How should a man's body count correspond to that of a woman's?

I just dont see the appeal of a virgin or thinking you're the man because you found yourself a virgin.

Maybe because im getting older but I cant see myself having conversations with my boys like "oh you're dating a new girl? how many dudes has she slept with before you?" I've never seen this obsession outside of NT
 
I just dont see the appeal of a virgin or thinking you're the man because you found yourself a virgin.

Maybe because im getting older but I cant see myself having conversations with my boys like "oh you're dating a new girl? how many dudes has she slept with before you?" I've never seen this obsession outside of NT
Not saying that I disagree with you, but #s have always been a topic of discussion.
 
depends....

If its a one night stand.. you want a chick who has experience

Relationship, you want some vnds box...
 
Last edited:
Wifey had 2(bodies) b4 me and she was celibate over a year b4 we got together... spoke for 6 months b4 we made it offical..

Box was A+, and i didnt have to worry about virgin problems...

Plus the other 2 dudes werent in the "average" category which made it better... below average ftl... lol
 
Just cause a chick been with 3 dudes or so doesn't mean that box hasn't got milage put on it.

This is very true! Which is why this subject is very complex.

Here, let's put this into perspective shall we?

if I was my girls first body and we broke up.... Then the next man just shopped at Jose's dealer and bought himself 1990 BMW E32 with 700,000+ miles.... On its 3rd motor!
 
Are talking mileage as in like physical wear and tear of the box? Or is the mental idea of a girl being with X amount of guys?
 
Are talking mileage as in like physical wear and tear of the box? Or is the mental idea of a girl being with X amount of guys?

Good question.

Whats worse NT, a girl thats been smashed by the same guy 1000+ times or a girls that been with 20 guys once?
 
The 1000X box probably looks way worst

Maybe but the chick whos been passed around has major mental issues...you can't wife that
And there's a slim chance that a chick who's had 20+ has low mileage...
 
Last edited:
Maybe but the chick whos been passed around has major mental issues...you can't wife that
And there's a slim chance that a chick who's had 20+ has low mileage...

Still want to know what we're talking about when we say mileage. Is this actual wear and tear or is it a mental thing that comes with sleeping with X amount of guys. If Wear and tear is the issue would y'all say your wife's box is trash after having your first kid? Cause that will definitely do more damage than any 5,10, or 20 guys can do.
 
My body count doesn't have anything to do worth a chicks count ...I don't ask about theirs , only thing I wanna know is if she smashed any of my homeboys, taken multiple d's at one time or been in a porn or something ...n if they ask me I always give em a generic 10-20 answer :lol
 
My body count doesn't have anything to do worth a chicks count ...I don't ask about theirs , only thing I wanna know is if she smashed any of my homeboys, taken multiple d's at one time or been in a porn or something ...n if they ask me I always give em a generic 10-20 answer
laugh.gif
nothing wrong with taking multiple ds at one time or being in porn.  homeboys is a deal breaker though
 
ehh i've had virgins. not really interested in them. I want a female with enough experience to entertain me, while still having enough traction on the box to stimulate me.
Yea if I'm just smashing I need a chick that knows what she doing ...last virgin I had was wack n a headache :{
 
My body count doesn't have anything to do worth a chicks count ...I don't ask about theirs , only thing I wanna know is if she smashed any of my homeboys, taken multiple d's at one time or been in a porn or something ...n if they ask me I always give em a generic 10-20 answer :lol

This pretty much where I'm at with it. I don't talk numbers. And yall can have those virginis. Let another n mold her. I'm 28 tho so it's a lil different for me than yall younger ones.
 
Its innate in us to desire females who havent been "had" by a large number of men.

Its all in ancient texts that it's only noble to marry virgins and all that.

The word bastard or son of b**** comes from the fact your mother was so promiscuous that we're not sure who your father is.

Nowadays of course we have contraception and DNA tests so society is adopting to accepting a more liberal way of approaching sex but a lot of that mindset is still in us sort to say.

But to answer your question i still think its more natural for a dude to have more partners than a chick simply because biologically men are made to spread seed.

Each time you bust a nut you have the potential of a billion lives. That's almost 3 USA's fam in a rubber...or a tissue....

A woman literally has to sit for 9 months after you impregnate her so her potential of life making is finite.

Dudes was created to get these numbers in fam
while this makes SOME sense.....

isn't this all under the assumption that "our creator" intended us to go around trying to populate the earth any chance we got lol...?

it seems to contradict the good book encouraging sex with only your spouse

would it also make sense that the potential of a billion lives, if accurate, is because the success rate is so low?..... sending out 10 soldiers just ain't going to get the job done

your explanation is merging casual sex and sex for creation all in one --- that's a manipulation of the topic I think ... especially because this question is really based on casual sex

y'all doing your best NOT to get girls pregnant lol
 
while this makes SOME sense.....

isn't this all under the assumption that "our creator" intended us to go around trying to populate the earth any chance we got lol...?

it seems to contradict the good book encouraging sex with only your spouse

would it also make sense that the potential of a billion lives, if accurate, is because the success rate is so low?..... sending out 10 soldiers just ain't going to get the job done

your explanation is merging casual sex and sex for creation all in one --- that's a manipulation of the topic I think ... especially because this question is really based on casual sex

y'all doing your best NOT to get girls pregnant lol
It is manipulation, but it's no surprise people only mention certain aspects to prove their weird theories :lol
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom