

 

[theshoeking23]

The back just looks a little wierd...not to mention the small Jumpman on the side

 

[frenchblue23]

Originally Posted by BdaShoes


My pics... these joints are very nice imo

​

Are these the 2010's or CDP's?  
I thought the jumpman on the left shoe was not going to be backwards like this??    

Hmmm.  

 

[retrokid33]

Just got my pair on Friday. They are nice!

 

[regal black]

Originally Posted by FrenchBlue23

Originally Posted by BdaShoes


My pics... these joints are very nice imo

​

Are these the 2010's or CDP's?  
I thought the jumpman on the left shoe was not going to be backwards like this??    

Hmmm.  

Yea I had the same thoughts.  Other pics had the backwards jumpman logo on the left shoe.

 

[mrflightposite]

nice pics... definitely coppin'

 

[xbiker47]

Ill cop when they go on sale

 

[luis og13s]

im still wondering why JB would release these so soon after the CDP

Quality will be beyond horrible on these

 

[gottabdashoes]

Damn, you guys don't miss a thing..

Anyway, I posted the wrong pics yesterday. Here are the original pics I was supposed to post...

​

 

[chronicshoester]

the look good..

 

[meds23]

@GottaBdaShoes- nice AJ IX pics.. cant wait to cop my pair...

 

[theshoeking23]

Thanks for posting your pics GottaBdaShoes...hope its not a problem but ima do a mini comparison with your pictures.

2010


CDP " I believe"




I would go with the CDP version anyday

 

[rl treyce]

What is the difference?

 

[upandcoming32]

from what I see, reverse jumpman logo

 

[trae22can]

my homie got them yesterday. whats with the glitter look on the black part? looks just like cdp

 

[theshoeking23]

^^lol, Im guessing you never owned a pair of the Blk and White IX's.

But the differences between the CDP's and 2010's is the shape and the midsoles are formed different. But the jumpman looks stupid and it makes them look fake.

 

[rico7jt]

I think Im going to be on the hunt for some CDP IXs and pass on these 2010 IXs.

 

[redrum]

It's funny how yall always think the past release is always better than a newer retro,
I have a pair of CDP IX's, and the paint chips horribly, don't know about this new retro though.

 

[steve212]

Quality is much better on this new batch of IX retros. CDP IX's and 2002 IX's chipped badly.

 

[steve212]

Quality is much better on this new batch of IX retros. CDP IX's and 2002 IX's chipped badly.

 

[remi23]

Originally Posted by Steve212

Quality is much better on this new batch of IX retros. CDP IX's and 2002 IX's chipped badly.

Really I have wore my 2002 Pair about 4-5 times and they haven't chipped.

 

[shoeheadjeezy]

I'm ready to get these never had this colorway my favorite out of the IX's

 

[rico7jt]

Steve212 wrote:

---

Quality is much better on this new batch of IX retros. CDP IX's and 2002 IX's chipped badly.




Really ????


If thats the case then Ill take back my old statement.


Guess Illl have to make my mind up on RD. Im gonna need to see and feel them in person.

 

[azhul23]

Originally Posted by UPandCOMING32

from what I see, reverse jumpman logo

School me on these, the OG jumpman logo is the same with theCDP's? or the 2010?

 

[mjmoney23]

"It's funny how yall always think the past release is always better than a newer retro"

Agreed.


As for the paint chip problems, the Powders were great, I wore them for 2 weeks in Poland and there is no chipped paint what so ever.