- 9,839
- 10,815
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2005
But you're missing my point.
Either way you still pay taxes, which fund the beliefs/policies of said corrupt government and as long as they get their money nobody gives a damn whether you vote or not.
If your smart you won't vote for either candidate in this presidential election.
But you're missing my point.
Either way you still pay taxes, which fund the beliefs/policies of said corrupt government and as long as they get their money nobody gives a damn whether you vote or not.
- 157,132
- 137,000
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2001
Ok, I have a question. Serious question.
If "they" wanted to lie about the results they very well could right? I mean how would any of us know who really won the election?
If "they" wanted to lie about the results they very well could right? I mean how would any of us know who really won the election?
iblink
Banned
- 6,497
- 468
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
Simply put. We wouldn't.
- 12,503
- 925
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
Who is "they" b? The tens of thousands of people around the country that actually have to count the ballots?
The thousands of pundits measuring the voting turnout, the pollsters?
Why have a week long recount in Florida if "they" could just lie about the results?
- 12,503
- 925
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
It would be so much easier to just make this country a autocracy or a monarch then to go through the work of having a public system of millions of people to lie to the country.
But nah Im thinking to rationally. Saying "they" did it is easier requires less thinking.
But nah Im thinking to rationally. Saying "they" did it is easier requires less thinking.
shoelyesses
Banned
- 5,770
- 1,292
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2012
its pretty much a damn if u do damn if u dont situation.
shoelyesses
Banned
- 5,770
- 1,292
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2012
they could/ and possibly do all these things and still lie... the funny thing is ppl say its to hard to pull off, or they couldnt, or it would be to obvious. but i will say this... the best way to hide something is in plain sight.
- 30,660
- 10,412
- Joined
- May 22, 2009
OP it's "you're"
- 1,216
- 386
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2008
OP your thread title is pretty gaudy and off-putting.
Should be:
'If you're smart, either you know exactly why it is that you are voting or you know exactly why it is that you are not voting'
But you're saying WE ALL (every single one of us) need to forego our option to vote in order for the mass shift to succeed?
View media item 125676
Should be:
'If you're smart, either you know exactly why it is that you are voting or you know exactly why it is that you are not voting'
But you're saying WE ALL (every single one of us) need to forego our option to vote in order for the mass shift to succeed?
View media item 125676
- 7,052
- 1,137
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2005
I'm voting for myself or Jill Stein
- 3,545
- 434
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2004
if nobody voted, we would be handing 100% of the power to the same gov't that you think is corrupt. do you actually believe what you're writing?
btw, "if your smart"
wait. hol' up. is this pig love in the skies?
They already have the power. Look it up. Gore won Florida and therefore the presidency, but no one stood up to make sure the right person ended up in the white house. And black folks don't give a damn since "we might not have Barack." Yeah, I said it. And even if you do vote, you're only voting for concepts not the actual execution of a plan. Either way, it sickens me how complacent people are about Gore winning Florida. How can people who voted for Gore have the audacity to look at anyone and say "your vote counts"? That's nothing short of ******ed.
Last edited:
- 1,519
- 152
- Joined
- May 2, 2007
If you don't like the American government and what future government will look like then why not go live elsewhere? Try Egypt, since you used it as an example.
I swear.
I swear.
- 10,459
- 8,935
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2011
It's a voting census. Drives the talking points and statistics we here day in and out during election coverage in media. It's more like a survey than a vote.
- 10,459
- 8,935
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2011
great post and repped
What could potentially happen if people en masse stopped voting?
Last edited:
- 8,616
- 1,461
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2005
I wasnt planning on voting for either of these dudes. Am I smart?
- 157,132
- 137,000
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2001
Gotta love this programmed response.
iblink
Banned
- 6,497
- 468
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
Dudes swear this response is the ultimate answer that will thwart any further debate.
- 4,952
- 114
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2003
Solution: run away from all problems. Don't solve them.
Sounds like a brilliant idea.
- 1,519
- 152
- Joined
- May 2, 2007
/quote]
Programmed? What exactly does that mean? Explain.
Programmed? What exactly does that mean? Explain.
Last edited:
- 1,519
- 152
- Joined
- May 2, 2007
- 10,459
- 8,935
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2011
As soon as somebody say America is messed up, the first response from a dissenter is to say "well why don't you go to the world sworst hell hole then if you don't like it here stateside!!!!"
Last edited:
shoelyesses
Banned
- 5,770
- 1,292
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2012
if that happened usa would only have whites and minorities who are blind to the facts, and are complacent and content with how things are so long as they get a pat on the head, a decent wife/car/house and other monetary valued possesions
- 1,476
- 233
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2000
This post is pointless. Even if no one on NT, or the sneaker community for that matter votes, someone will. There's always electoral votes. Whether you like it or not, one of these two men will be our president for the next two years. If you want to see a corrupt system, try visiting a few 3rd world countries, where there is no middle class (Mexico is nearby and approaching that status), only very rich and very poor. People like you started the "Occupy" movement, another epic fail.
createdestroy
Banned
- 4,310
- 2,017
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2010
not bad imo
Last edited:
- 10,459
- 8,935
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2011
Got too cold to protest....first world problems...