- 6,754
- 1,215
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
Brady and co. have some work to do. Buffalo is looking pretty solid in this game even without Lynch
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
Originally Posted by airblaster503
The point though that Gunna is making is that he doesn't go up against the same coverages at great wide recievers, not the numbers he puts up. Any good reciever with a good qb playing slot should be able to put up those numbers when being matched up on linebackers.
thats why I stopped responding to him wayyy back, cus its obvious he doesnt/didnt understand the point being made.
How about that 3rd and 15 that Buffalo converted? Their defense is playing like $%%+ out there.Originally Posted by CasperJr
@ that call NE got %%+@#@ over
Originally Posted by LiL Stevie728
Alex Van Pelt is on point right now!
Originally Posted by YaBoyDiddy
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
Originally Posted by airblaster503
The point though that Gunna is making is that he doesn't go up against the same coverages at great wide recievers, not the numbers he puts up. Any good reciever with a good qb playing slot should be able to put up those numbers when being matched up on linebackers.
thats why I stopped responding to him wayyy back, cus its obvious he doesnt/didnt understand the point being made.
That's false. Playing the Pats u now how big Welker is in that Offense so you're not stickin no LB on him unless you're playing Zone. The same stuff Welker runs Moss runs too. It's the Offense; get the ball out, keep Brady clean.
the spot they gave them was actually insulting to my intelligence
@%!%$# dumb !!% Mckelvin
didnt the Bills snatch defeat from the jaws of victory vs the cowboys last tiem they played on primetime?