Are you MOM enough? Vol. I have the weirdest wood right now...

k2theablam

k2theablam

5,288
467
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
time-magazine-breastfeeding-cover.jpg

eek.gif
eek.gif
laugh.gif
devil.gif
embarassed.gif
laugh.gif
devil.gif
devil.gif
embarassed.gif
30t6p3b.gif


Article on Yahoo... http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline...r-sparks-immediate-controversy-151539970.html

This week's Time magazine cover features Jamie Lynne Grumet, a 26-year-old woman breastfeeding her three-year-old son. Grumet was one of four mothers photographed by Time for a cover story on "attachment parenting," an approach--outlined by 1992's "The Baby Book" by Dr. Bill Sears--that recommends extended breast-feeding, co-sleeping and "baby wearing."

The provocative cover, published online Thursday, was met with the predictable Twitter jaw-drop.

"Love the Time cover," AllThingsD.com's Peter Kafka wrote. "In the cringiest way possible."

"Anybody else slightly slack-jawed over this week's Time cover?" The Atlantic Wire's Adam Clark Estes rhetorically asked.

"Breastfeeding your 3-year-old is one thing," the Daily News' Bill Hammond wrote. "But putting a picture of him doing it on the cover of Time?"

"Heads up, parents!" John Cannon warned. "If you're planning to take your kids grocery shopping, you will have to explain this Time mag cover."
Click to expand...
 
*cue Terry Richardson pic*

I'm sorry, I feel like these chicks that breast feed their children well past being a toddler are some borderline prevs. They just like to be sucked on all day.

Come at me
 
3 years old? Come the %%%! on. If you're old enough to ask for milk, you shouldn't be getting it out your mom's titty.
 
Originally Posted by Tr1ll

*cue Terry Richardson pic*

I'm sorry, I feel like these chicks that breast feed their children well past being a toddler are some borderline prevs. They just like to be sucked on all day.

Come at me
Click to expand...

It's deeper than that in my opinion... They have issues with their own parents and go too far to try to outdo/do better than them. From what I've seen, it just *%%*+ up their kids though. I know this little weirdo who got breast fed until he was about 3 and I wouldn't be surprised if he turns out to be a serial killer.
 
What if they were trolling the hell out of us, those people aren't related, and they just got away with child porn on their cover?
 
Originally Posted by Tr1ll

*cue Terry Richardson pic*

I'm sorry, I feel like these chicks that breast feed their children well past being a toddler are some borderline prevs. They just like to be sucked on all day.

Come at me
Click to expand...
c1916264b663fef4c43e1b710e45681934876711_r.jpg


  
 
This kid is gonna be messed up when he gets older...you're not supposed to be able to actually recall sucking your moms breast.
30t6p3b.gif
 
Listen...if the moms is eating a healthy diet, and the factory is still full...let that kid do him and the dad.
 
Poor little bastard is gonna end up killing himself from the torture he will undoubtedly experience in school.
Good parenting attention $%#+$.
 
Originally Posted by Dropten

The only perverts here are that ones that view breastfeeding as a sexual act.
Click to expand...
Uh... the kid is three years old. 
So at what age would you consider sucking on a boob a sexual act then?

It might not be perverted, but different people feel differently about this kind of thing than you do. 

It's not on the cover of time magzine because it's cute... I'll tell you that much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom