- 8,700
- 7,401
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2012
Artificial measures? You mean like trickle down economics and essentially our current tax code? Can I see these economist''s after economist's staking these claims?Exactly. Economist after economist has admitted that this economy is in bad shape and the growth is anemic. Without the artificial measures the Fed has taken to prop the economy up, things would be a real disaster.
Listen, I am about as independent as they come, I'm not even "liberal" on a lot of social issues, and I am certainly liberal on some financial ones. I can't stand Hillary, never could, she seems as fake as can be, a neocon and she is unwilling to admit mistakes she's made. All recipe's for disaster.
But I can not be a hypocrite and support a candidate who took initial positions I loved: Not bending over for Israel, calling out wall street, gun control, and even his opponent, and since flipped on all of these issues. (Trump)
The biggest issue of all for me, is the refusal of congress to act on the Supreme Court Nominee, will be voting for the boys in blue.
http://www.people-press.org/2016/02/22/majority-of-public-wants-senate-to-act-on-obamas-court-nominee/By more than four to one (77% to 18%), those with postgraduate degrees say the Senate should hold hearings and vote on Obama’s nominee, rather than delaying action until the next president fills the court vacancy. Majorities of those with college degrees (60%) and some college experience (55%) also favor the Senate acting on Obama’s choice for the high court.
Last edited: