- 19,057
- 9,030
But they were his pe tho? Is that wrong?Only place I saw the Rip reference was the ftl app yesterday, which now shows candy cane.
Both stupid nicknames
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But they were his pe tho? Is that wrong?Only place I saw the Rip reference was the ftl app yesterday, which now shows candy cane.
Both stupid nicknames
What? His PE had "Rip City" stitched on them (stupid as a PE in the first place, since in the NBA Rip City is a Portland reference), and I think his number IIRC. I don't care enough to look it up LOL. Regardless, this release is not his PE, it's a retro of the OG white/red 14. God I hate the internet sometimesBut they were his pe tho? Is that wrong?
Then just articulate your real point and simply say that in the first place. You don't like the 2006 black toes because they have ribbing where the OG does not, and you want the OGs. Don't say the ribbing is ugly when you like it on these white/reds and the "last shots." **** sounds illogical and dopey. I'm out on this debate
My bad for not knowing somethingWhat? His PE had "Rip City" stitched on them (stupid as a PE in the first place, since in the NBA Rip City is a Portland reference), and I think his number IIRC. I don't care enough to look it up LOL. Regardless, this release is not his PE, it's a retro of the OG white/red 14. God I hate the internet sometimes
Yeah, so let me get this straight: You hate the 2006 black toe 14s because they have ribbing on the sides. But you're all about these white/red 14s ... that have the ribbing on the sides. That makes a lot of sense. Let me guess: It's hideous on the black toes because the OG of that colorway didn't have it, but it's OK on these because the OGs of the white/reds had it. If that's the case, it really has nothing to do with what you think looks better or worse, it has to do with just wanting the retros to be true to the OG colorways. I can understand that, but don't say one shoe with the ribbing is ugly because of it while simultaneously saying you're all in on a different white-based colorway that has the same ribbing.
Hope they get the cushioning right on these. My indiglo’s were nowhere near as comfortable as the OGs.
We've been asking around and no one seems to be able to confirm if there is in fact Zoom in Forefoot / Heel.
-Instyleshoes
I knew about the JM and the vents... To bad the insole cover the “vents” on the retros...Probably the first time I've seen you guys post here.. never knew ya'll had an account
But I ound this on a google search on sneakerfiles.com .. not sure how accurate they are but I also never noticed the 14 JM's.. sounds like a cool detail that a lot of the older Jordans had and got overlooked..
The blk/red from last year had it uncovered.I knew about the JM and the vents... To bad the insole cover the “vents” on the retros...
I didn't mean it to sound like I was being a **** toward you, wasn't my intention. My comment about hating the internet was about how it spreads false info at warp speed.My bad for not knowing something
I wore my Indiglos the other day. I felt like they have Zoom in them, just figured it's a slimmer/smaller Zoom unit that maybe it used to be. I could be wrong, though. Will definitely remember to feel for it the next time I wear them.Hope they get the cushioning right on these. My indiglo’s were nowhere near as comfortable as the OGs.
I think, IIRC, Sneakerfiles got it wrong there. Almost positive it was MJ's 550 Maranello that inspired the shoe, not the 355. Not that it even matters, just some uber-dork factoid.But I ound this on a google search on sneakerfiles.com .. not sure how accurate they are but I also never noticed the 14 JM's.. sounds like a cool detail that a lot of the older Jordans had and got overlooked..
I want to see a unboxing of these.. it seems like no you tubers have these in hand for some odd reason
I wore my Indiglos the other day. I felt like they have Zoom in them, just figured it's a slimmer/smaller Zoom unit that maybe it used to be. I could be wrong, though. Will definitely remember to feel for it the next time I wear them.
I think, IIRC, Sneakerfiles got it wrong there. Almost positive it was MJ's 550 Maranello that inspired the shoe, not the 355. Not that it even matters, just some uber-dork factoid.
I wore my Indiglos the other day. I felt like they have Zoom in them, just figured it's a slimmer/smaller Zoom unit that maybe it used to be. I could be wrong, though. Will definitely remember to feel for it the next time I wear them.
why is he wearing a glove?
Says who?Air Jordan 11 is a Viper.
i see.It’s his “trademark.”