It's not important that I call this "terrorism" or an act of. It's more of a macro sentiment than anything else.
My issue is that acts similar to what this dude did is easily called an act of "terrorism", but only under the guise of careful particular inculcated media agendas.
Which perpetuates a negative image or reputation of people following a certain religion.
My main point is, what make this so different than what I've mentioned before? I know someone here suggested what I wanted to say would be "outlandish". I think it's a fair argument and something that should be discussed openly. Not sure why he'd think the former.
We don't have to derail this thread and go off on that tangent, but it's just something that has always bugged me recently. And it bothers me see the double standard happen, especially here in NT where some of the most intelligent people contribute to this community.