- 649
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2007
ill post the pics when i get home...
Air Jordan Retro VI "Pistons" Detailed Pics (Warning They are Horrible)
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by greatestgoliath,
- Start date
chicityk7
Banned
- 1,562
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2008
VIA T.S.G. WHERES YOUR PICS ckauffman23
- 1,928
- 67
- Joined
- May 28, 2008
Nah, I can't, I won't.
- 649
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2007
- 209
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2010
these shoes are not for everybody, but people been coppin in NYC.
- 2,986
- 1,014
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2010
smh
- 47
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2010
reminds u ov thr season ths year....crap
- 20,261
- 2,188
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2006
- 11,534
- 321
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2006
I really wish the toe box area wasnt PL ....
- 5,790
- 1,193
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2007
Chicityk7 wrote:
VIA T.S.G. WHERES YOUR PICS ckauffman23
MUCH nicer than OPs pics would lead you to believe but still an easy pass.
- 9,453
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2009
saw these in person at Footaction today and they're just terrible. Patent leather just kills it.
- 389
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2008
Yuku FTL
- 389
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2008
I saw these in person at True the other day. I think they would actually be pretty dope if there wasn't any patent leather on them. That just killed it for me. HARD to pass on VI's for me though...
- 1,855
- 12
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2007
I think PL killed these for just about everyone. JB is riding the short yellow bus these days.
- 409
- 11
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
Can't do it for anything more than $79.99. Even at that point, it'd just be for "beater" status kicks.
sneakerking2033
Banned
- 1,705
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2007
lol looks like something only for kids to wear should of only released in kids sizes smh
- 649
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2007
wore them into the hook up in houston friday and they had em on the counter sellin for 275... he asked how much i paid for mine and i said 150 smh. Got alot of complements on em, and everyone likes em that sees em. Certainly not the best pair of shoes but far from worse
- 229
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2007
I havent logged into this site in a long time. I come back and I see THIS!? JB never ceases to disappoint.
- 682
- 28
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2005
Saw these in person they have to be one of the ugliest retros ever
taggpoppernj
Banned
- 1,084
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2008
trash, trash, trash, trash
- 3,476
- 12
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2006
I saw these in person today. I have to say, this is really the ugliest VI I've ever seen. At least the Vag-Ina toed Olympic VI's were a white based patent leather. Not far from them, but certainly uglier.
I can't believe people will actually cop this shoe. If they made the Heel Tab and the tongue Black instead of gray, it would look a lot better. And take the patent off........
I can't wait to see the idiot resellers buy these thinking they will sell out, only to be stuck with them.
I can't believe people will actually cop this shoe. If they made the Heel Tab and the tongue Black instead of gray, it would look a lot better. And take the patent off........
I can't wait to see the idiot resellers buy these thinking they will sell out, only to be stuck with them.
- 3,684
- 66
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2009
These shoes are such garbage. I hope JB eventually learns that people won't just buy any retro just because it's a RETRO. FTL sent me an email about these.. free shipping.
whoopty whoop.
- 615
- 136
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2000
Who is responsible at JB for approving colorways like this?!?!
- 152
- 11
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2010
saw these in undefeated smh the vi had a good run this year until these and then the lakers coming out
- 2,925
- 10
- Joined
- May 28, 2008
horrible cw
i'd rather get a second pair of oreos in eastbay(with 20% off) than this garbage
