- Dec 20, 2014
- 3,993
- 14,428
These and the UNC 3s were the only cops of March I wanted. Seeing the leather quality on these puts everyone mind at ease haha. Hopefully these will be a FSR "GR" and not only adults only like the 3s...
Air Jordan V retro OG - Nike Air - Fire Red/Silver tongue - May 2, 2020
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by salacious crumb,
- Start date
- Sep 4, 2006
- 48,678
- 29,008
And ya was worried about the leather
I asked for them not to be but they insisted.
- Apr 23, 2015
- 8,799
- 10,386
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,393
- 32,721
Not big Willie style 
- Apr 23, 2015
- 8,799
- 10,386
Metallic sunday
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,393
- 32,721
- Mar 8, 2020
- 5
- 4
Me? Definitely coppin. These for those 35+.
- Dec 20, 2014
- 3,993
- 14,428
...
Last edited:
- Jan 7, 2008
- 333
- 287
Man, dunno if I can get past that tongue.
Did anyone ever do a proper detailed comparison of the og black vs 2016? Seems like tongue and blue sole were the major gripes?
Did anyone ever do a proper detailed comparison of the og black vs 2016? Seems like tongue and blue sole were the major gripes?
rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,309
- 18,141
Looking pretty good overall with low expectations at this point after all of these years of ****, but damn, that "3M" tongue ... Material/sheen looks like ***, and now they seem to have addressed the "too high" tongue complaints by making it too low again. ****, JB/Nike, how hard is this, really?
rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,309
- 18,141
doublemesh96
LOL I mean, come ON, man. Now I really want to see what official pics and release pairs are like. But assuming the pair in that vid is real, I'm happy but ... not? SMFH
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,393
- 32,721
like you said they’re looking pretty good given the low expectations. The pair in this was looking very good imo. I’m annoyed they can’t nail the 3M but at this point it’s whatever
- Dec 3, 2013
- 22,393
- 32,721
*pair in the video
- Dec 27, 2012
- 8,651
- 11,728
Looks great to me. I can’t wait!
- Sep 6, 2000
- 10,813
- 18,411
Looking pretty good overall with low expectations at this point after all of these years of ****, but damn, that "3M" tongue ... Material/sheen looks like ***, and now they seem to have addressed the "too high" tongue complaints by making it too low again. ****, JB/Nike, how hard is this, really?
This tongue situation is so strange to me. It's been 100% perfect through that Metallic release, and then they just decided to change it for no reason? What sense does that make?
- Nov 15, 2012
- 2,501
- 8,950
rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,309
- 18,141
I’d say it’s been acceptable but definitely not perfect. But now on the pair in that vid, the shape of the tongue is wrong, too. The top portion that the Jumpman sits in tapers in/narrows toward the top. The **** is that??This tongue situation is so strange to me. It's been 100% perfect through that Metallic release, and then they just decided to change it for no reason? What sense does that make?
- Sep 6, 2000
- 10,813
- 18,411
I’d say it’s been acceptable but definitely not perfect. But now on the pair in that vid, the shape of the tongue is wrong, too. The top portion that the Jumpman sits in tapers in/narrows toward the top. The **** is that??
Oh, I just meant the 3M aspect of it lol.
- Feb 20, 2015
- 152
- 166
When do you think we’ll see the black metallics come out again? 2020 too soon?
- May 2, 2010
- 17,222
- 23,564
Black laces? No
white laces? Yes
white laces? Yes
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,366
- 70,877
2025
- Dec 18, 2015
- 18,192
- 27,334
- Aug 21, 2010
- 11,240
- 17,341
That tongue material looks weird.
- Aug 3, 2013
- 2,212
- 3,586
I can’t wait to cop these
had several pairs of 2013s and those weren’t even all that but I love this model so much it don’t eem matter
- Feb 6, 2013
- 2,301
- 2,651
So these look shiny right?
