I'm establishing the fact that villains lie and are untrustworthy/immoral and heroes should not be taking their advice or suggestions when they're in the midst of destroying the planet.
To say Superman should take Zod's word that he has to kill him to stop him is stupid nonsense. Its super lazy reasoning
So you are a liar.
If you really got time got back and read those MoS arguments.
You not gonna waste my time trying to get me to repeat myself.
Zik from 2013 and onward if you want those answers.
Yes because Zod is so use to being blind, so use to that pain that things would be no different if he had eyes
This is an assumption that he doesnt know how to do it.
That's like if i said Superman should've just grabbed him and flew him up in the sky and then you saying how does Superman know he can fly.
Lets be serious.
Mans spent decades as a bum wandering the world. He got acquainted with his powerset.
No they aren't.
Supes was playing around holding his head as Zod slowly turned to that family. He not only had the time to punch him but with his arm around his neck he could've also just headbutted his face in to the floor.
Yeah cuz Superman cant move at super speed.
What the **** are you talking about here?
Nothing in this sentence makes any sense.
What destruction argument? What are you talking about?
The statement is Superman is capable of finding solutions to threats (Zod) without relying on murder and destruction.
Do you know what that means? I'm basically saying Superman can stop bad guys without killing them. Even super powered bad guys.
Rewatch the movie and that entire fight scene while you're also looking for the thread to the other ways Superman could've stopped Zod.
Maybe you'll figure it out.
You're boring me with the made up **** and close minded there was no other way reasoning.