Donald Trump is running for president

[RustyShackleford]

Look at what is happening in Paris right now. How in the hell people don't want to secure our borders is beyond me.

Building a wall isn't that expensive. The cost of illegals in our country now is $200-$300 billion per year. It will be a net positive.

-Mexican terrorist are not the ones committing attacks in Paris. The attack isn't even over and you already started with the fear mongering

-I want a source for that figure, because I don't believe it just because you say it. This has been fact check too BTW. LINK

-How much do you think a wall is going to cost BTW? And how much for monitor the entire border? It will cost billions upon billions upon billions over time. It won't be a net positive, not economically nor financially.

-And Mexican immigrants provide tons of cheap labor to American businesses, so get ready for the price of food and construction to jump and economic growth to slow down as a result.

But don't deflect, I want the source for you figure first of all.

 

[blco02]

Terrorists from Isis and other groups have talked about crossing the border into the us from Mexico. I saw a report about it on CNN. They reported the $200-$300 billion figure in the same report. The terrorists know the border is porous. They aren't dumb.

We are already monitoring the entire border. But the wall would help substantially.

 

[PatRiley]

Israel constructed a wall and its working great. And ever heard of the Great Wall of china? It worked.

The White House has a wall that works.

Jajaja Israel is 475x smaller in land mass than the US.

This guy wants to build a wall and give away money. I wish you were my uncle.

 

[mister friendly]

Laws change though.

We had laws that said women couldn't vote, minorities couldn't vote.

Would you have supported those laws against women and minorities because the law said it was ok?

So you want totally open borders huh. Smart.

Nah I wasn't saying that at all.

I'm saying would you have supported Jim Crow Laws and anti women suffrage laws because they were the law of the land?

 

[blco02]

Jajaja Israel is 475x smaller in land mass than the US.

This guy wants to build a wall and give away money. I wish you were my uncle.

Great Wall of china-5,500 miles

Southern us border -1,900 miles

And experts have said We won't even have to cover all of the 1,900 miles to create a seal on the border.

 

[blco02]

Nah I wasn't saying that at all.

I'm saying would you have supported Jim Crow Laws and anti women suffrage laws because they were the law of the land?

No. Classic liberal deflection from the real issue.

 

[mister friendly]

Guys am I liberal?!?

 

[RustyShackleford]

Terrorists from Isis and other groups have talked about crossing the border into the us from Mexico. I saw a report about it on CNN. They reported the $200-$300 billion figure in the same report. The terrorists know the border is porous. They aren't dumb.

We are already monitoring the entire border. But the wall would help substantially.

So you're don't have any sources of this figure, AT ALL

We just have to take your word for it that your saw it on TV one time.

View media item 1767842
-BTW, How much will the wall cost btw?

 

[RustyShackleford]

Guys am I liberal?!?

Nope, not from what I have seen

-But Blco believes 99% of NT are liberal sheep, take no offense

 

[blco02]

So you're don't have any sources of this figure, AT ALL

We just have to take your word for it that your saw it on TV one time.

View media item 1767842
-BTW, How much will the wall cost btw?

Yea, you can trust me. I don't lie.

Bloomberg reported the cost at $3.5 billion. A drop in the bucket of our annual budget and almost $20 trillion debt. And again, it would save money bc the cost of keeping illegals here is so high.

 

[Master Zik]

Guys am I liberal?!?

Dude deals heavily in labels.

If you disagree with him you're a liberal and he uses the word in a negative way apparently. It's pretty mindless like the words don't have meanings

 

[sea manup]

the great wall of america? 

 

[blco02]

Dude deals heavily in labels.

If you disagree with him you're a liberal and he uses the word in a negative way apparently. It's pretty mindless like the words don't have meanings

No I don't. I have never personally attacked anyone on here who disagrees with me. I used to ignore all the name calling and personal attacks on me but for the past day or so I've been responding to it. Treat me with respect and I'll do the same to you.

 

[RustyShackleford]

So you're don't have any sources of this figure, AT ALL

We just have to take your word for it that your saw it on TV one time.

View media item 1767842
-BTW, How much will the wall cost btw?

Yea, you can trust me. I don't lie.

Bloomberg reported the cost at $3.5 billion. A drop in the bucket of our annual budget and almost $20 trillion debt. And again, it would save money bc the cost of keeping illegals here is so high.

Yes you do. Even worst, you post bias articles and select info out of them, most of the time ignoring information and contradicts the point you're trying to make

So once again

Link the Bloomberg article putting the cost at 3.5 billion.

Provide a source saying that the cost of keeping undocumented immigrants is so high

------

Another thing, our infrastructure is crumbling and instead of putting the money towards that.

Something that will create jobs, that will grow the economy, that will have long term benefits, you want America to indulge in one of the biggest acts of xenophobia in recent history.

Can you can't understand why folk think a all is stupid, even ones that don't like illegal immigrants

Jeez

 

[Master Zik]

Dude deals heavily in labels.

If you disagree with him you're a liberal and he uses the word in a negative way apparently. It's pretty mindless like the words don't have meanings

No I don't.

Yes you do. You just did it


You call ppl liberal and left wing among other things all the time without even asking what side they identify with or if they even do align with any political party. To you the person disagrees with you so they must be a liberal. *YAWN*

I have never personally attacked anyone on here who disagrees with me.

There you go making stuff up nobody said instead of reading, comprehending and giving a response that has some thought.

 

[blco02]

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...ave-as-much-leverage-with-mexico-as-he-thinks

http://www.fairus.org/publications/...llegal-immigration-on-united-states-taxpayers


I'm giving you quite the education tonight.

 

[RustyShackleford]

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...ave-as-much-leverage-with-mexico-as-he-thinks

http://www.fairus.org/publications/...llegal-immigration-on-united-states-taxpayers


I'm giving you quite the education tonight.

View media item 1768484
From the Bloomberg article. The 3.5 billion dollar figure is the one Trump provided, not controlling for inflation, on Fox News

On Fox, Trump estimated that completing a wall along the southern border would require enclosing about 1,000 miles along the border. Using the previous costs as a benchmark, and without adjusting for inflation, that would put the total price tag for completion at $3.58 billion.

THE VERY NEXT PARAGRAPH STATES

And that's just the wall. A Bloomberg Government analysis in 2013 estimated what it would cost to completely seal the border: $28 billion per year.

And look at when the New York Times ran that numbers

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/20/us/politics/border-fence-raises-cost-questions.html?_r=0

We in the hundreds of billions for just a decade.

Famb you belong in the fools thinking they doing it thread

 

[blco02]

View media item 1768484
From the Bloomberg article. The 3.5 billion dollar figure is the one Trump provided, not controlling for inflation, on Fox News
THE VERY NEXT PARAGRAPH STATES
And look at when the New York Times ran that numbers

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/20/us/politics/border-fence-raises-cost-questions.html?_r=0

We in the hundreds of billions for just a decade. Famb you belong in the fools thinking they doing it thread

Can you add and subtract properly?

Even if I believe the biased(your favorite word) New York Times, the cost of the wall will be $28 billion. The cost of illegals using the other link I provided is $113 billion per year. And that was a 2013 figure, it's higher now.

113 is greater than 28. 113-28=85. That means we would SAVE $85 billion per year. And I won't even charge you for the arithmetic lesson.

 

[RustyShackleford]

View media item 1768484
From the Bloomberg article. The 3.5 billion dollar figure is the one Trump provided, not controlling for inflation, on Fox News
THE VERY NEXT PARAGRAPH STATES
And look at when the New York Times ran that numbers

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/20/us/politics/border-fence-raises-cost-questions.html?_r=0

We in the hundreds of billions for just a decade. Famb you belong in the fools thinking they doing it thread

Can you add and subtract properly?

Even if I believe the biased(your favorite word) New York Times, the cost of the wall will be $28 billion. The cost of illegals using the other link I provided is $113 billion per year. And that was a 2013 figure, it's higher now.

113 is greater than 28. 113-28=85. That means we would SAVE $85 billion per year. And I won't even charge you for the arithmetic lesson.

Umm papi can you read and comprehend.

The largest cost of undocumented children to government are educating their kids your reports says. BUT THEY INCLUDED ONES BORN IN AMERICA IN THE TOTAL

So they are using American citizens too. 3.4 million legal kids, versus 1.4 undocumented children

If we deport all those undocumented parents, the kids still have the right to stay. And the state will still have to provide form them even more

And they put ALL compensated medical cost on the back of these immigrants. So if a poor white American skipped out on their medical bill, it is added to the total

This paper is literally just blaming undocumented immigrants for everything they think they contribute toward.

-And the New York Times is one of the most well respected newspapers in the world. You post the Washington Times, you the hell are you to talk

 

[RustyShackleford]

And you want to all out the New York times for being bias. When the site your source has this video on its front page



Like these dude don't haven't picked sides already. C'mon B

 

[blco02]

Anyone with a brain and that follows news/politics knows the New York Times is heavily liberal. If you don't know that or wont admit it then you need to do research.

But whatever. Why don't you take in a few illegals into your home. Clothe and feed them and give them free healthcare while you're at it. Liberals love to be generous with other people's money.

 

[RustyShackleford]

Anyone with a brain and that follows news/politics knows the New York Times is heavily liberal. If you don't know that or wont admit it then you need to do research.

But whatever. Why don't you take in a few illegals into your home. Clothe and feed them and give them free healthcare while you're at it. Liberals love to be generous with other people's money.

So I call you both your sources for being BS, and this is your best comeback

Some middle school steez

The New York Times is a left leading paper, and is consider one of the best papers worldwide

Same way the Economist is right lending and highly regarded

But the both still reputable papers, unlike the Washington Times or New York Post

Your problem is that your even think a liberal is talking, you completely disregard what they are saying.

-------But anyway, you'll never convince me to believe the right wing steez you believe and you'll never see the world the way I see it, or even consider my view points.

I'm done famb, do you, keep cooking in your right wing wonderland

 

[mr marcus]

Bloc did you vote for McCrory?

 

[alchemist iq]

I’ve been inside the New York time building. I didn’t like. The Vibe i got in there are overly educated people with their nose up the *****.

 

[RustyShackleford]

Bloc did you vote for McCrory?

Damb I forgot, Blco your mans, y'all both repping NC