Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Uh, no. He is not better than Paul now, healthy or otherwise. And no one can prove he is better at ANYTHING, unless you're using bogus arbitrary analysis or pointing to wins, although wins are a function of a TEAM. And don't tell me he is a better "driver"or finisher either, CP is hitting 72% of his shots at the rim, Rose 61%.Originally Posted by abovelegit1
Uh, no. He is not better than Paul now, healthy or otherwise. And no one can prove he is better at ANYTHING, unless you're using bogus arbitrary analysis or pointing to wins, although wins are a function of a TEAM. And don't tell me he is a better "driver"or finisher either, CP is hitting 72% of his shots at the rim, Rose 61%.Originally Posted by abovelegit1
Originally Posted by amel223
Uh, no. He is not better than Paul now, healthy or otherwise. And no one can prove he is better at ANYTHING, unless you're using bogus arbitrary analysis or pointing to wins, although wins are a function of a TEAM. And don't tell me he is a better "driver"or finisher either, CP is hitting 72% of his shots at the rim, Rose 61%.Originally Posted by abovelegit1
Originally Posted by amel223
Uh, no. He is not better than Paul now, healthy or otherwise. And no one can prove he is better at ANYTHING, unless you're using bogus arbitrary analysis or pointing to wins, although wins are a function of a TEAM. And don't tell me he is a better "driver"or finisher either, CP is hitting 72% of his shots at the rim, Rose 61%.Originally Posted by abovelegit1
By utilizing a bunch of arbitrary analysis, you may be able to intuit that Paul is the inferior player. The tough thing about being an empiricist is that if you're wrong, you can be proven so. The nice thing about being an intuitionist (i.e Rose fan-boys) is that nobody can prove anything.Originally Posted by abovelegit1
Originally Posted by amel223
Uh, no. He is not better than Paul now, healthy or otherwise. And no one can prove he is better at ANYTHING, unless you're using bogus arbitrary analysis or pointing to wins, although wins are a function of a TEAM. And don't tell me he is a better "driver"or finisher either, CP is hitting 72% of his shots at the rim, Rose 61%.Originally Posted by abovelegit1
You're part of the underwhelming minority that believes this.
Amare shoots over 50 percent from three. Does that mean he's a better 3 pt shooter than Chris Paul?
By utilizing a bunch of arbitrary analysis, you may be able to intuit that Paul is the inferior player. The tough thing about being an empiricist is that if you're wrong, you can be proven so. The nice thing about being an intuitionist (i.e Rose fan-boys) is that nobody can prove anything.Originally Posted by abovelegit1
Originally Posted by amel223
Uh, no. He is not better than Paul now, healthy or otherwise. And no one can prove he is better at ANYTHING, unless you're using bogus arbitrary analysis or pointing to wins, although wins are a function of a TEAM. And don't tell me he is a better "driver"or finisher either, CP is hitting 72% of his shots at the rim, Rose 61%.Originally Posted by abovelegit1
You're part of the underwhelming minority that believes this.
Amare shoots over 50 percent from three. Does that mean he's a better 3 pt shooter than Chris Paul?
Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
I could of sworn that people knew that the top 3 drivers in the league were Lebron, Wade, and Rose (special mention to Westbrook), in what ever order you want to put them.
Originally Posted by thesimplestlife
I could of sworn that people knew that the top 3 drivers in the league were Lebron, Wade, and Rose (special mention to Westbrook), in what ever order you want to put them.
I still don't see why people think Paul is better offensively than Rose.
I always thought shooting and passing were pretty major aspects of offense, but what do I know.
I still don't see why people think Paul is better offensively than Rose.
I always thought shooting and passing were pretty major aspects of offense, but what do I know.