- 5,527
- 14
This is why we should've picked up a PG in the draft.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think we would have loved to but by the time we were up Rubio, Evans, Flynn, and even Curry were off board. Who would you wanna get JenningsOriginally Posted by abeautifulhaze
This is why we should've picked up a PG in the draft.
i feel you. But in honestly lets take a look at a team like Houston who has been rumored to be interested in Curry. They just signed Ariza multiyear and with Battier and Yao still taking up cap space there is no possible way they can hand out a max contract next summer. However by 2011 almost all oftheir salary is off the books and their only major contract is Ariza.Originally Posted by BangDak
BJ has done pretty well in the SL games.
i mean, 2011 FA class isnt bad, but honestly, who doesnt want to have a cap space and try to give lebron a good offer?
but i mean, if we can pull a denver and trade curry for a 2nd round pick like they did for marcus camby, im all for it.
brooks is overrated. hes quick and all, but eh.Originally Posted by THE GR8
i feel you. But in honestly lets take a look at a team like Houston who has been rumored to be interested in Curry. They just signed Ariza multi year and with Battier and Yao still taking up cap space there is no possible way they can hand out a max contract next summer. However by 2011 almost all of their salary is off the books and their only major contract is Ariza.Originally Posted by BangDak
BJ has done pretty well in the SL games.
i mean, 2011 FA class isnt bad, but honestly, who doesnt want to have a cap space and try to give lebron a good offer?
but i mean, if we can pull a denver and trade curry for a 2nd round pick like they did for marcus camby, im all for it.
Houston is also a team that may not ant to give up just yet considering how far they went last year. They replaced Artest with Ariza and must still have some hope that T Mac can be a factor next season and Brooks broke out HARD in the playoffs last season. The only problem is losing Yao. They may be a team that will take a chance on Curry because if Curry can be any kind of a force next season he will put them back in the picture. however if he fails 2010 means nothing to them anyway and they can clean house and start back up in 2011.
[h2]Which Long Term Deal Should New York Make?[/h2]
Just curious what Knick fans think, since it seems that things have quieted down. Let's assume that we only have one long term deal to offer this summer. Which one you would prefer? This doesn't mean that New York can't sign the other players to 1 year deals (save for Sessions), but it does mean they would hit the market as an unrestricted free agent next year. While that doesn't mean the Knicks couldn't resign that player next summer, however it comes with some caveats.
First is that they would likely have to get a deal done quickly, because the cap hold would likely be larger than their contract. Secondly if they decide they can't afford the player, they would have to renounce their rights to get the cap hold released. And finally, as an unrestricted free agent that player wouldn't have to give the Knicks a chance to match an offer. They could just leave the team without any compensation.
So if you could only pick one offer, which would it be? I tried to approximate their 2011 salary, so you'd get an idea of how much it would cost the Knicks next summer. And remember the offer to Sessions would mean that the Bucks could match.
Which Long Term Deal Should New York Make?
- A David Lee - 5 years/$45M ($8.1M in 2011)
- B Nate Robinson - 5 years/$25M ($4.5M in 2011)
- C Ramon Sessions offer sheet - 5 years/$33.9M ($6.1M in 2011)
- D None
Originally Posted by BangDak
^its called being smart with money, not wasting it the second you get it, for example portland and zeke.
and those are all big numbers they're going to get. donnie wouldnt give out any of those deals.
Originally Posted by abeautifulhaze
This is why we should've picked up a PG in the draft.
Originally Posted by you big dummy
Bad news for NYK fans:
the Knicks let Toney Douglass wear #23...
For some damn reason I regret passing on him and I didn't even like him as a player coming into the draft. Just something about him seems likehe should be in New York, I'm not even talking about the Knicks, just the whole city of New York in generalOriginally Posted by The Game is a Foot
Originally Posted by you big dummy
That hurt...
A LOT.