- 4,926
- 8,465
- Joined
- May 12, 2003
Air Jordan XXXVII (37) first look…
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by AIR J XIII,
- Start date
- 13,286
- 10,781
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2016
I clearly remember these, Jordan 2012. actually I was eyeing them when they first came out and just recently rewatched them on youtube yesterday. I know people in general hated these and came the time where retros were all the fuss. that was the time when I was about to come back to playing ball after years being off the game.
- 17,903
- 21,204
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2016
yeah man, jumpman killing the game. can't deny that. the tatum sig at $120?? nuts . Even the Luka at $110.. so niceYeah I’m about 10-15 hours a week right now of combined practice and play time. Got a few young guys who want to start training with me too, so I’m Trying to get it in while I can before the second baby comes
As much as I love playing in Kobe’s, Jordan’s definitely seem a bit more durable and last longer. $110 seems like a great price too! Better suited for a daily shoe.
Wow didn’t know the tatums would be so cheap! Kinda makes me wanna return my all star brons now. Could get 2 jumpmans instead that prob fit my feet better too.
- 17,903
- 21,204
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2016
- 2,878
- 8,632
- Joined
- May 30, 2018
- 4,736
- 5,777
- Joined
- May 11, 2012
Absolutely loving the lows - beasts on court.
- 480
- 905
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
That's the ones I'm planning on getting. A lot of people are saying that they run short and narrow. The xx9 lows were like that for me. What do you think about them as far as fit goes and in comparison with the xx9 low?Absolutely loving the lows - beasts on court.
- 4,736
- 5,777
- Joined
- May 11, 2012
Never had the 29 low, but I will say that I went TTS and my toes are like right up at the edge of the toebox. I like the snug fit, especially for low tops for hooping, but if you like a little space you might wanna try on a half size up if these are available near you in-store (maybe a different CW or something but as long as you can try them on)
- 3,260
- 2,813
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2013
I had the 29 lows. I find it similar where the lows fit a little smaller than the mids. The 37s aren’t as bad though. The 29 lows were painful lol.
lawdog1
Supporter
- 59,626
- 71,565
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2000
Strongly considering picking up the UNDFTDs with the disco code.
What’s up guys, just tried on both the 37 and 37 low in person and had a few thoughts.
37 mid - over all didn’t like the fit of the shoe. Particularly where the arch of the foot is, the insole does not sit flush with the shoe base and it sticks out and will dig into your arch. The shoe is very narrow at that spot and makes the insole pop up. Because the material is thin, it can stretch and accommodate a wider foot up front. Length is very true to size. Overall though it feels like a cheap shoe and somewhat tippy in terms of lateral stability. I tried going half size up and the narrow arch / insole issue was still present.
37 low - feels like the shoe has a wider base through the arch area. Insole sits flush and normal. I have a semi wide foot and true to size felt fine width wise (although I was wearing thin Nike ankle socks, not elites or bball crews). Length wise, it runs a tiny bit short. My big toe was basically right at the tip of the shoe, it runs shorter than some lebron 20s. That said, it felt more comfortable on foot than the bron 20 to me. In terms of the double stacked zoom, it felt bouncy and ok in my right shoe. But in the left shoe it felt a bit awkward and lumpy. Almost as if the zoom was sticking more in my foots arch than in the ball of the foot like it did in the right shoe. If you like your shoes with zero space in the front , true to size is probably fine. But If you play in thick socks and want maybe a half inch of space, I’d say go up half a size.
With all that said, I ended up deciding not to purchase the mid even at the $85 sale price. I will wait for the lows to go on sale later on and grab a pair of those eventually.
37 mid - over all didn’t like the fit of the shoe. Particularly where the arch of the foot is, the insole does not sit flush with the shoe base and it sticks out and will dig into your arch. The shoe is very narrow at that spot and makes the insole pop up. Because the material is thin, it can stretch and accommodate a wider foot up front. Length is very true to size. Overall though it feels like a cheap shoe and somewhat tippy in terms of lateral stability. I tried going half size up and the narrow arch / insole issue was still present.
37 low - feels like the shoe has a wider base through the arch area. Insole sits flush and normal. I have a semi wide foot and true to size felt fine width wise (although I was wearing thin Nike ankle socks, not elites or bball crews). Length wise, it runs a tiny bit short. My big toe was basically right at the tip of the shoe, it runs shorter than some lebron 20s. That said, it felt more comfortable on foot than the bron 20 to me. In terms of the double stacked zoom, it felt bouncy and ok in my right shoe. But in the left shoe it felt a bit awkward and lumpy. Almost as if the zoom was sticking more in my foots arch than in the ball of the foot like it did in the right shoe. If you like your shoes with zero space in the front , true to size is probably fine. But If you play in thick socks and want maybe a half inch of space, I’d say go up half a size.
With all that said, I ended up deciding not to purchase the mid even at the $85 sale price. I will wait for the lows to go on sale later on and grab a pair of those eventually.
- 3,243
- 2,331
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2000
Code also works on the white lows, but doesn’t work on women’s red lows. WTF. They are celebrating international women’s day and they exclude the women’s specific shoe. It’s a bad look for Nike and JB. Was going to get my daughter a pair for her AAU season, but I will wait.
lawdog1
Supporter
- 59,626
- 71,565
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2000
Blue men’s lows also excluded
- 3,260
- 2,813
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2013
I'm surprised any men's shoes were included at all lol
Ahhh I didn’t see it worked on white lows! 130 ain’t bad!
- 480
- 905
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2021
Bro I had a three year long foot injury after playing a few games in those things. The fourth toe had like a half burning half numb feeling. Lasted at least three years
lawdog1
Supporter
- 59,626
- 71,565
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2000
I passed because I felt weird about being a dude and using the code “women” to get myself a pair of shoes on discount on Women’s History Day.
And also (more so) because my size was sold out
- 5,279
- 9,684
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2018
Any word on this years Quai or FIBA?
- 2,878
- 8,632
- Joined
- May 30, 2018
don't think Quai54 will drop
- 3,404
- 6,550
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2020
- 2,878
- 8,632
- Joined
- May 30, 2018
Promo sample that never made it.
Promo Sample isn't the "reason" not release to public, simply just a production-stage word, the final "release" decision basically made by marketing team.
Release colors have Promo Samples as well, simply just promo tagged.
But yeah, normally not releasing colors are promo samples, but opposite, promo samples won't necessary not releasing.
- 2,878
- 8,632
- Joined
- May 30, 2018
def a GO, since Undft pair has addition camo layer under the mesh.
- 2,878
- 8,632
- Joined
- May 30, 2018
