- 2,702
- 12
- Joined
- May 3, 2007
In my sport sociology class we chose from a list of topics to debate. I immediately picked "Are athletes overpaid?" and I'm taking thenegative position, saying they are not overpaid. Granted this topic is as broad as an ocean because it doesnt specify which sport, USA or whole world, allathletes or just top athletes etc.
I'm choosing to have my group focus on the top 4 major American sports (MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA)
However, I still think there is overwhelming evidence to say athletes are NOT overpaid, including:
1 - Player salaries (minimum and maximum) as well as salary cap and floor are negotiated between the league and the player's union. The pay rates are basedupon giving the players a percentage of all the money the league makes. So say if the NFL rakes in 100 million next year, the players get 60% or 60 million(obviously that's oversimplified).
2 - Supply and demand. This is a free market economy and if a team or the league decides to pay a player millions, so be it.
3 - They aren't just playing a sport. Most athletes are held to very strict contracts that control their behaviors during the season. Few other jobs forceyou to keep in such good shape as most athletes must (this aint no 9-5).
4 - They are often forced to film commercials, appear at events and take interviews with the media according to their contract. If they refuse to talk to themedia when the league tells them to they can be fined.
5 - Short career span. Most athletes retire in their late 30's if they're lucky. After that they have to find another career or hope they investedright.
6 - Physical toll - many athletes suffer mental and physical trauma that they have to deal with for the rest of their lives (see: #3).
7 - Very few players are paid millions like Alex Rodriguez etc. The rest have to struggle with trying to make the roster. How the teams/leagues decide to splitthe money they spend is their business.
And I'm working on more...
What do you think?
Any strong opinions in either side of the debate are appreciated.
I'm choosing to have my group focus on the top 4 major American sports (MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA)
However, I still think there is overwhelming evidence to say athletes are NOT overpaid, including:
1 - Player salaries (minimum and maximum) as well as salary cap and floor are negotiated between the league and the player's union. The pay rates are basedupon giving the players a percentage of all the money the league makes. So say if the NFL rakes in 100 million next year, the players get 60% or 60 million(obviously that's oversimplified).
2 - Supply and demand. This is a free market economy and if a team or the league decides to pay a player millions, so be it.
3 - They aren't just playing a sport. Most athletes are held to very strict contracts that control their behaviors during the season. Few other jobs forceyou to keep in such good shape as most athletes must (this aint no 9-5).
4 - They are often forced to film commercials, appear at events and take interviews with the media according to their contract. If they refuse to talk to themedia when the league tells them to they can be fined.
5 - Short career span. Most athletes retire in their late 30's if they're lucky. After that they have to find another career or hope they investedright.
6 - Physical toll - many athletes suffer mental and physical trauma that they have to deal with for the rest of their lives (see: #3).
7 - Very few players are paid millions like Alex Rodriguez etc. The rest have to struggle with trying to make the roster. How the teams/leagues decide to splitthe money they spend is their business.
And I'm working on more...
What do you think?
Any strong opinions in either side of the debate are appreciated.