- 660
- 431
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2014
Well damn...That was quickafew is OOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Well damn...That was quickafew is OOS
did u try to call around to a few of your local FTLs, FNLs, Champs, JJs, HOH, etc? they may have pairs still sitting, or from returns. ive seen people returning em just based off tongues alone lol people be gtting 2 or 3 pairs, picking out the best 2 tongues and returning the restNever did I think I'd have problems trying to cop these. But, here I am. Life's crazy.
FNL Free Me
I had OG Bordeaux's as well (think I was in 6th grade at the time) but I don't even remember what size I wore, so remembering the coloring is out of the question.
Bruh... My perception of what my OG xis looked like vs what they actually look like is probably so inaccurate
There would be a lot of quietShould make a poll of how many people complain about OGs but never had any or are too young to even have purchased an adult pair of OGs back in the day.
not sure why. you dont need to have owned them in order to want them or know what they look like.Should make a poll of how many people complain about OGs but never had any or are too young to even have purchased an adult pair of OGs back in the day.
I think what he's saying is how can you complain about a new shoe that you've held in your hand vs. a shoe you have only seen in pictures. Looking at a pic of a shoe a million times is way different than actually holding it in your hand.not sure why. you dont need to have owned them in order to want them or know what they look like.Should make a poll of how many people complain about OGs but never had any or are too young to even have purchased an adult pair of OGs back in the day.
I think what he's saying is how can you complain about a new shoe that you've held in your hand vs. a shoe you have only seen in pictures. Looking at a pic of a shoe a million times is way different than actually holding it in your hand.
Should make a poll of how many people complain about OGs but never had any or are too young to even have purchased an adult pair of OGs back in the day.
not sure why. you dont need to have owned them in order to want them or know what they look like.
because these arent items from the 1800s where the only available photos are grainy pictures from history books or paintings. we have lots of high resolution photos and video, not to mention the ability to see and hold them at sneaker cons and such.
I think what he's saying is how can you complain about a new shoe that you've held in your hand vs. a shoe you have only seen in pictures. Looking at a pic of a shoe a million times is way different than actually holding it in your hand.
I think what he's saying is how can you complain about a new shoe that you've held in your hand vs. a shoe you have only seen in pictures. Looking at a pic of a shoe a million times is way different than actually holding it in your hand.
because these arent items from the 1800s where the only available photos are grainy pictures from history books or paintings. we have lots of high resolution photos and video, not to mention the ability to see and hold them at sneaker cons and such.
unless youre a native american child in the early americas relying on spoken word to acquire history, playing blind man is silly.
Have a good day man.because these arent items from the 1800s where the only available photos are grainy pictures from history books or paintings. we have lots of high resolution photos and video, not to mention the ability to see and hold them at sneaker cons and such.
I think what he's saying is how can you complain about a new shoe that you've held in your hand vs. a shoe you have only seen in pictures. Looking at a pic of a shoe a million times is way different than actually holding it in your hand.
unless youre a native american child in the early americas relying on spoken word to acquire history, playing blind man is silly.
Preach!!!!Playing blind man to what? People are complaining about hole patterns and slight shades. It's petty.
It's even worse when they complain about stuff that was actually on the OG but not on the previous retro. Shows ignorance at its finest.
to pictures, videos, comparisons, and seeing/holding them in person - basically every way in which it's possible way to get a sense of an item.Playing blind man to what? People are complaining about hole patterns and slight shades. It's petty.
It's even worse when they complain about stuff that was actually on the OG but not on the previous retro. Shows ignorance at its finest.
Playing blind man to what? People are complaining about hole patterns and slight shades. It's petty.
It's even worse when they complain about stuff that was actually on the OG but not on the previous retro. Shows ignorance at its finest.
to pictures, videos, comparisons, and seeing/holding them in person - basically every way in which it's possible way to get a sense of an item.
people are complaining about a lot more then perfs and shade of colors (which are no less plain as day and no less worth complaining about), such as the overall clunky looking mold/shape and a toebox bump that borders on straight-up defect. i mean when the little details are lacking and the big structural aspects are lacking, it's not petty at all to complain about.
I actually had these OGs when i was in 7th grade and i know the grey midsole part was lighter than whats on these 2015 retros, so to me thats whats makes them not as on point.....just my opinion
Never did I think I'd have problems trying to cop these. But, here I am. Life's crazy.
Never did I think I'd have problems trying to cop these. But, here I am. Life's crazy.
What on earth were you doing this whole week???
These were EVERYWHERE
If you haven't received email from FNL about shipping chances are you won't receive shoes. Just received email at work saying they over sold by 1600 pairs and are contacting stores to see if they still have pairs to fulfill orders.