teets21:
it was on ESPN about a week after the Mitchell Report came out. He never said Roger was innocent but in a nutshell said that if anyone was gonna do steriods they would go through him so he highly doubted that he did them. I'm not saying that Canseco is the be all and end all on the topic.
I'm not gonna lie, it's really no big secret with baseball players.
O.K., I remember what you're talking about with Canseco; he said he was surprised to see Clemens' name in the report, and that hedoesn't know how his name got there.
But the fact that Canseco is befuddled means nothing to me; Canseco can't cconvince me that he knows with 100 confidence that a specific player DIDN'Tuse; he can only convince me that he knows with 100% confidence that a specific player DID.
So him saying 'McGwire definitely did. I know it' means something; him saying 'Clemens didn't. I know it' means nothing.
And no, it really is no secret that the MLB is comprised of a bunch of cheating 'roiders, and that's why there's not much Clemens can do toconvince me (or most) that he's innocent. We're cognizant that the MLB is still on the tail end of The Steroid Era, so anytime a name comes up, thatguy is going to have to work his tail off to prove his innocence.
As an example, I don't think Griffey has used anything. I didn't think so a couple years ago, BEFORE all of this started blowing up. But now thatwe've gone a couple years with his name STILL being left out of every discussion, it just further solidifies that he's used anything. You know what itwould take to shake the confidence of myself and others like me?
One mention.
We know that MLB is heavily tainted, so it's like, no one is free from accusation. No one. And as confident as I am that Griffey is clean, if his name werementioned by someone with credibility on this issue (like Canseco, Mitchell, or McNamee), my confidence would be shaken.
So it's not about people wanting Clemens to be guilty so much as it people refusing to be blinded by his faultydefense in the face of strong evidence.