- 740
- 128
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2012
Yeah, but I don't hoop no more so fit doesn't really matter and as long as they are moderately comfortable I'm cool with it. But these look great with jeans.
Air Jordan XX8 aka 2013, new "Proplate Zoom" Technology OFFICIAL THREAD.
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by brilliant,
- Start date
- 14
- 11
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2013
#SneakerHeadProblems
- 755
- 163
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2013
I haven't hooped in almost a year myself. I prefer the weight room to the basketball court nowadays. Tempted to again just to try these out on court. But even casually these feel really comfortable
- 57,439
- 60,851
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
JB has to drop this price. It's ******g ridiculous. I really want a pair of a different color way but damn.
- 1,186
- 313
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2012
It's their flagship. They want it exclusive and special. Like owning a luxury watch. They want to keep the price high on them
- 740
- 128
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2012
You believe that, really!
- 1,186
- 313
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2012
I never said it was worth the price or if it's a good price point. I just said its what they are doing to build a competitive advantage. To diferentiate themselves from regular Team Jordan Sigs.
- 755
- 163
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2013
This price point is terrible. I feel like a chump for paying this much for a basketball shoe. But I chose to do it so I'm responsible for it.
jack still45
Banned
- 18
- 12
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2013
Personal I think the price is pretty low when you consider that the Retro XI cost $180, and the newest Jordan shoe should cost at least $100 more and they only cost $70 more? I thinks thats pretty fair and beside, Jordan are meant for the True basketball player with style and substance in mind
- 49
- 20
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
these shoes are just sitting at my local foot locker. green camo and the black/volt colorway. only retros sell in my area so i doubt if these will move at all.
darthska
Staff member
- 44,841
- 28,568
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2004
White midsole instead of black, and a red translucent sole, please.
Or red sole, white midsole up front, black midsole in the back w/ the 2 carbond fiber pieces in black instead of red.
Black shank plate on the bottom, then I'm in.
Damn I love the Columbia XI look. I mean... forever.
Black shank plate on the bottom, then I'm in.
Damn I love the Columbia XI look. I mean... forever.
- 8,061
- 5,267
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2006
im with you on the black plate, yeah those columbias are fire, i knew that colorway would look great on these, now what color would you make the inside?
darthska
Staff member
- 44,841
- 28,568
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2004
Inside of the shroud: white
The shoe on the inside: white, w/ white laces
Sockliner: black
The shoe on the inside: white, w/ white laces
Sockliner: black
- 12,340
- 6,709
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2000
^ How about instead of encouraging more photoshops, you advise people to put them where they should go: http://niketalk.com/f/7351/sneaker-art
- 1,400
- 41
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2005
Damn, the stealth are sold out where I am. Anyone know where they are still available online or in-store?~
- 342
- 155
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2012
I like them and they look great in my opinion. However, it is my opinion. Yours may vary. It's not the color that you see on JUMPMAN23.COM. The color for them there is a lot more dull.
- 740
- 128
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2012
Not hardly. 200.00 for a hooping shoe is not reasonable unless your parents are able to spend money like that 3-4 times a season. Do you know the abuse basketball shoes take or is this just a cool answer.Personal I think the price is pretty low when you consider that the Retro XI cost $180, and the newest Jordan shoe should cost at least $100 more and they only cost $70 more? I thinks thats pretty fair and beside, Jordan are meant for the True basketball player with style and substance in mind.
- 340
- 83
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2012
Man, people complain about these being expensive. But people are dropping $200 on a shoe that has been retroed 5 times already, and the only difference is it has Nike Air on the back. You can't ball in them, they're made cheaply, yet you go and pay for them. These are new technology, good materials, and made to ball in and people say they're too expensive. There's something wrong here.
- 740
- 128
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2012
I said the same thing about he 88's. Maybe my time has passed in these shoes but I know if this continues shoes are going to jump way up and then in 2-5 years they'll fall again and the outlets will be like they use to be back in the days. But looks like I'm about to go on hiatus. Expecting a real baller to be able to buy 200.00 shoes on a regular basis is not feasible and let's be honest, baller aren't the ones buying these shoes.
- 57,439
- 60,851
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
Yeah there's something wrong. The insane price.
Last edited:
- 3,105
- 2,160
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2002
If I find a pair of black/volt ... I'm gonna pull the trigger just to see if these are really that comfortable.
For the people that have them already, is creasing a non issue with these?
For the people that have them already, is creasing a non issue with these?
- 342
- 155
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2012
Definitely a non-issue with these.
- 1,186
- 313
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2012
They can't crease. It's a fabric shroud
- 3,105
- 2,160
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2002
I figured.... Just thought I'd ask to be sure
Good lookin out fellas
Good lookin out fellas
Last edited:
- 3,102
- 574
- Joined
- May 11, 2008
These would have been cool at 215-220 just based on the materials alone. I remember when the 17's with the case came out I thought the pricing was crazy but the shoe is built like a tank and you could count on them out-performing anything that year. Even the low tops had great quality. Let's be honest tho, this is a very flimsy shoe and the midsole saves it (comfort in the forefoot basically). Once I saw the pricing of the 88's like someone else mentioned, it was a sign of things to come 
Last edited:
