- 20,210
- 4,197
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
Originally Posted by 651akathePaul
Tiger is a revolutionist. Big Ben is nowhere near that. The coverage is more than viable.
Tiger Woods is guilty. Big Ben is accused.
If Big Ben is found to be guilty, you can guarantee the coverage picks up.
Dont give me that
Tiger Woods didnt commit a crime
Tiger Woods didnt deserve all that coverage he got. He's not a saint, we got it the first few days.
And you're right...Big Ben is just accused RIGHT NOW but using a bit of logic you have to beleive.... where's there's smoke.... there's fire.... especially the second time.