- 25,137
- 13,173
- Joined
- May 30, 2006
![laugh.gif](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ezboard.com%2Fimages%2Femoticons%2Flaugh.gif&hash=a7cd657a88b2816618cd293da089fa36)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Imo whoever they draft they are going to need to get make a trade.They need beasley more than rose. if they get rose they will have to trade some of their players and that might make them worse. taking beasley will give them inside presence. now they can just get rid of gooden or ty thomas to bring in a veteran and they should be good to go. i see the bulls 3rd or 4th in the east next year
Why you remind me 11 million a year for 15 and 6?Originally Posted by Nowitness41Dirk
Nobody wants Kirk's contract... Sorry Bulls fans...![]()
A more athletic D-Will is what I see in him, meaning, if all goes to plan (and he develops just as Deron did + extra athleticism) once the batch of old guys retires (Kidd, Nash, ect) he could be a #2 point gaurd in the league, which is saying a lot.
And with Beasley I see a lot of Melo, but more posted, and maybe a better rebounder... its hard to say...
With draft picks, you have a ceiling and a basement. How good they could get, or how bad they could be....
Rose's ceiling is like Wade with a better stroke, better handles, better passing, and better rebounding (Ceiling mind you). His basement it two words. Antonio Daniels.
Beasley's ceiling is a more built, more determined, better rebounding, better defending Carmelo Anthony. His basement is Derrick Coleman.
So there is a risk with each of them. Last year, they did the smart thing with the top pick and took a guy with a higher basement at number 1 (Greg Oden, at worst, is Mutumbo. At best he is David Robinson 2.0) instead of a guy who could really turn out to be not much (Durant at worst is a poorer shooting Rashard Lewis, even though at best he is...well hes something new if he really pans out, which seems likely now for the ROY)
So if I am the Bulls, I probably take Rose, for a lot of reasons. He suits a need, hes a hometown guy to energize the city, he will at least be a serviceable PG and someone who can start in the league for many years, and probably play some decent defense and score a good amount. Beasley, even though he has grown up A LOT recently, still has the old label of "character problems", and if he felt like it, could end up doing little to nothing at all in the league. I doubt he will though, I see them both being quiet good, just I would take Rose.
I felt like I was the only one who thought this. I cosign your whole post. They dont need PFs or PGs, so why make the pick? Would it make more sense tomake the pick, and then subsequently trade a few of the excess players they have at that position? Or package the #1 and one or two of their guys for asuperstar? Id definitely choose the latter. And are the Bulls starting to see Deng really isnt that good? Just to think they could have had Kobe.......Originally Posted by CROSSISOM
The truth is, the Bulls don't need another PG or PF/SF.
It's plenty of talent in Chicago, so I'd actually trade my pick and somebody else for something they actually need.
On a side note, why do they keep such a tight grip on Deng? I don't see what's so special about the guy.
m just saying that Beasley is a scorer and wont be a rebounding/defensive threat in the league
im sorry but beasley is a fricken rebounding machine. That wont be a problem on the next level.
The only time I really saw Beasley struggle was against Iowa State for some reason. The played him in a two three most of the game and forced him to shootjumpers so he ONLY ended up with like 15 and 10. That is the dude struggling.
Originally Posted by CROSSISOM
The truth is, the Bulls don't need another PG or PF/SF.
It's plenty of talent in Chicago, so I'd actually trade my pick and somebody else for something they actually need.
On a side note, why do they keep such a tight grip on Deng? I don't see what's so special about the guy.
Originally Posted by NobleKane
Im telling you if the bulls pick rose it will be a big mistake....
hometown kid meet that hometown pressure equal kwame brown point guard version....
hometown kid meet that hometown pressure equal kwame brown point guard version....
![]()
Im glad Miami doesn't have to do much but sit back and watch the chips fall
![]()
Originally Posted by dland24
I felt like I was the only one who thought this. I cosign your whole post. They dont need PFs or PGs, so why make the pick? Would it make more sense to make the pick, and then subsequently trade a few of the excess players they have at that position? Or package the #1 and one or two of their guys for a superstar? Id definitely choose the latter. And are the Bulls starting to see Deng really isnt that good? Just to think they could have had Kobe.......Originally Posted by CROSSISOM
The truth is, the Bulls don't need another PG or PF/SF.
It's plenty of talent in Chicago, so I'd actually trade my pick and somebody else for something they actually need.
On a side note, why do they keep such a tight grip on Deng? I don't see what's so special about the guy.
You could put this into the Bulls thread or the Draft thread.
Thanks.