- 503
- 28
still call them the gloryholes
Hope JB Learned his lesson
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by jumpman23legendary,
- Start date
- 1,642
- 73
Yeah the 2010 sucked as far as looks... I cant possibly see myself rockin these while im dressed to impress... id ball in these though, tried em on and comfy... someone have to be throwin em out the window first though before i drop cash on em lol
- 1,053
- 11
the pic of the Black/UNC colorway looks dope
jumpmanfromdabay
Banned
- 25,730
- 2,900
If the 2010s wasnt 180 they would have sold better.
- 967
- 12
you have to be kidding....I mean really? I personally dont like the 2010s and never plan on buying any but to make that statement you are on crack. How can you say these 2010s are better than the XX3? Come on now.
- 812
- 10
sorry fam, but they are basketball shoes. Last time i checked the newer models from JB are made for performance, not
for you to go to the clubs and "impress".
- 9,606
- 13,357
^^^ thank you... to ACTUAL athletes , its abt performance.. i buy the lightest best cleats (not determined by looks) for performance on the field.. just like a basketball player would do with their "cleats".. alot of you dudes hype s%$t up for looks, do you even know how to play ball?? do u step away from your comp ?? ccmon Son....
- 5,407
- 3,444
????
comments like this are what I don't understand. Say this in a Team shoe thread, not for the 2010. If you don't think quality is there, you haven't held a pair. If you don't think originality is there...there is a damn window in the side of the shoe
Mactastic4167
formerly mac4167
- 5,909
- 1,022
I love my UNC pair, very comfy and look good as long as your wearing some black socks.
- 10,321
- 8,214
i like this pair myself JB can really never go wrong with this color combo
- 1,803
- 11
Pics on first page don't work for me beside the UNC colorway which is pretty
in my opinion. Looks like a real nice shoe to ball in.
- 28,747
- 11,954
The XIX is worse than the XV? or worse than the XX? idk about that. but the 2010's are pretty ugly except in the UNC colorway which for some reason really is appealing to me
- 85
- 10
as long as its a jordan shoe it will sell regardless lol
- 3,684
- 66
- 380
- 10
IMO the 2010 is the only Jordan worth buying this year. I would rather buy a shoe with good quality than a classic shoe with cheap materials.
- 69
- 10
The 2009's are 100 times worse than the 2010's.
- 1,288
- 65
2010? seriously...i have not seen anyone wear the 2009.
- 73
- 10
HAHA!!
- 21,633
- 10,252
QFT
They obviously didn't "Learn their lesson" because if they did the 2010 would have been a rebound shoe because the 2009's were prob the worst Jordan ever created. The 2010 is way better then the 2009. But still when Nike releases such good quality CHEAP basketball shoes Jordan is playing second fiddle.
Why buy the 2010 when the Kobe is lighter, more comfortable, performs better, comes in better color's, can be IDed, and is cheaper?
- 2,974
- 10
I wouldn't even ball in some 2010s. Straight ugly. Another sneaker I won't ever see anyone rocking around my way. Hell I don't even see kobes around my way. Those are ugly too. Performance wise they might be nice, but so is a lot of other sneakers. That's just my opinion.
- 34,648
- 28,007
These shoes are horrible imo. It's like after the xx3's all of the good designers were like, 'yo, i'm out'.
- 1,867
- 11
I can think of a lot of shoes that are worse than the 2010.
- 583
- 227
If MJ had played in these back in the day, they would be much more accepted.
- 352
- 10
Haha
I wouldnt Pay $170 for them
I wouldnt Pay $170 for them
- 5,040
- 1,412
