- 1,479
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2008
IMO, they could have easily won it 9 straight years.. if they only pay Pip and convince MJ to play one more season for the Bulls,the '99 (lockout?)season..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Man, you can't sit here & make this argument.Originally Posted by Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
all im going to say is this. anyone who thinks the bulls would've won 32 straight playoff series, had their best player give up a chunk of the offseason to play in an olympics and have their second best player give up chunks of 2 offseasons in that same stretch is delusional and doesn't know much about basketball. this isn't the 1960's boston celtics where they only had to play 2 playoff rounds every year
again people disregard that the bulls were challenged the most during the last year of each 3 peat. teams were catching up to them in 93 and in 98. next who knows what changes are made if mike doesn't retire. aside from phil, mike, and scottie the 91-93 teams and 96-98 teams were completely different but still at the end of the day teams were catching up to the bulls at the end of each 3 peat.
people dismiss the 93-94 and 94-95 rockets like they were chumps which is rediculous. they repeated for a reason and won some very tough series during that stretch.
i don't wanna take to much from regular season games but the 91-93 bulls went 1-5 against the rockets when they played and jordan even said that they would be in trouble if they were to play houston in the finals. bottom line is houston matched up with them good and would've gave the bulls fits.
Man, you can't sit here & make this argument.Originally Posted by Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
all im going to say is this. anyone who thinks the bulls would've won 32 straight playoff series, had their best player give up a chunk of the offseason to play in an olympics and have their second best player give up chunks of 2 offseasons in that same stretch is delusional and doesn't know much about basketball. this isn't the 1960's boston celtics where they only had to play 2 playoff rounds every year
again people disregard that the bulls were challenged the most during the last year of each 3 peat. teams were catching up to them in 93 and in 98. next who knows what changes are made if mike doesn't retire. aside from phil, mike, and scottie the 91-93 teams and 96-98 teams were completely different but still at the end of the day teams were catching up to the bulls at the end of each 3 peat.
people dismiss the 93-94 and 94-95 rockets like they were chumps which is rediculous. they repeated for a reason and won some very tough series during that stretch.
i don't wanna take to much from regular season games but the 91-93 bulls went 1-5 against the rockets when they played and jordan even said that they would be in trouble if they were to play houston in the finals. bottom line is houston matched up with them good and would've gave the bulls fits.
Originally Posted by bittersweet
Why would you make this thread?
I believe the Bulls could have won 9 straight titles.
I include '99 because it was the lockout year, 50 game season for the defending champs?
They could have did it if the Bulls org. didn't make everything fall apart.
Originally Posted by bittersweet
Why would you make this thread?
I believe the Bulls could have won 9 straight titles.
I include '99 because it was the lockout year, 50 game season for the defending champs?
They could have did it if the Bulls org. didn't make everything fall apart.
My pops talks about that team quite often and I agree with you that no team will ever match that feat again.Originally Posted by westcoastsfinest
if im not mistaken the last time a team 8peated were bill russell's celtics. isnt this the longest streak of championships in history? that whole team basically consisted of hall of famers. i dont think this feat will ever be matched or broken.
My pops talks about that team quite often and I agree with you that no team will ever match that feat again.Originally Posted by westcoastsfinest
if im not mistaken the last time a team 8peated were bill russell's celtics. isnt this the longest streak of championships in history? that whole team basically consisted of hall of famers. i dont think this feat will ever be matched or broken.
Because now you have to play more then 1-2 series a season. That team wouldn't win 32 straight either.Originally Posted by Down By Law
My pops talks about that team quite often and I agree with you that no team will ever match that feat again.Originally Posted by westcoastsfinest
if im not mistaken the last time a team 8peated were bill russell's celtics. isnt this the longest streak of championships in history? that whole team basically consisted of hall of famers. i dont think this feat will ever be matched or broken.