- Jun 1, 2003
- 5,132
- 843
He wasn't cool w/ having a super kid sprung on him so he went the deadbeat dad routeWhat's Supes deal with the clone other than Supes being a *****?Its been done in Books and TV...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He wasn't cool w/ having a super kid sprung on him so he went the deadbeat dad routeWhat's Supes deal with the clone other than Supes being a *****?Its been done in Books and TV...
MILLER: When people come out with movies about characters I’ve worked on, I always hate them. I have my own ideas about what the characters are like. I mean, I can’t watch a Batman movie. I’ve seen pieces of them, but I generally think, No, that’s not him. And I walk out of the theater before it’s over.
PLAYBOY: Does that include the Christopher Nolan Batman movies?
MILLER: It includes all of them. I’m not condemning what he does. I don’t even understand it, except that he seems to think he owns the title Dark Knight. [laughs] He’s about 20 years too late for that. It’s been used.
Umm.. Miller does know that the moniker, "Dark Knight" predates him by 40+ years, right?MILLER: When people come out with movies about characters I’ve worked on, I always hate them. I have my own ideas about what the characters are like. I mean, I can’t watch a Batman movie. I’ve seen pieces of them, but I generally think, No, that’s not him. And I walk out of the theater before it’s over.
PLAYBOY: Does that include the Christopher Nolan Batman movies?
MILLER: It includes all of them. I’m not condemning what he does. I don’t even understand it, except that he seems to think he owns the title Dark Knight. [laughs] He’s about 20 years too late for that. It’s been used.
That's not what Miler said. He didn't actually get in to why he doesn't like Nolan's version. He did mention how he really tried to bank off of the Dark Knight moniker.Umm.. Miller does know that the moniker, "Dark Knight" predates him by 40+ years, right?MILLER: When people come out with movies about characters I’ve worked on, I always hate them. I have my own ideas about what the characters are like. I mean, I can’t watch a Batman movie. I’ve seen pieces of them, but I generally think, No, that’s not him. And I walk out of the theater before it’s over.
PLAYBOY: Does that include the Christopher Nolan Batman movies?
MILLER: It includes all of them. I’m not condemning what he does. I don’t even understand it, except that he seems to think he owns the title Dark Knight. [laughs] He’s about 20 years too late for that. It’s been used.
There are many legitimate reasons for not liking Nolan's trilogy, but titling the second and third installments with "The Dark Knight" is not one them.
I understand he made very popular titles(Year one and Returns)he acts like he owns batman or the dark knight name. Nolan made batman even more popular with those Flims.Frank Miller interview with playboy, talks about his Batman portrayed in film and how Nolan's version is incomprehensible to him:
He doesn't own it. He's just not being modest about the fact that the Batman everybody knows today that's so popular and iconic is based off of his run and his interpretation of the character so in that sense there is some ownership. Damn near every writer in different mediums are channeling Frank Miller's Batman when they write Batman stories.I understand he made very popular titles(Year one and Returns)he acts like he owns batman or the dark knight name. Nolan made batman even more popular with those Flims.Frank Miller interview with playboy, talks about his Batman portrayed in film and how Nolan's version is incomprehensible to him:
That's cool to have that opinion. I don't enjoy all his work either. Don't change the fact that he created the definitive take on Batman.To me and some can come at me but Millers Batman work is wack.
What saved his uninspired and unfinished All Star Batman was Jim Lees legendary work.
What has Nolan done to think he "owns" it? Did he trademark it or something?PLAYBOY: Does that include the Christopher Nolan Batman movies?
MILLER: It includes all of them. I’m not condemning what he does. I don’t even understand it, except that he seems to think he owns the title Dark Knight. [laughs] He’s about 20 years too late for that. It’s been used.
Some Justice League rumors as wellIn yet another interview with a Brazilian website, Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson has talked more about taking on a role in Shazam for Warner Bros. and DC Comics. Unfortunately, we're once again relying on Google Translate, but it's not too hard to figure out what the wrestler turned actor told Omelette when they caught up with him during his recent promotional tour for Hercules. "My trip to Comic-Con was a surprise, so I called personally to executives at New Line and Warner Bros. to see if they would like to announce Shazam me there. Unfortunately, it was not time yet, but the official announcement should happen soon." Of course, we're hearing an awful lot of talk about Shazam and not much else as of right now, so is it ever really going to happen?
"I am 100% sure that the movie will happen We're talking about it since 2008, when I was offered the role for the first time was just a matter of finding the right script, and it finally happened now," Johnson promised. "We have a writer who understood the story and brought an amazing approach not only to Shazam, but the power of Black Adam as well." Here's where things get a little confusing though. After reiterating that Johnson has not yet chosen between playing the hero or villain, they add that Johnson, "concluded by suggesting that the film will seek a kind of balance between these two antagonistic characters," and that "the film will be part of the ad leads to adaptations of superheroes from DC, which should happen soon." It's believed that an official announcement WILL be coming later this month, and with The Rock talking so much about the role recently, hopefully we'll get that press release ASAP...
Read more at http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=106289#pKLqf1wuF1hOeSSd.99
Badass Digest have been dropping a lot of superhero and Star Wars scoops recently, perhaps in a bid to give Latino-Review a run for their money. Either way, their report on Scoot McNairy and his snazzy green CGI socks offers up some possible details on the members of the Justice League who we will see assemble in Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice. The site can't confirm either way whether the Argo star will indeed be playing Barry Allen (or even Wally West as Barry currently has his own TV series), but their sources apparently tell them that The Flash will indeed make an appearance in the movie, and that, "by the end of the movie we have a Justice League assembled that includes Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Cyborg, The Flash." Wait a second, what about Green Lantern? His 2011 movie may have been a flop, but fans are expecting to see one of the ring wielders make an appearance in Batman V Superman or Justice League. Well, according to those same sources, we won't see a Green Lantern until Zack Snyder's Justice League, while that is a little disappointing, it's likely because they want to spend a decent amount of time reintroducing the character. What do you guys think?
Read more at http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=106283#gb5MIWqZPHfaSpw6.99
Man, they got me to the point where whatever they need to do to get the suit lighter, I'm on board.At least it makes the suit lighter?
GoodStill no red undies though
Good