Do you even know what the terms of the deal were?
Yes, they were to get 97% of the land, but do you understand the rest of the terms? Just in case you don't, I'll explain.
First off, by the end of the talks, Israel was going to keep about 6% of the West Bank. This included their larger settlements, and the newly constructed highways that led into them. To make up for this, Israel was going to give the Palestinians a part of Israel that was desert, and equated to about 3%. Now, what would the new Palestine look like?
It would have been three small territories that would have been completely seperated from one another, whether it be by Israeli fortifications, roads patrolled by the Israeli army, or fences that had, guess what? Checkpoints. This means that even if it were created, a citizen of the new Palestinian state could not maneuver around his homeland, from say, Nablus to Gaza City, without the permission of the Israelis.
Also, Israel wanted to keep 5 military bases in the Jordan Valley. They wanted to control the airspace above, the water below, and the coast that would have bordered the new nation.
To quote Richard Ben Cramer, "the Israelis proposed to continue their occupation, with a prettier name- Palestine."
There. You're obviously extremely closed minded and refuse to look at the situation from the other side.
No, it wasn't answered. What that chick posted said "everybody is entitled to FREEDOM", where do you associate FREEDOM = STATE? It isn't the same thing. Freedom is a Human Right a State is not.
Again, this was answered by more than one person. If you can't even make an attempt to see things from the other side then there really is nopoint in talking to you. Everything you have said in this thread has been completely one sided.