jpzx
Supporter
- 56,263
- 25,923
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
Not PPR....standard scoring format.
Dead. Lock.
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by jpzx,
- Start date
- 3,238
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2007
I stand by my pick
jose cansec0
Banned
- 1,174
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2009
Not PPR....standard scoring format
I stand by my pick
in that case no...R-E-A-C-H
- 25,137
- 13,173
- Joined
- May 30, 2006
Meh... 1300 yards and 10+ TDs isn't exactly a reach.. Which of these RBs are you highly confident in getting those numbers from?
MJD maybe, but anyone else is sketchy... 4 might be early, but picking in that spot he wasn't getting another shot at him... Running back is always deepnow with everybody going 2-backs now..
MJD maybe, but anyone else is sketchy... 4 might be early, but picking in that spot he wasn't getting another shot at him... Running back is always deepnow with everybody going 2-backs now..
- 37
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2004
Why did I get taken out?! The hell?!
jpzx
Supporter
- 56,263
- 25,923
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
- 15,468
- 4,700
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2007
I got a PM asking to take over for dude with the 5th pick
So Ima go with
So Ima go with
- 4,058
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
hold on so what is this standard scoring? Is this the kind of players youd want to draft for a fantasy football league, or actually starting up a team like thebball one was?
and this isnt going to be an actual fantasy football league?
and this isnt going to be an actual fantasy football league?
jpzx
Supporter
- 56,263
- 25,923
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
All the info for this thread has been on the first page since I started this thread....kinda obvious you didn't read it though.
You're not in it anymore kid....Originally Posted by nikeairkeis
With the 6th pick, I select.
Maurice Jones-Drew.
- 37
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2004
With the 6th pick, I select.
Maurice Jones-Drew.
Maurice Jones-Drew.
- 4,058
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
- 37
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2004
Why is that?!
jpzx
Supporter
- 56,263
- 25,923
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
nah i did read it, i just had some questions.
You said we wont be carrying this into like an actual fantasy football league, correct?
and if so i dont get what standard scoring is. Is the players we draft players that we would draft in a fantasy football league (probably putting emphasis on RBs) or players that we would want to draft to start up a franchise with (probably a QB in that case) kind of like what they did in the basketball draft thread.
And also if it is like fantasy, we are doing team defenses/ST correct? and not like defensive players or picking a guy like Devin Hester for his returning abilities.
1. We won't be carrying this into an actual league, this is just for fun and to get you ready for your draft(s).
2. Look up standard scoring....it's like 6 pts for TDs, 4 Pts for TD pass, etc. I can't explain it all. This is just fantasy football, you're notgoing to be carrying it on elsewhere.
3. Yep, Defense/ST. If you drafted the Bears you'd get Hester.
I usually don't like to "discriminate" against people with low post counts or people I haven't seen but in this case I kind ofneed to. I haven't seen you around much and I'm trying to make this thing move fast therefore I can't trust people that are not regulars to be hereon a consistent basis. Sorry
- 4,058
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
1. We won't be carrying this into an actual league, this is just for fun and to get you ready for your draft(s).
2. Look up standard scoring....it's like 6 pts for TDs, 4 Pts for TD pass, etc. I can't explain it all. This is just fantasy football, you're not going to be carrying it on elsewhere.
3. Yep, Defense/ST. If you drafted the Bears you'd get Hester.
I usually don't like to "discriminate" against people with low post counts or people I haven't seen but in this case I kind of need to. I haven't seen you around much and I'm trying to make this thing move fast therefore I can't trust people that are not regulars to be here on a consistent basis. Sorry
aiight thanks, good looks
- 6,599
- 439
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2009
fell asleep last night...
my bad, dam...
my bad, dam...
- 4,058
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
Yes as in retire, and you can qoute it all you want. Brett Favre will not win a Superbowl make the playoffs with the Vikings.
fixed
and no there chances are not higher, Brett Favre is a lame and he is a bum now i watched him in NY bum it out HARD with the Jets last season and i am ecstaticthat he came back so that the Bears can continue to dominate him once again
sorry for bringing that back but i was just looking through the old pages of this thread
- 4,876
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
Bears aint going anywhere either homeboy.
The Vikings would make it before the Bears. But the Packers got the North.
The Vikings would make it before the Bears. But the Packers got the North.
jpzx
Supporter
- 56,263
- 25,923
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
You're both fighting for 2nd.
- 4,058
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
We had a better record last season, and got Cutler.
btw Cutler > Rodgers, and yall dont got a RB like Forte either to help him out
- 4,876
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
Again you have the same problem as the Vikings. You have no WR's, your recievers are worse then the Vikings.
Your Defense is old with no secondary. Peterson > Forte so il give you 3rd place on lock.
And no Cutler is not better then Rodgers.
Rodgers did so well for his first year starting, i cant wait to see his second year.
Only player to have 4000 yards passing in his first year starting
Your Defense is old with no secondary. Peterson > Forte so il give you 3rd place on lock.
And no Cutler is not better then Rodgers.
Rodgers did so well for his first year starting, i cant wait to see his second year.
Only player to have 4000 yards passing in his first year starting
- 4,058
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
yeah but Cutler eclipsed 4500 yards
and also we can argue who is betetr Cutler/rodgers all day, but think that Bears, vikes, or Pack fans can all admit that Cutler/forte is the best QB/RB comboin the NFC North, maybe the league. You can argue Cutler/Rodgers but the Pack dont have a RB like Forte. Thna you can argue Peterson/Forte but if you think a57 year old Favre is anywhere near the level of an up and coming 25 year old QB who threw for 4500 yeatrds last season, youre delusional. There is a reason whymad teams sought after Cutler while the Vikings were the only team willing to take Favre out of his 17th retirement
and i hate how people call our WRs bad. how can you tell if a WR is bad when they have never played/never played with a legit QB. Earl Bennett was a rookie lstyear and its his first year starting so how in the world have you seen him enough to call him bad? And Hester showed signs last year going for over 500 yardsand he started for less than half the season, he is becoming a good route runner and has tons of speed. Its gonna be his 1st year starting as well and he hadKyle "cant throw long" Orton last year... how can he be considered bad? Also forte is probably the best pass catching RB in football and Olsen isbecoming Cutlers favorite target a TE and Des Clark does his thing as well, so i wouldnt say he has no targets.
and our D has only looked bad brcause weve had no offense. Last time our offense was functional enough to actually move the ball a little was whenn we hadTommy /jones and went to the Superbowl. I f our D stays healthy well be fine. We have some nice up and coming players in the secondary (Dannieal Manning andKevin Payne will suprise people), and when heathy we have a great front 4 our ends are great and there arent too many DTs better than Tommy Harris is hes readyto go. and you still couldnt find abetter LB combo than Briggs/urlacher. our D will step it up again. And out ST is top notch.
- 4,876
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2007
We can make comparisons all you want. But the Packers were 8th in the NFL in total Offense last year.
Vikings were in the middle and Bears were dam near last.
You can say you made additions but the Packers Offense will only be better with Rodgers gaining exp. and if the WR core stays healthy
Vikings were in the middle and Bears were dam near last.
You can say you made additions but the Packers Offense will only be better with Rodgers gaining exp. and if the WR core stays healthy
- 8,184
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2008
1. Pack
2. Lions
4. Vikes
4. Bears
2. Lions
4. Vikes
4. Bears
- 15,468
- 4,700
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2007
Lions 2nd!? Lmao
jpzx
Supporter
- 56,263
- 25,923
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
O RLY?