- 8,485
- 1,318
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2010
Rappers are individuals. Record labels are corporations. Corporations =/= people.Huh? I don't have a problem with the rappers. They're just individuals trying to make a living. Anyone has a right to make whatever music they want.Why do y'all blame the suits instead of the rappers, especially when the most popular "drug" rappers aren't even signed, rarely release albums and live off of mixtapes (Gucci) or weren't signed when they reached their current status of fame (Flocka, Gucci, Scooter, Keef, Future)?
The problem is that the media only chooses to push a certain type of music, and as a result the public isn't adequately exposed to what is out there besides those 'trap' rappers. There are just as many people making the music J Cole, Kendrick, etc does, as those who make the music Gucci, Future, etc does. But one of those groups is clearly more represented in MSM.
So wait . . . it's okay for the rappers to get money any means necessary and do what's profitable but it's wrong for the record labels to do the same? Just like the labels could potentially have knowledge of what the music could do to the youth, do you think the rappers are unaware of that? Especially coming from the place they come from?
Somewhat Irrelevant Sidenote: Cole and Kendrick's success comes from their song making abilities, I can tell you right now IMO the reason why most cats with good lyrics are forever gonna be failures, is because they stay choosing dusty *** corny beats . . . K Dot and Cole know how to rap quality stuff, but still have you nod your head to it, or have it sound dope in your car . . . thus why their music is popular with the masses because even with a song like Swimming Pools or even most of the S80 cuts that have a deeper meaning, K Dot knows how to pick a beat and write a chorus and for the average listener it's catchy and sounds good and will do good on the charts, but for the person who looks for lyrics, you appreciate it. That's what separates them from the average lyrical cat, just my opinion
To go back to my food analogy again, that's like saying that since some parents choose to disregard their children's health and feed them low quality food, it's okay for major food distributors to be selling cheap low-quality food. Individuals are free to do whatever they want to do. But once you are a publicly-owned corporation, there is an ethical protocol that comes with that.
We can't demand perfection out of every single person. But when it comes to corporations that have concentrated influence over many people at once, we have to demand transparency and ethical practices. That's kind of been a big issue since 2008, if you haven't noticed.
Rappers like 2 Chainz and Future can always market their music locally in Atlanta, on Youtube, etc the same way non 'mainstream' rappers do. They don't HAVE to be pushed in the media as much as they are, over other rappers who make different types of music.
Last edited: