- 6,998
- 2,790
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
now lets see some 00 comparisons
Air Jordan XI Space Jam posts have been merged into ONE TOPIC!
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by solelocker,
- Start date
- Status
- 15,762
- 517
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
Originally Posted by never wear them
some pairs have a nice patent cut to them.... some dont. i guess ima have to see every damn sz 10.5 or 11 in person to make my choice...
That's what I'm saying
Guess I have to see for myself.
- 8,877
- 452
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2006
IMO, its usually the opposite.
- 12,191
- 5,863
- Joined
- May 7, 2006
- 383
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2007
got mine in the mail today, that is all...
- 16,431
- 2,118
- Joined
- May 12, 2002
I'm glad i'm done with JB
- 2,617
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2009
- 876
- 11
- Joined
- May 11, 2008
Originally Posted by Pdigiti
^^^^^^
The second pic shows just how off the profile is compared to the previous mold. If you're a sz 10/up you're basically hosed. Looks like CDP quality but we already knew that.
- 17,790
- 834
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2008
This is one weird shoe. I'd LOVE a comparison or some kind of in depth review
- 1,451
- 51
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2008
- 3,260
- 22
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2005
Originally Posted by FrenchBlue23
Originally Posted by never wear them
some pairs have a nice patent cut to them.... some dont. i guess ima have to see every damn sz 10.5 or 11 in person to make my choice...
That's what I'm saying
Guess I have to see for myself.
I third this notion.
retrosniper
Banned
- 578
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2008
I really, really prefer my 00s over these for a couple of reasons;
1. These have no JUMPMAN JAM
2. The bottom is.... too icy ?
I'm definitely still on the mission to get these beyond any shadow of a doubt.... but those pics up there the bottoms are like . . . . again I hesitate tosay this, too icy ?!?
1. These have no JUMPMAN JAM
2. The bottom is.... too icy ?
I'm definitely still on the mission to get these beyond any shadow of a doubt.... but those pics up there the bottoms are like . . . . again I hesitate tosay this, too icy ?!?
- 12,191
- 5,863
- Joined
- May 7, 2006
Can we get a comparison? Or at least compare the soles to the eggplant foamposites please.
dendanskesimon
Banned
- 4,017
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2008
4thOriginally Posted by JordanFan04
Originally Posted by FrenchBlue23
Originally Posted by never wear them
some pairs have a nice patent cut to them.... some dont. i guess ima have to see every damn sz 10.5 or 11 in person to make my choice...
That's what I'm saying
Guess I have to see for myself.
I third this notion.
and some comparison pics would be nice
- 386
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2007
My question to those who actually have a pair already (forgive me if it's been answered but I haven't seen this asked yet) How do the sizes run? Arethey tight like the CDPs? I have a pair of OG Columbias in a size 10.5 that fit perfectly and I fit a 10 in most everything else. What size should I cop?Thanks in advance.
- 12,191
- 5,863
- Joined
- May 7, 2006
your true size from what ppl are saying.
- 3,046
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2003
Originally Posted by blahzee
is it me, or are those shaped weird?
- 13,328
- 11,556
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
No its not you those are shaped weird
- 242
- 12
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2009
i'm not understanding why people are paying $250-300 for these shoes. barely worth the retail imo.
- 6,918
- 745
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2009
maybe the ones with a bad patent leather cuts are B-Grades
- 6,918
- 745
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2009
or early samples like you see on the first page
- 206
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2009
thanks man
i hope these are more comfortable than the cdps cuz i plan on balln in one of my pairs. spacejams with icy soles are gonna look hella sexy on the court lol
cherryred
Banned
- 811
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2009
- 12,191
- 5,863
- Joined
- May 7, 2006
What the heck?......
- 1,523
- 334
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
Some of you people b*tch way too much. If you don't like'em, don't buy'em. Simple as that.
- Status