- 38,856
- 54,755
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2014
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Saw that earlier, they need to be freed
As a gun enthusiast, you're ok with shooting people you don't like in the back?But but but ... that aweful mom, that legally owned a gun and showed her son how to safely use it is bad .... she escalate the situation! She did such a bad job raising her son that when she tried to take the gun from him to shoot the witness the son prevented her from doing so.
Welp!
Another criminal and murderer are free.
I'm against violence.As a gun enthusiast, you're ok with shooting people you don't like in the back?
Seems like real gun nuts would be against that
You're against violence, but you're ok with kids shooting people who (according to reports) were retreating. Ok, buddy.I'm against violence.
However, in this case the aggressor got what he deserved.
I can understand why there are no charges. When I say heat of the moment I meant it. If a person willingly goes out with the intentions to shoot, that's murderer. You have to prove that he went with those intentions, if not, then you have to prove that he was conscious and understood the threat was over ... for all we know he was driving by fear and was not in the right state of mind to understand that guy was fleeing. For all we know dude could of have thought he was running outside and was coming back to finish what was started.
You omitting everything and just pin pointing to shooting is the back is plain ignorance on your part.
To be honest, crime is running rampit and thats because the law and people want to punish the innocent rather than the guilty.
You sounding like a George Zimmerman supporter low keypeople want to punish the innocent rather than the guilty.