- 10,057
- 1,919
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
I've seen it and I have to say it's interesting, I chatted with a Nike Rep today and they told me the total opposite but considering he got his info from a higher-up it's more believable
Air Jordan Retro 5 "Doernbecher" release!! 9/14/13 No BOT TALK/SELLING/BUYING/TRADING
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by mcflyaldin,
- Start date
- 3,337
- 1,700
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2013
Yeah I saw that video yesterday, which is why my hopes are not up.
- 6,250
- 607
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2010
That happened just this year in february during day time. I had lucked up on 2 for $440 total.
Last edited:
- 1,563
- 87
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2007
- 288
- 122
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2013
Same here
- 980
- 300
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2009
Something interesting I noticed about the DB5 product page link that @nikestore originally tweeted on release date.
So, this is the original tweet: . You'll notice that they used a URL shortener to shorten the URL of the DB5 product page that they linked to—no big deal here; most companies already use a URL shortener when they share links on Twitter and Nike's been doing that for a while now for releases.
As you can see in the tweet, the shortened URL is this: "swoo.sh/15qHRPN". Currently, if you click on that shortened URL it brings to you this page: "http://store.nike.com/us/en_us/pw/n/1j7?sl=page-not-found&cp=usns_twit_091413_doernbecher", which is a "No Matches Found" page.
However, on the release date, this was the original DB5 product page that you landed on when you clicked on the shortened URL from their tweet: "http://store.nike.com/us/en_us/pd/i...1/pgid-870387?cp=usns_twit_091413_doernbecher". However, if you now go to that link, it will redirect you to the same "No Matches Found" page: "http://store.nike.com/us/en_us/pw/n/1j7?sl=page-not-found&cp=usns_twit_091413_doernbecher". This isn't a surprise since the original URL is the link that was shortened, therefore, if the shortened URL (which is currently on the tweet) redirects, then the original URL also must redirect.
It's interesting that they would even redirect the original link to a "No Matches Found" page at all. Any idea as to why they would do that?
So, this is the original tweet: . You'll notice that they used a URL shortener to shorten the URL of the DB5 product page that they linked to—no big deal here; most companies already use a URL shortener when they share links on Twitter and Nike's been doing that for a while now for releases.
As you can see in the tweet, the shortened URL is this: "swoo.sh/15qHRPN". Currently, if you click on that shortened URL it brings to you this page: "http://store.nike.com/us/en_us/pw/n/1j7?sl=page-not-found&cp=usns_twit_091413_doernbecher", which is a "No Matches Found" page.
However, on the release date, this was the original DB5 product page that you landed on when you clicked on the shortened URL from their tweet: "http://store.nike.com/us/en_us/pd/i...1/pgid-870387?cp=usns_twit_091413_doernbecher". However, if you now go to that link, it will redirect you to the same "No Matches Found" page: "http://store.nike.com/us/en_us/pw/n/1j7?sl=page-not-found&cp=usns_twit_091413_doernbecher". This isn't a surprise since the original URL is the link that was shortened, therefore, if the shortened URL (which is currently on the tweet) redirects, then the original URL also must redirect.
It's interesting that they would even redirect the original link to a "No Matches Found" page at all. Any idea as to why they would do that?
Last edited:
- 735
- 52
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2008
noticed this yesterday morning too even before the restock: the original twitter link redirects to a page that says "no matches found." so i'm curious to know how j23 or whoever discovered it first found the new link for the db5 restock because it's different from what was originally tweeted on release day.
Last edited:
- 30,184
- 1,991
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2000
Just got shipping conf
- 3,510
- 1,337
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2012
Shipped!
- 40,141
- 11,080
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
- 1,938
- 201
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
bigj505
Staff member
- 42,582
- 21,770
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2007
Bro, it's easy to create a new account and use a different payment method
Bans are temporary inconveniences. Bulk buyers will just find another way.
- 6,548
- 2,596
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2002
Was the URL that was active yesterday the same URL used for the DBV page on Monday?
- 1,458
- 201
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2004
U guys think this is the last we will see of the db5 for retail?
- 746
- 39
- Joined
- May 23, 2013
I think I've read most of the posts and I'm also wondering this. How was this found in the first place? Same URL as Saturday release continually refreshing?
- 40,141
- 11,080
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
doubt it ...theres a buch that must be there from cancelled orders
- 45
- 19
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2013
Was the DB3 link in here? I didn't see it. Thanks.
- 1,462
- 125
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2013
damn close to it. Everyone that got the restock was all legit. Unless there's some hardheaded that order two pairs. They over sold their stock so I don't there's anymore. They said they only had what? 20 pairs. In that one guy video when he was talking to the manager.
- 10,933
- 4,861
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2005
IF THEY ONLY HAD 20 PAIRS THEN NIKE EMPLOYEES ATE THE REST UP BEHIND THE SCENES
THERE WERE A LOT MORE CANCELLED PAIRS THAN THAT. 100% FACT.
THERE WERE A LOT MORE CANCELLED PAIRS THAN THAT. 100% FACT.
- 5,592
- 6,567
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2004
Highly doubt they only had 20 pairs availableIF THEY ONLY HAD 20 PAIRS THEN NIKE EMPLOYEES ATE THE REST UP BEHIND THE SCENES
THERE WERE A LOT MORE CANCELLED PAIRS THAN THAT. 100% FACT.
- 53
- 26
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2013
Just talk to nike on the chat and they said that these did restock and it wasn't a mistake on their part. Hopefully my pair goes through
- 442
- 229
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2012
What I dont get is if all the original db5 links didnt work, how did j23 stumble on a working one yesterday?
- 442
- 229
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2012
What I dont get is if all the original db5 links didnt work, how did j23 stumble on a working one yesterday?
- 442
- 229
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2012
What I dont get is if all the original db5 links didnt work, how did j23 stumble on a working one yesterday?
- 890
- 82
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2013
Perhaps he searched by model number and color code