I agree wholeheartedly. It kills me when people talk about performance and stuff like that.
Ultimately, you are paying for a brand and what that brand represents. The Air Jordan flagship represents MJ in his prime and therefore it is priced accordingly. Tinker said some time ago that they were looking for the flagship Air Jordan to be the luxury line of basketball shoes. Simple marketing plain and simple.
Just like Gucci, Armani, and even Cole Haan cater to a particular crowd, JB is trying to do the same with this latest edition. Everybody doesn't buy Gucci, Armani, or Cole Haan. So when you see someone wearing these brands its says that they look for the best in footwear. Whether or not JB is able to accomplish this with the flagship shoe remains to be seen but I can admire the attempt.
Ultimately, if you have any skill whatsoever on the basketball court, the shoe that you play in doesn't make a difference. When we were kids we wanted to be like Mike and hoped that buying his shoes would make that dream come true. Needless to say many of us have moved on to other careers and basketball is nothing more than a hobby.
[/
Gucci and most of all the other companies u named are expensive b/c of export taxes. Over in spots like France something as simple as Levi's to us is much more expensive for them b/c of the tax.... The $250 is just poor judgement on their part unless the don't plan on manufacturing alot of these (Yeezys). If these "premium" kicks sit at $250 and end up rotting in outlets for less than the $170 that they charging for retros with less tech then that's a loss on they end IMO