Originally Posted by
slickp42189
Originally Posted by
bauercans
Originally Posted by sillyputty
Read page 3 and try again.
Sillyputty Truth^ Did you know the book of Genesis has about six different writers? You can distinguish them by their imagery and writing style.
Let's not forget about the Book of Enoch as well.
The suffix of the names 'el' means 'God' (List of names referring to El) which is used in the names of high ranking angels. The Archangels all include this such as Uriel (Flame of God) or Michael "who is like God?". Another is given as Gadrel, who is said to have tempted Eve; Schmidt lists the name as meaning "the helper of God."
Amazing how Christianity loves images of Christ while accepting the Old Testament probably from the widespread acceptance-or too lazy to rewrite perhaps? Did you know that the Jews and Muslims reject images of God because it would be blasphemous and contemptuous to even attempt it? With "mini Christs" on the pulpit and in the Vatican. Once again, Christianity loves PR. Hey lets steal that Gilgamesh boat story for the Old Testament. Oh and that Gilgamesh everlasting life idea, let's steal that to for our grand finale. OG biters.
The use of John Milton's moniker was brilliant to portray an authentic Satan and not the caricature one from Paradise Lost.
yea i know that, how is it that i cant possibly know anything because im Christian? like im supposed to be like OMG im having an epiphany, im not Christian anymore
you guys are honestly not telling me anything new, i was required to study this in hs for four years and
im still deciding to stick with my guns, because it works for me
Doing things because they're comfortable doesn't make them any more true, valid, or real.
But hey, if you admit to lying to yourself, go ahead.
I presented evidence that challenges in every way each claim you made. But I can't spell it out for you. Its up to you to decide how long you want to keep the charade up.
Intellectual dishonesty and incongruence is apart of the gift bag of being religious it seems.
You should be proud to wear that cognitive dissonance like a medal, just don't be surprised if someone tells you that its not gold, but rather a wood pendant painted yellow.
Maybe if people spent more time learning about the history of things they claim to identify with, we wouldn't be having these sorts of "back and forths." Its a shame that I have to know more about this, than you...and I'm not even the one that believes this, thats
YOUR job. You'd think someone who wants to be religious would be able to rectify the glaring inconsistencies in logic, if it was true, but they can't even do that...and they REFUSE to. Its also alarming that religious logic is the only area in their daily lives that they neglect to apply the same standard of criticism and objectivity. Moving the goalposts as we call it...
But like I said, its a free country, and I will support your right to believe whatever you want to believe...I will
NOT, however, respect what you believe. There is a difference.
There is no though, idea, concept, or conclusion that is free from criticism or inquiry. No matter how personal or important you think it is.