- 67,617
- 78,666
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
simple explanation...the fix was in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
c. A ball being held by a player: (1) is in the frontcourt if neither the ball nor the player is touching the backcourt, (2) is in the backcourt if either the ball or player is touching the backcourt.
It's a judgment call whether you want to say he had possession or not before he stepped on the line.
But you don't have to step over the line, only have the smallest smidgen of your foot on it, not even cross it, right?
Same with a three point field goal, if your toe is on the line, it's a 2.
Originally Posted by joegolfdad
I have no idea how they overturned it, but it wasn't a backcourt, his foot never crossed the line
Originally Posted by joegolfdad
I have no idea how they overturned it, but it wasn't a backcourt, his foot never crossed the line
c. A ball being held by a player: (1) is in the frontcourt if neither the ball nor the player is touching the backcourt, (2) is in the backcourt if either the ball or player is touching the backcourt.
It's a judgment call whether you want to say he had possession or not before he stepped on the line.
But you don't have to step over the line, only have the smallest smidgen of your foot on it, not even cross it, right?
Same with a three point field goal, if your toe is on the line, it's a 2.
For a violation to occur, both feet and the ball must be established in the frontcourt and then go to the backcourt. In this instance, KD's left foot was on the line when he caught the ball, so he didn't establish position in the front court. Therefore, no violation.
Both feet weren't established? On the replay I knew one foot was, one foot was close, and then on his dribble his foot touched the line. I could be wrong though.
But either way, whether the call was right or not, how can you overturn that?
For a violation to occur, both feet and the ball must be established in the frontcourt and then go to the backcourt. In this instance, KD's left foot was on the line when he caught the ball, so he didn't establish position in the front court. Therefore, no violation.
Both feet weren't established? On the replay I knew one foot was, one foot was close, and then on his dribble his foot touched the line. I could be wrong though.
But either way, whether the call was right or not, how can you overturn that?
Originally Posted by PMatic
I see you took my name out the quote, patna. You better tell em who learned you.
Originally Posted by PMatic
I see you took my name out the quote, patna. You better tell em who learned you.
Was harder to comprehend without watching the video, I started the post without seeing the vid up-close and many times over.Originally Posted by PMatic
So basically what I said.
Was harder to comprehend without watching the video, I started the post without seeing the vid up-close and many times over.Originally Posted by PMatic
So basically what I said.
Originally Posted by MrONegative
Originally Posted by PMatic
I see you took my name out the quote, patna. You better tell em who learned you.
*reads*
Originally Posted by MrONegative
Originally Posted by PMatic
I see you took my name out the quote, patna. You better tell em who learned you.
*reads*