See thats the problem my friend. Murder is Murder, when you try to figure out a man motivation to kill, you complicate things and humanize a person. There's no accountability in this stupid country anymore and its always someone elses fault as to why people do evil things. Whether he voted for Obama or McCain does not mean a damn thing to that mother who now has to go bury her daughter...............
AZ. Representative shot among others
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by 10littlefigures,
- Start date
See thats the problem my friend. Murder is Murder, when you try to figure out a man motivation to kill, you complicate things and humanize a person. There's no accountability in this stupid country anymore and its always someone elses fault as to why people do evil things. Whether he voted for Obama or McCain does not mean a damn thing to that mother who now has to go bury her daughter...............
- 2,727
- 15
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2008
Does anyone know the motive?
- 2,727
- 15
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2008
Does anyone know the motive?
devildog1776
Banned
- 4,949
- 139
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2008
CIA patsy....
Another event to strip of us of our "liberty". left wing right wing same bird..
He's white so he has mental problems, but if he was any other race he'd be a cold blooded murderer.....
Another event to strip of us of our "liberty". left wing right wing same bird..
He's white so he has mental problems, but if he was any other race he'd be a cold blooded murderer.....
devildog1776
Banned
- 4,949
- 139
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2008
CIA patsy....
Another event to strip of us of our "liberty". left wing right wing same bird..
He's white so he has mental problems, but if he was any other race he'd be a cold blooded murderer.....
Another event to strip of us of our "liberty". left wing right wing same bird..
He's white so he has mental problems, but if he was any other race he'd be a cold blooded murderer.....
superblytrife
Supporter
- 20,961
- 22,507
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2002
Damn.....dude's eyes tell it all. Bat #!@$ crazy.
superblytrife
Supporter
- 20,961
- 22,507
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2002
Damn.....dude's eyes tell it all. Bat #!@$ crazy.
- 12,885
- 2,739
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2001
Technically, this guy is a Terrorist. It was done based on political motives.
But since this country likes to reserve the term 'terrorist' for a man of Middle Eastern decent, he's a just some guy with mental problems who's gone bad. You won't hear the term mentioned once through out this ordeal.
But since this country likes to reserve the term 'terrorist' for a man of Middle Eastern decent, he's a just some guy with mental problems who's gone bad. You won't hear the term mentioned once through out this ordeal.
- 12,885
- 2,739
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2001
Technically, this guy is a Terrorist. It was done based on political motives.
But since this country likes to reserve the term 'terrorist' for a man of Middle Eastern decent, he's a just some guy with mental problems who's gone bad. You won't hear the term mentioned once through out this ordeal.
But since this country likes to reserve the term 'terrorist' for a man of Middle Eastern decent, he's a just some guy with mental problems who's gone bad. You won't hear the term mentioned once through out this ordeal.
- 826
- 10
- Joined
- May 29, 2008
You're so detached from reality I almost feel bad for you... Might want to check into some PTSD treatment.. for real.
- 826
- 10
- Joined
- May 29, 2008
You're so detached from reality I almost feel bad for you... Might want to check into some PTSD treatment.. for real.
- 2,089
- 87
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2005
What I really want to know is why this man is being defended in court. Why does he deserve that right...no, privilege?
Worse yet is the fact that he's being defended by the very same lawyer who defended other notable domestic terrorist. Only upside to this is the possibility that his association with that particular attorney will work to effectively demonize him more--which is good, in my opinion.
...
Since when was having a right to an attorney a privilege? No matter who you are you have the right to counsel and a right to a trial by jury, those aren't things you can just get taken away from you just because of your crime.
- 2,089
- 87
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2005
What I really want to know is why this man is being defended in court. Why does he deserve that right...no, privilege?
Worse yet is the fact that he's being defended by the very same lawyer who defended other notable domestic terrorist. Only upside to this is the possibility that his association with that particular attorney will work to effectively demonize him more--which is good, in my opinion.
...
Since when was having a right to an attorney a privilege? No matter who you are you have the right to counsel and a right to a trial by jury, those aren't things you can just get taken away from you just because of your crime.
- 4,469
- 11
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2010
What I really want to know is why this man is being defended in court. Why does he deserve that right...no, privilege?
Worse yet is the fact that he's being defended by the very same lawyer who defended other notable domestic terrorist. Only upside to this is the possibility that his association with that particular attorney will work to effectively demonize him more--which is good, in my opinion.
...
logout, dont come back
- 4,469
- 11
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2010
What I really want to know is why this man is being defended in court. Why does he deserve that right...no, privilege?
Worse yet is the fact that he's being defended by the very same lawyer who defended other notable domestic terrorist. Only upside to this is the possibility that his association with that particular attorney will work to effectively demonize him more--which is good, in my opinion.
...
logout, dont come back
- 1,826
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2010
Since when was having a right to an attorney a privilege? No matter who you are you have the right to counsel and a right to a trial by jury, those aren't things you can just get taken away from you just because of your crime.Originally Posted by moonmaster3
What I really want to know is why this man is being defended in court. Why does he deserve that right...no, privilege?
Worse yet is the fact that he's being defended by the very same lawyer who defended other notable domestic terrorist. Only upside to this is the possibility that his association with that particular attorney will work to effectively demonize him more--which is good, in my opinion.
...
Terrorists who destroy lives, and in the process, completely disregard the humanity of their direct and indirect victims are not worthy of those inalienable rights we all share/enjoy. The fact that this guy went in there to kill is evidence enough of this. Why must a monster like him be treated like a citizen.
He aint one of us. He aint a law abiding citizen. So why must the law treat him equally? And spare your me w/e moral retort you were planning--if one was in the works, of course.
I mean, really, how nutty is it that an obvious monster like him (after the fact) is worthy of a defense team? Are you friggin serious.
As far as I'm concerned, certain cases/violent acts should result in a forfeit of alienable rights, as polar and contrary as that sounds.
This guy, Timothy McVeigh, the "Unabomber", Bin Laden, Hitler, etc etc -- these are individuals who don't deserve the benefit of a defense.
...
- 1,826
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2010
Since when was having a right to an attorney a privilege? No matter who you are you have the right to counsel and a right to a trial by jury, those aren't things you can just get taken away from you just because of your crime.Originally Posted by moonmaster3
What I really want to know is why this man is being defended in court. Why does he deserve that right...no, privilege?
Worse yet is the fact that he's being defended by the very same lawyer who defended other notable domestic terrorist. Only upside to this is the possibility that his association with that particular attorney will work to effectively demonize him more--which is good, in my opinion.
...
Terrorists who destroy lives, and in the process, completely disregard the humanity of their direct and indirect victims are not worthy of those inalienable rights we all share/enjoy. The fact that this guy went in there to kill is evidence enough of this. Why must a monster like him be treated like a citizen.
He aint one of us. He aint a law abiding citizen. So why must the law treat him equally? And spare your me w/e moral retort you were planning--if one was in the works, of course.
I mean, really, how nutty is it that an obvious monster like him (after the fact) is worthy of a defense team? Are you friggin serious.
As far as I'm concerned, certain cases/violent acts should result in a forfeit of alienable rights, as polar and contrary as that sounds.
This guy, Timothy McVeigh, the "Unabomber", Bin Laden, Hitler, etc etc -- these are individuals who don't deserve the benefit of a defense.
...
- 2,089
- 87
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2005
Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze
Since when was having a right to an attorney a privilege? No matter who you are you have the right to counsel and a right to a trial by jury, those aren't things you can just get taken away from you just because of your crime.Originally Posted by moonmaster3
What I really want to know is why this man is being defended in court. Why does he deserve that right...no, privilege?
Worse yet is the fact that he's being defended by the very same lawyer who defended other notable domestic terrorist. Only upside to this is the possibility that his association with that particular attorney will work to effectively demonize him more--which is good, in my opinion.
...
Terrorists who destroy lives, and in the process, completely disregard the humanity of their direct and indirect victims are not worthy of those inalienable rights we all share/enjoy. The fact that this guy went in there to kill is evidence enough of this. Why must a monster like him be treated like a citizen.
He aint one of us. He aint a law abiding citizen. So why must the law treat him equally? And spare your me w/e moral retort you were planning--if one was in the works, of course.
I mean, really, how nutty is it that an obvious monster like him (after the fact) is worthy of a defense team? Are you friggin serious.
...
So...if it was up to you...we'd basically just shoot the guy in the back of the head or what?
- 2,089
- 87
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2005
Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze
Since when was having a right to an attorney a privilege? No matter who you are you have the right to counsel and a right to a trial by jury, those aren't things you can just get taken away from you just because of your crime.Originally Posted by moonmaster3
What I really want to know is why this man is being defended in court. Why does he deserve that right...no, privilege?
Worse yet is the fact that he's being defended by the very same lawyer who defended other notable domestic terrorist. Only upside to this is the possibility that his association with that particular attorney will work to effectively demonize him more--which is good, in my opinion.
...
Terrorists who destroy lives, and in the process, completely disregard the humanity of their direct and indirect victims are not worthy of those inalienable rights we all share/enjoy. The fact that this guy went in there to kill is evidence enough of this. Why must a monster like him be treated like a citizen.
He aint one of us. He aint a law abiding citizen. So why must the law treat him equally? And spare your me w/e moral retort you were planning--if one was in the works, of course.
I mean, really, how nutty is it that an obvious monster like him (after the fact) is worthy of a defense team? Are you friggin serious.
...
So...if it was up to you...we'd basically just shoot the guy in the back of the head or what?
- 826
- 10
- Joined
- May 29, 2008
Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze
Since when was having a right to an attorney a privilege? No matter who you are you have the right to counsel and a right to a trial by jury, those aren't things you can just get taken away from you just because of your crime.Originally Posted by moonmaster3
What I really want to know is why this man is being defended in court. Why does he deserve that right...no, privilege?
Worse yet is the fact that he's being defended by the very same lawyer who defended other notable domestic terrorist. Only upside to this is the possibility that his association with that particular attorney will work to effectively demonize him more--which is good, in my opinion.
...
Terrorists who destroy lives, and in the process, completely disregard the humanity of their direct and indirect victims are not worthy of those inalienable rights we all share/enjoy. The fact that this guy went in there to kill is evidence enough of this. Why must a monster like him be treated like a citizen.
He aint one of us. He aint a law abiding citizen. So why must the law treat him equally? And spare your me w/e moral retort you were planning--if one was in the works, of course.
I mean, really, how nutty is it that an obvious monster like him (after the fact) is worthy of a defense team? Are you friggin serious.
...
Uhhh.. What?
You ask a question and don't want a response?
Everybody has the right to a fair trail, regardless of what they did.
He'll get his.
- 826
- 10
- Joined
- May 29, 2008
Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze
Since when was having a right to an attorney a privilege? No matter who you are you have the right to counsel and a right to a trial by jury, those aren't things you can just get taken away from you just because of your crime.Originally Posted by moonmaster3
What I really want to know is why this man is being defended in court. Why does he deserve that right...no, privilege?
Worse yet is the fact that he's being defended by the very same lawyer who defended other notable domestic terrorist. Only upside to this is the possibility that his association with that particular attorney will work to effectively demonize him more--which is good, in my opinion.
...
Terrorists who destroy lives, and in the process, completely disregard the humanity of their direct and indirect victims are not worthy of those inalienable rights we all share/enjoy. The fact that this guy went in there to kill is evidence enough of this. Why must a monster like him be treated like a citizen.
He aint one of us. He aint a law abiding citizen. So why must the law treat him equally? And spare your me w/e moral retort you were planning--if one was in the works, of course.
I mean, really, how nutty is it that an obvious monster like him (after the fact) is worthy of a defense team? Are you friggin serious.
...
Uhhh.. What?
You ask a question and don't want a response?
Everybody has the right to a fair trail, regardless of what they did.
He'll get his.
- 1,826
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2010
Originally Posted by moonmaster3
Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze
Since when was having a right to an attorney a privilege? No matter who you are you have the right to counsel and a right to a trial by jury, those aren't things you can just get taken away from you just because of your crime.Originally Posted by moonmaster3
What I really want to know is why this man is being defended in court. Why does he deserve that right...no, privilege?
Worse yet is the fact that he's being defended by the very same lawyer who defended other notable domestic terrorist. Only upside to this is the possibility that his association with that particular attorney will work to effectively demonize him more--which is good, in my opinion.
...
Terrorists who destroy lives, and in the process, completely disregard the humanity of their direct and indirect victims are not worthy of those inalienable rights we all share/enjoy. The fact that this guy went in there to kill is evidence enough of this. Why must a monster like him be treated like a citizen.
He aint one of us. He aint a law abiding citizen. So why must the law treat him equally? And spare your me w/e moral retort you were planning--if one was in the works, of course.
I mean, really, how nutty is it that an obvious monster like him (after the fact) is worthy of a defense team? Are you friggin serious.
...
So...if it was up to you...we'd basically just shoot the guy in the back of the head or what?
Tryna put words in my mouth eehh? Just because I'm against him having so much as a defense team doesn't mean that I think he should be killed.
I'm against the death penalty, if you must know...
People like this, who go out of their way to destroy the fabric of society, deserve to be locked up for life in some hole. That's a punishment worthy enough of a man like this.
Killing him accomplishes nothing.
Depriving him of his rights, however, like that of freedom, accomplishes something.
...
- 1,826
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2010
Originally Posted by moonmaster3
Originally Posted by UnkleTomCruze
Since when was having a right to an attorney a privilege? No matter who you are you have the right to counsel and a right to a trial by jury, those aren't things you can just get taken away from you just because of your crime.Originally Posted by moonmaster3
What I really want to know is why this man is being defended in court. Why does he deserve that right...no, privilege?
Worse yet is the fact that he's being defended by the very same lawyer who defended other notable domestic terrorist. Only upside to this is the possibility that his association with that particular attorney will work to effectively demonize him more--which is good, in my opinion.
...
Terrorists who destroy lives, and in the process, completely disregard the humanity of their direct and indirect victims are not worthy of those inalienable rights we all share/enjoy. The fact that this guy went in there to kill is evidence enough of this. Why must a monster like him be treated like a citizen.
He aint one of us. He aint a law abiding citizen. So why must the law treat him equally? And spare your me w/e moral retort you were planning--if one was in the works, of course.
I mean, really, how nutty is it that an obvious monster like him (after the fact) is worthy of a defense team? Are you friggin serious.
...
So...if it was up to you...we'd basically just shoot the guy in the back of the head or what?
Tryna put words in my mouth eehh? Just because I'm against him having so much as a defense team doesn't mean that I think he should be killed.
I'm against the death penalty, if you must know...
People like this, who go out of their way to destroy the fabric of society, deserve to be locked up for life in some hole. That's a punishment worthy enough of a man like this.
Killing him accomplishes nothing.
Depriving him of his rights, however, like that of freedom, accomplishes something.
...
- 13,094
- 13
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2007
a nine year old girl, im raging so hard right now, how can you aim at a human let alone in the direction of a @*$**$@ kid
hope he burns in eternity
hope he burns in eternity
