- Apr 25, 2005
- 33,428
- 39,205
That elephant print placement looks so forced. I photoshopped the changes i would have made to them
This shoe looks better without that middle elephant print piece on Don's version.
Don C's Legacy 312, His Own Jordan Silhouette | July 14
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by drewswish,
- Start date
This shoe looks better without that middle elephant print piece on Don's version.
- Jul 18, 2016
- 1,107
- 1,269
I think these are weak but the resell will be enormous because Don is that dude.
- Sep 22, 2014
- 13,567
- 12,122
But JB has already done the fusion thing and literally drove it into the ground (with the countless cws of AF 1 fusions, especially). I can’t see Jordan fusions making a comeback, tbh, people have grown to really hate them over time and they’ve all basically become “poor man’s retro Jordans.”
- Apr 25, 2005
- 33,428
- 39,205
I've always hated them.
- Sep 22, 2014
- 13,567
- 12,122
Haha yeah but I’m even talking about people who willingly bought them back then. I’m yet to see a single person say they like those shoes (to be fair, maybe they are too embarrassed to admit this).
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,048
- 24,223
- Mar 14, 2018
- 2,343
- 3,072
don cheadle's? the war machine dude
- Aug 15, 2012
- 390
- 144
Nike been riding the Yeezy wave for a decade now. It's whatever tho, Vigil bout to make LV x Nike. Can't complain.
- Apr 23, 2015
- 8,799
- 10,386
Thats not how the paneling works. The toe rand is the same piece as the side where the laceholes are. If you put EP there you need to do the whole panel. Which would then make it look like ****, which is why he didnt do it.
That elephant print placement looks so forced. I photoshopped the changes i would have made to them
- Jun 7, 2014
- 2,557
- 1,423
So these Nike’s or Jordan’s?
- Jun 11, 2016
- 671
- 442
I'm convinced don c is really a middle aged female
- Mar 17, 2011
- 1,570
- 915
****IN LAME
- Mar 24, 2008
- 2,253
- 665
rather have spizikez 
- Jun 27, 2009
- 9,805
- 30,047
- Nov 18, 2000
- 12,420
- 6,898
coming from someone that loves the air revolution and late 80s/early 90s bball shoes, I just can't find a way to like these. they look better in the new pictures and in some other color ways, just not enough to warrant a purchase.
Lake Shore Drive
formerly slp product
- Feb 8, 2005
- 7,336
- 2,445
Not worth the future discounted outlet price.
- Apr 10, 2017
- 112
- 82
i don't know guys...i kinda really like them. might be the beer googles but i kinda love them. Of course they're gonna come out in limited quantities so it'll suddenly be the newest hyped shoe though... same thing happened with the tinker 3s to me
- Mar 14, 2018
- 2,343
- 3,072
not bad to be honest.
- May 13, 2005
- 1,360
- 1,709
Just so people don’t say i switched up.. i mess wit them
- Dec 29, 2017
- 1,490
- 2,705
Nah b
- Feb 22, 2013
- 5,859
- 9,405
- Apr 22, 2012
- 85,295
- 114,822
I'll take a 9.5
- Dec 13, 2003
- 4,602
- 1,923
I like this silo a LOT, but the color ways gotta really bring it. Simple color blocking will be better on these.
rbk93
Supporter
- Jun 29, 2016
- 14,402
- 13,770
Dial back on the branding.
j mobile
Supporter
- Oct 26, 2014
- 4,941
- 14,436
There really is a lot going on with these. NA on tongue, Wings Logo, Nike on forefoot strap, NA on heal, Swoosh with Elephant print strip right below it, and not to mention a leather upper, rubber forefoot strap, plastic Jordan 3 eyelets and back heel tab, and nylon Jordan 1 tongue with flat laces. But like I've said before, I'm intrigued by these. In particular, the Lakers colorway. I also want to see them on feet, as it might make a big difference seeing them being rocked.
