IRAN..... now produced roughly enough nuclear material to make a single nuclear bomb

you morons think the world will be better without Israel. See what happens when Iran has a bomb and starts messing with the whole middle east how it sees fit.

the ultimate goal is money and being as though we want oil and either iran or saudi arabia is gonna give it to us, its just a matter of which one we wantto buy it from.

i fail to see how/why Israel fits into American foreign policy.
 
Originally Posted by repinqueens

you morons think the world will be better without Israel. See what happens when Iran has a bomb and starts messing with the whole middle east how it sees fit.
Despite what you may see on the propoganda....er news, the Israeli's are capable of taking care of themselves. And if they aren't, tough.Big fish eat little fish. Thats just the way the cookie crumbles.
 
Originally Posted by bns1201

well at least our president elect has Ahmadinejad's approval

The Ayatollah is the real president. Ahmadinejad has an approval rating similar to Bush's.
 
Originally Posted by DAYTONA 5000

Originally Posted by repinqueens

you morons think the world will be better without Israel. See what happens when Iran has a bomb and starts messing with the whole middle east how it sees fit.
Despite what you may see on the propoganda....er news, the Israeli's are capable of taking care of themselves. And if they aren't, tough. Big fish eat little fish. Thats just the way the cookie crumbles.


oh word? big fish eat the little fish? So what was wrong with Israel being pushed into a war by enemies surrounding them, WINNING, and taking land (6 day war).It's been done since the dawn of time right? you win, you get the territory, you get to write history...

but no the world has a soft spot for getting at the Jewish people. It's comical that a country the size of NJ with like 8 million people is"bullying" the middle east..

and to whoever doesn't understand where Israel fits into Americas plans... they trade information, tactical strategy, U.S. could have bases there etc. andI'm sure so shady dealings as well. We are allies that's all there is to it. Israel is Americas little democracy in the middle east...

I've been to Israel and the mantra is "America needs Israel" not the other way around...
 
Originally Posted by rickybadman

Israel needs to chill, if they attack Iran it will start a full out war in the Middle East that Israel will not be able to handle by themselves. America, since we for some reason are their "closest ally" in the fight against terrorism, will have to go to war too. A lot of Americans would be pissed off that we would be dragged into another unnecessary war, because another country feels we have to cosign everything they do.
Why should Israel chill???
Have you heard what ahmadinejad has said about Israel???

His comments are OUT OF CONTROL. He's said he wants to pretty much destroy Israel.

If I were Israel I'd seriously be worried.... which they are.... which is why they will probably take military action.
 
Originally Posted by repinqueens

Originally Posted by DAYTONA 5000

Originally Posted by repinqueens

you morons think the world will be better without Israel. See what happens when Iran has a bomb and starts messing with the whole middle east how it sees fit.
Despite what you may see on the propoganda....er news, the Israeli's are capable of taking care of themselves. And if they aren't, tough. Big fish eat little fish. Thats just the way the cookie crumbles.


oh word? big fish eat the little fish? So what was wrong with Israel being pushed into a war by enemies surrounding them, WINNING, and taking land (6 day war). It's been done since the dawn of time right? you win, you get the territory, you get to write history...

but no the world has a soft spot for getting at the Jewish people. It's comical that a country the size of NJ with like 8 million people is "bullying" the middle east..

and to whoever doesn't understand where Israel fits into Americas plans... they trade information, tactical strategy, U.S. could have bases there etc. and I'm sure so shady dealings as well. We are allies that's all there is to it. Israel is Americas little democracy in the middle east...

I've been to Israel and the mantra is "America needs Israel" not the other way around...
u.s funds israel with about 3 billion in military aid yearly
 
I will agree Mossad has assisted the USA a lot (only because Israel needs the USA as a friend)

but this
"America needs Israel"


Is HILARIOUS...

USA only started backing Israel when their plans for influencing the middle east failed. Also, the way the game worked back in the day was: USA picks a sideUSSR picks the opposite, USSR picks a side USA picks the opposite.

I'm not anti-Israel at all, and I never even brought up Israeli crimes against Palestine or w/e people are going on about, but the fact is Israel has itsown set of interests, and it doesn't really give a damn about the USA, they just milk us. Wealthy arab countries would never get involved in a war againstIsrael b/c they have money to be lost as a result of it.
 
Originally Posted by repinqueens

Originally Posted by DAYTONA 5000

Originally Posted by repinqueens

you morons think the world will be better without Israel. See what happens when Iran has a bomb and starts messing with the whole middle east how it sees fit.
Despite what you may see on the propoganda....er news, the Israeli's are capable of taking care of themselves. And if they aren't, tough. Big fish eat little fish. Thats just the way the cookie crumbles.


oh word? big fish eat the little fish? So what was wrong with Israel being pushed into a war by enemies surrounding them, WINNING, and taking land (6 day war). It's been done since the dawn of time right? you win, you get the territory, you get to write history...

but no the world has a soft spot for getting at the Jewish people. It's comical that a country the size of NJ with like 8 million people is "bullying" the middle east..

and to whoever doesn't understand where Israel fits into Americas plans... they trade information, tactical strategy, U.S. could have bases there etc. and I'm sure so shady dealings as well. We are allies that's all there is to it. Israel is Americas little democracy in the middle east...

I've been to Israel and the mantra is "America needs Israel" not the other way around...
I don't even want to share my theory as to why Isreal has the US by the nuts. But keep on believing what's written in your history book
laugh.gif
.
 
Originally Posted by Kal Ripped Ken

Originally Posted by repinqueens

Originally Posted by DAYTONA 5000

Originally Posted by repinqueens

you morons think the world will be better without Israel. See what happens when Iran has a bomb and starts messing with the whole middle east how it sees fit.
Despite what you may see on the propoganda....er news, the Israeli's are capable of taking care of themselves. And if they aren't, tough. Big fish eat little fish. Thats just the way the cookie crumbles.


oh word? big fish eat the little fish? So what was wrong with Israel being pushed into a war by enemies surrounding them, WINNING, and taking land (6 day war). It's been done since the dawn of time right? you win, you get the territory, you get to write history...

but no the world has a soft spot for getting at the Jewish people. It's comical that a country the size of NJ with like 8 million people is "bullying" the middle east..

and to whoever doesn't understand where Israel fits into Americas plans... they trade information, tactical strategy, U.S. could have bases there etc. and I'm sure so shady dealings as well. We are allies that's all there is to it. Israel is Americas little democracy in the middle east...

I've been to Israel and the mantra is "America needs Israel" not the other way around...
u.s funds israel with about 3 billion in military aid yearly
Egypt also gets $2b+ USD. The Saudi's, the Kuwaiti's, and the UAE's all get our money for their oil.
Both sides are played.

Israel doesn't fully trust the US either. That's why they have ever increasing closer relation with Russia and China.
 
Originally Posted by wawaweewa

Originally Posted by Kal Ripped Ken

Originally Posted by repinqueens

Originally Posted by DAYTONA 5000

Originally Posted by repinqueens

you morons think the world will be better without Israel. See what happens when Iran has a bomb and starts messing with the whole middle east how it sees fit.
Despite what you may see on the propoganda....er news, the Israeli's are capable of taking care of themselves. And if they aren't, tough. Big fish eat little fish. Thats just the way the cookie crumbles.


oh word? big fish eat the little fish? So what was wrong with Israel being pushed into a war by enemies surrounding them, WINNING, and taking land (6 day war). It's been done since the dawn of time right? you win, you get the territory, you get to write history...

but no the world has a soft spot for getting at the Jewish people. It's comical that a country the size of NJ with like 8 million people is "bullying" the middle east..

and to whoever doesn't understand where Israel fits into Americas plans... they trade information, tactical strategy, U.S. could have bases there etc. and I'm sure so shady dealings as well. We are allies that's all there is to it. Israel is Americas little democracy in the middle east...

I've been to Israel and the mantra is "America needs Israel" not the other way around...
u.s funds israel with about 3 billion in military aid yearly
Egypt also gets $2b+ USD. The Saudi's, the Kuwaiti's, and the UAE's all get our money for their oil.
Both sides are played.


Both sides are invested with USD, but it doesn't take much to realize that U.S. is pro-Israel; regardless of funding.

That being said I don't believe Iran will do anything to provoke this any further. This is the Israel media (very good might I add) finding justificationfor a threat they have every right to feel. I just don't feel Iran is the threat people claim.

The policies of foreign affairs the last years have led to this
smh.gif
 
Originally Posted by kix4kix

Originally Posted by wawaweewa

Originally Posted by Kal Ripped Ken

Originally Posted by repinqueens

Originally Posted by DAYTONA 5000

Originally Posted by repinqueens

you morons think the world will be better without Israel. See what happens when Iran has a bomb and starts messing with the whole middle east how it sees fit.
Despite what you may see on the propoganda....er news, the Israeli's are capable of taking care of themselves. And if they aren't, tough. Big fish eat little fish. Thats just the way the cookie crumbles.


oh word? big fish eat the little fish? So what was wrong with Israel being pushed into a war by enemies surrounding them, WINNING, and taking land (6 day war). It's been done since the dawn of time right? you win, you get the territory, you get to write history...

but no the world has a soft spot for getting at the Jewish people. It's comical that a country the size of NJ with like 8 million people is "bullying" the middle east..

and to whoever doesn't understand where Israel fits into Americas plans... they trade information, tactical strategy, U.S. could have bases there etc. and I'm sure so shady dealings as well. We are allies that's all there is to it. Israel is Americas little democracy in the middle east...

I've been to Israel and the mantra is "America needs Israel" not the other way around...
u.s funds israel with about 3 billion in military aid yearly
Egypt also gets $2b+ USD. The Saudi's, the Kuwaiti's, and the UAE's all get our money for their oil.
Both sides are played.


Both sides are invested with USD, but it doesn't take a genius to realize that U.S. is pro-Israel; regardless of funding.

That being said I don't believe Iran will do anything to provoke this any further. This is the Israel media (very good might I add) finding justification for a threat they have every right to feel. I just don't feel Iran is the threat people claim.

It's not at all. When I tell people that Iran is on the verge of collapse they
eyes.gif
. People think things are bad here?
laugh.gif
Iranians would tradeour woes for theirs in an instant. Ahmednijad (sp?) is worse than George Bush, the conservative Islam beliefs are not flying with the new generation and theireconomic problems are sorry.
 
Iran can make one little nuke? So what. Not like it will ever be fully functional to do any real damage.

Dont ya all know? US Navy Fleets FTW

*!$@ IRAN

SHIP_Battleship_Iowa_Front_Firing_lg.jpg
 
Israel is key in protecting U.S special interests (i.e oil, oil, foothold in the region... oil.) Without Israel the U.S has no leverage in the middle east andwill no longer be able to exploit natural resources of the arab lands.

That is why Ahmadinejad has made the comments that he has. He is sick of his people being exploited as would you if the chinese came to north america andestablished bases in Canada and Mexico and their militarily outpowered the united states what would you resort to doing? ANYTHING YOU COULD AND YOU WOULDRESENT THE CHINESE AS MUCH AS A MAN COULD.
 
While I do agree a much stronger tone needs to be taken, at this time, war is not the answer.
And with the Democrats in power, it is pretty sure that there will be no war.
 
Originally Posted by kash55

While I do agree a much stronger tone needs to be taken, at this time, war is not the answer.
And with the Democrats in power, it is pretty sure that there will be no war.
simply because the democrats are in power doesn't mean no more wars will be made. they want to leave and send troops to afghanistan andfurther down the line I wouldnt be surprised if they sent US troops into northern Pakistan. prompting the Pakistanis to fight and keep their sovereignty asthey have said they will in september ("shoot american soldiers on sight on their side of the border")
I dont think a military action against any of these countries can happen but it is very very possible.
 
"Several experts said that was enough for a bomb, but they cautioned that the milestone was mostly symbolic, because Iran would have to take additionalsteps. Not only would it have to breach its international agreements and kick out the inspectors, but it would also have to further purify the fuel and put itinto a warhead design - a technical advance that Western experts are unsure Iran has yet achieved."


Thats the important thing from the article. They just have the raw materials. Thats like saying any country with plutonium within their borders has enough tomake a bomb. Purifying it and turning it into a bomb is a whole other issue.
 
Originally Posted by MarTdiZzle23

Originally Posted by TBONE95860

[font=ARIAL,VERDANA,HELVETICA][size=+7]
112008_irannukes.jpg
[/size][/font]
Israel knows they can't handle a nuclear Iran but the entire reason for these confrontations is because of their apartheid/ persecution/ genocide in palestine


How many nukes does Israel have? I'll tell you that it's more than one.
 
Originally Posted by TBONE95860

[font=ARIAL,VERDANA,HELVETICA][size=+7]
112008_irannukes.jpg

'ENOUGH FOR ONE ATOM BOMB'
[/size][/font]



Iran Moves Closer To Nuclear Weapon
American Spectator - 1 hour ago
By Philip Klein on 11.20.08 @ 8:40AM Iran has now produced roughly enough nuclear material to make, with added purification, a single atom bomb, ...
'Iran has enough fissile material for one nuclear weapon' Jerusalem Post
Iran Has Enough Low-Level Uranium for Work on Bomb (Update1) Bloomberg
IAEA: Iran continues uranium enrichment Xinhua
Jewish Telegraphic Agency - Global Security Newswire
all 698 news articles »


[table][tr][td]
Barak Urges US to Focus on Iran Nuclear Threat (Update1)
Bloomberg - 1 hour ago
The US and its European Union allies, who accuse Iran of using its nuclear energy program as a cover for developing a weapon, are pressing for a fourth ...
Barak: West must reconcile with Russia, China to unite against Iran Ha'aretz
Israel urges united front against Iran PRESS TV
all 5 news articles »
[/td] [/tr][/table][font=ARIAL,VERDANA,HELVETICA][size=+7]
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/20/world/middleeast/20nuke.html?_r=1&hp&oref=sloginhttp://www.nytimes.com/20...=1&hp&oref=slogin

[/size][/font]

[h1]Iran Said to Have Nuclear Fuel for One Weapon[/h1]
Iran has now produced roughly enough nuclear material to make, with added purification, a single atom bomb, according to nuclear experts analyzing the latest report from global atomic inspectors.

The figures detailing Iran's progress were contained in a routine update on Wednesday from the International Atomic Energy Agency, which has been conducting inspections of the country's main nuclear plant at Natanz. The report concluded that as of early this month, Iran had made 630 kilograms, or about 1,390 pounds, of low-enriched uranium.

Several experts said that was enough for a bomb, but they cautioned that the milestone was mostly symbolic, because Iran would have to take additional steps. Not only would it have to breach its international agreements and kick out the inspectors, but it would also have to further purify the fuel and put it into a warhead design - a technical advance that Western experts are unsure Iran has yet achieved.

"They clearly have enough material for a bomb," said Richard L. Garwin, a top nuclear physicist who helped invent the hydrogen bomb and has advised Washington for decades. "They know how to do the enrichment. Whether they know how to design a bomb, well, that's another matter."

Iran insists that it wants only to fuel reactors for nuclear power. But many Western nations, led by the United States, suspect that its real goal is to gain the ability to make nuclear weapons.

While some Iranian officials have threatened to bar inspectors in the past, the country has made no such moves, and many experts inside the Bush administration and the I.A.E.A. believe it will avoid the risk of attempting "nuclear breakout" until it possessed a larger uranium supply.

Even so, for President-elect Barack Obama, the report underscores the magnitude of the problem that he will inherit Jan. 20: an Iranian nuclear program that has not only solved many technical problems of uranium enrichment, but that can also now credibly claim to possess enough material to make a weapon if negotiations with Europe and the United States break down.

American intelligence agencies have said Iran could make a bomb between 2009 and 2015. A national intelligence estimate made public late last year concluded that around the end of 2003, after long effort, Iran had halted work on an actual weapon. But enriching uranium, and obtaining enough material to build a weapon, is considered the most difficult part of the process.

Siegfried S. Hecker of Stanford University and a former director of the Los Alamos weapons laboratory said the growing size of the Iranian stockpile "underscored that they are marching down the path to developing the nuclear weapons option."

In the report to its board, the atomic agency said Iran's main enrichment plant was now feeding uranium into about 3,800 centrifuges - machines that spin incredibly fast to enrich the element into nuclear fuel. That count is the same as in the agency's last quarterly report, in September. Iran began installing the centrifuges in early 2007. But the new report's total of 630 kilograms - an increase of about 150 - shows that Iran has been making progress in accumulating material to make nuclear fuel.

That uranium has been enriched to the low levels needed to fuel a nuclear reactor. To further purify it to the highly enriched state needed to fuel a nuclear warhead, Iran would have to reconfigure its centrifuges and do a couple months of additional processing, nuclear experts said.

"They have a weapon's worth," Thomas B. Cochran, a senior scientist in the nuclear program of the Natural Resources Defense Council, a private group in Washington that tracks atomic arsenals, said in an interview.

He said the amount was suitable for a relatively advanced implosion-type weapon like the one dropped on Nagasaki. Its core, he added, would be about the size of a grapefruit. He said a cruder design would require about twice as much weapon-grade fuel.

"It's a virtual milestone," Dr. Cochran said of Iran's stockpile. It is not an imminent threat, he added, because the further technical work to make fuel for a bomb would tip off inspectors, the United States and other powers about "where they're going."

The agency's report made no mention of the possible military implications of the size of Iran's stockpile. And some experts said the milestone was still months away. In an analysis of the I.A.E.A. report, the Institute for Science and International Security, a private group in Washington, estimated that Iran had not yet reached the mark but would "within a few months." It added that other analysts estimated it might take as much as a year.

Whatever the exact date, it added, "Iran is progressing" toward the ability to quickly make enough weapon-grade uranium for a warhead.

Peter D. Zimmerman, a physicist and former United States government arms scientist, cautioned that the Iranian stockpile fell slightly short of what international officials conservatively estimate as the minimum threatening amount of nuclear fuel. "They're very close," he said of the Iranians in an interview. "If it isn't tomorrow, it's soon," probably a matter of months.

In its report, the I.A.E.A., which is based in Vienna, said Iran was working hard to roughly double its number of operating centrifuges.

A senior European diplomat close to the agency said Iran might have 6,000 centrifuges enriching uranium by the end of the year. The report also said Iran had said it intended to start installing another group of 3,000 centrifuges early next year.

The atomic energy agency said Iran was continuing to evade questions about its suspected work on nuclear warheads. In a separate report released Wednesday, the agency said, as expected, that it had found ambiguous traces of uranium at a suspected Syrian reactor site bombed by Israel last year.

"While it cannot be excluded that the building in question was intended for non-nuclear use," the report said, the building's features "along with the connectivity of the site to adequate pumping capacity of cooling water, are similar to what may be found in connection with a reactor site." Syria has said the uranium came from Israeli bombs.

So if the press wrote unicorns are plotting world destruction you will believe it?
roll.gif


The Media and their universal mind control, gotta love it
roll.gif
roll.gif
 
Having you dudes learned anything about the Middle East by now?? Just let Israel deal with Iran and leave it at that.
 
Originally Posted by Isiah Heaven

Originally Posted by TBONE95860

[font=ARIAL,VERDANA,HELVETICA][size=+7]
112008_irannukes.jpg

'ENOUGH FOR ONE ATOM BOMB'
[/size][/font]



Iran Moves Closer To Nuclear Weapon
American Spectator - 1 hour ago
By Philip Klein on 11.20.08 @ 8:40AM Iran has now produced roughly enough nuclear material to make, with added purification, a single atom bomb, ...
'Iran has enough fissile material for one nuclear weapon' Jerusalem Post
Iran Has Enough Low-Level Uranium for Work on Bomb (Update1) Bloomberg
IAEA: Iran continues uranium enrichment Xinhua
Jewish Telegraphic Agency - Global Security Newswire
all 698 news articles »


[table][tr][td]
Barak Urges US to Focus on Iran Nuclear Threat (Update1)
Bloomberg - 1 hour ago
The US and its European Union allies, who accuse Iran of using its nuclear energy program as a cover for developing a weapon, are pressing for a fourth ...
Barak: West must reconcile with Russia, China to unite against Iran Ha'aretz
Israel urges united front against Iran PRESS TV
all 5 news articles »
[/td] [/tr][/table][font=ARIAL,VERDANA,HELVETICA][size=+7]
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/20/world/middleeast/20nuke.html?_r=1&hp&oref=sloginhttp://www.nytimes.com/20...=1&hp&oref=sloginhttp://www.nytimes.com/20...=1&hp&oref=slogin

[/size][/font]

[h1]Iran Said to Have Nuclear Fuel for One Weapon[/h1]
Iran has now produced roughly enough nuclear material to make, with added purification, a single atom bomb, according to nuclear experts analyzing the latest report from global atomic inspectors.

The figures detailing Iran's progress were contained in a routine update on Wednesday from the International Atomic Energy Agency, which has been conducting inspections of the country's main nuclear plant at Natanz. The report concluded that as of early this month, Iran had made 630 kilograms, or about 1,390 pounds, of low-enriched uranium.

Several experts said that was enough for a bomb, but they cautioned that the milestone was mostly symbolic, because Iran would have to take additional steps. Not only would it have to breach its international agreements and kick out the inspectors, but it would also have to further purify the fuel and put it into a warhead design - a technical advance that Western experts are unsure Iran has yet achieved.

"They clearly have enough material for a bomb," said Richard L. Garwin, a top nuclear physicist who helped invent the hydrogen bomb and has advised Washington for decades. "They know how to do the enrichment. Whether they know how to design a bomb, well, that's another matter."

Iran insists that it wants only to fuel reactors for nuclear power. But many Western nations, led by the United States, suspect that its real goal is to gain the ability to make nuclear weapons.

While some Iranian officials have threatened to bar inspectors in the past, the country has made no such moves, and many experts inside the Bush administration and the I.A.E.A. believe it will avoid the risk of attempting "nuclear breakout" until it possessed a larger uranium supply.

Even so, for President-elect Barack Obama, the report underscores the magnitude of the problem that he will inherit Jan. 20: an Iranian nuclear program that has not only solved many technical problems of uranium enrichment, but that can also now credibly claim to possess enough material to make a weapon if negotiations with Europe and the United States break down.

American intelligence agencies have said Iran could make a bomb between 2009 and 2015. A national intelligence estimate made public late last year concluded that around the end of 2003, after long effort, Iran had halted work on an actual weapon. But enriching uranium, and obtaining enough material to build a weapon, is considered the most difficult part of the process.

Siegfried S. Hecker of Stanford University and a former director of the Los Alamos weapons laboratory said the growing size of the Iranian stockpile "underscored that they are marching down the path to developing the nuclear weapons option."

In the report to its board, the atomic agency said Iran's main enrichment plant was now feeding uranium into about 3,800 centrifuges - machines that spin incredibly fast to enrich the element into nuclear fuel. That count is the same as in the agency's last quarterly report, in September. Iran began installing the centrifuges in early 2007. But the new report's total of 630 kilograms - an increase of about 150 - shows that Iran has been making progress in accumulating material to make nuclear fuel.

That uranium has been enriched to the low levels needed to fuel a nuclear reactor. To further purify it to the highly enriched state needed to fuel a nuclear warhead, Iran would have to reconfigure its centrifuges and do a couple months of additional processing, nuclear experts said.

"They have a weapon's worth," Thomas B. Cochran, a senior scientist in the nuclear program of the Natural Resources Defense Council, a private group in Washington that tracks atomic arsenals, said in an interview.

He said the amount was suitable for a relatively advanced implosion-type weapon like the one dropped on Nagasaki. Its core, he added, would be about the size of a grapefruit. He said a cruder design would require about twice as much weapon-grade fuel.

"It's a virtual milestone," Dr. Cochran said of Iran's stockpile. It is not an imminent threat, he added, because the further technical work to make fuel for a bomb would tip off inspectors, the United States and other powers about "where they're going."

The agency's report made no mention of the possible military implications of the size of Iran's stockpile. And some experts said the milestone was still months away. In an analysis of the I.A.E.A. report, the Institute for Science and International Security, a private group in Washington, estimated that Iran had not yet reached the mark but would "within a few months." It added that other analysts estimated it might take as much as a year.

Whatever the exact date, it added, "Iran is progressing" toward the ability to quickly make enough weapon-grade uranium for a warhead.

Peter D. Zimmerman, a physicist and former United States government arms scientist, cautioned that the Iranian stockpile fell slightly short of what international officials conservatively estimate as the minimum threatening amount of nuclear fuel. "They're very close," he said of the Iranians in an interview. "If it isn't tomorrow, it's soon," probably a matter of months.

In its report, the I.A.E.A., which is based in Vienna, said Iran was working hard to roughly double its number of operating centrifuges.

A senior European diplomat close to the agency said Iran might have 6,000 centrifuges enriching uranium by the end of the year. The report also said Iran had said it intended to start installing another group of 3,000 centrifuges early next year.

The atomic energy agency said Iran was continuing to evade questions about its suspected work on nuclear warheads. In a separate report released Wednesday, the agency said, as expected, that it had found ambiguous traces of uranium at a suspected Syrian reactor site bombed by Israel last year.

"While it cannot be excluded that the building in question was intended for non-nuclear use," the report said, the building's features "along with the connectivity of the site to adequate pumping capacity of cooling water, are similar to what may be found in connection with a reactor site." Syria has said the uranium came from Israeli bombs.

So if the press wrote unicorns are plotting world destruction you will believe it?
roll.gif


The Media and their universal mind control, gotta love it
roll.gif
roll.gif


Jerusalem Post....Bloomberg...Klein.... geez, I wonder why they would say that, some motivating factor that they all have in common. Damn, I just can'tfigure it out.
 
Originally Posted by I am Furby

Originally Posted by Isiah Heaven

Originally Posted by TBONE95860

[font=ARIAL,VERDANA,HELVETICA][size=+7]
112008_irannukes.jpg

'ENOUGH FOR ONE ATOM BOMB'
[/size][/font]



Iran Moves Closer To Nuclear Weapon
American Spectator - 1 hour ago
By Philip Klein on 11.20.08 @ 8:40AM Iran has now produced roughly enough nuclear material to make, with added purification, a single atom bomb, ...
'Iran has enough fissile material for one nuclear weapon' Jerusalem Post
Iran Has Enough Low-Level Uranium for Work on Bomb (Update1) Bloomberg
IAEA: Iran continues uranium enrichment Xinhua
Jewish Telegraphic Agency - Global Security Newswire
all 698 news articles »


[table][tr][td]
Barak Urges US to Focus on Iran Nuclear Threat (Update1)
Bloomberg - 1 hour ago
The US and its European Union allies, who accuse Iran of using its nuclear energy program as a cover for developing a weapon, are pressing for a fourth ...
Barak: West must reconcile with Russia, China to unite against Iran Ha'aretz
Israel urges united front against Iran PRESS TV
all 5 news articles »
[/td] [/tr][/table][font=ARIAL,VERDANA,HELVETICA][size=+7]
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/20/world/middleeast/20nuke.html?_r=1&hp&oref=sloginhttp://www.nytimes.com/20...=1&hp&oref=sloginhttp://www.nytimes.com/20...=1&hp&oref=sloginhttp://www.nytimes.com/20...=1&hp&oref=slogin

[/size][/font]

[h1]Iran Said to Have Nuclear Fuel for One Weapon[/h1]
Iran has now produced roughly enough nuclear material to make, with added purification, a single atom bomb, according to nuclear experts analyzing the latest report from global atomic inspectors.

The figures detailing Iran's progress were contained in a routine update on Wednesday from the International Atomic Energy Agency, which has been conducting inspections of the country's main nuclear plant at Natanz. The report concluded that as of early this month, Iran had made 630 kilograms, or about 1,390 pounds, of low-enriched uranium.

Several experts said that was enough for a bomb, but they cautioned that the milestone was mostly symbolic, because Iran would have to take additional steps. Not only would it have to breach its international agreements and kick out the inspectors, but it would also have to further purify the fuel and put it into a warhead design - a technical advance that Western experts are unsure Iran has yet achieved.

"They clearly have enough material for a bomb," said Richard L. Garwin, a top nuclear physicist who helped invent the hydrogen bomb and has advised Washington for decades. "They know how to do the enrichment. Whether they know how to design a bomb, well, that's another matter."

Iran insists that it wants only to fuel reactors for nuclear power. But many Western nations, led by the United States, suspect that its real goal is to gain the ability to make nuclear weapons.

While some Iranian officials have threatened to bar inspectors in the past, the country has made no such moves, and many experts inside the Bush administration and the I.A.E.A. believe it will avoid the risk of attempting "nuclear breakout" until it possessed a larger uranium supply.

Even so, for President-elect Barack Obama, the report underscores the magnitude of the problem that he will inherit Jan. 20: an Iranian nuclear program that has not only solved many technical problems of uranium enrichment, but that can also now credibly claim to possess enough material to make a weapon if negotiations with Europe and the United States break down.

American intelligence agencies have said Iran could make a bomb between 2009 and 2015. A national intelligence estimate made public late last year concluded that around the end of 2003, after long effort, Iran had halted work on an actual weapon. But enriching uranium, and obtaining enough material to build a weapon, is considered the most difficult part of the process.

Siegfried S. Hecker of Stanford University and a former director of the Los Alamos weapons laboratory said the growing size of the Iranian stockpile "underscored that they are marching down the path to developing the nuclear weapons option."

In the report to its board, the atomic agency said Iran's main enrichment plant was now feeding uranium into about 3,800 centrifuges - machines that spin incredibly fast to enrich the element into nuclear fuel. That count is the same as in the agency's last quarterly report, in September. Iran began installing the centrifuges in early 2007. But the new report's total of 630 kilograms - an increase of about 150 - shows that Iran has been making progress in accumulating material to make nuclear fuel.

That uranium has been enriched to the low levels needed to fuel a nuclear reactor. To further purify it to the highly enriched state needed to fuel a nuclear warhead, Iran would have to reconfigure its centrifuges and do a couple months of additional processing, nuclear experts said.

"They have a weapon's worth," Thomas B. Cochran, a senior scientist in the nuclear program of the Natural Resources Defense Council, a private group in Washington that tracks atomic arsenals, said in an interview.

He said the amount was suitable for a relatively advanced implosion-type weapon like the one dropped on Nagasaki. Its core, he added, would be about the size of a grapefruit. He said a cruder design would require about twice as much weapon-grade fuel.

"It's a virtual milestone," Dr. Cochran said of Iran's stockpile. It is not an imminent threat, he added, because the further technical work to make fuel for a bomb would tip off inspectors, the United States and other powers about "where they're going."

The agency's report made no mention of the possible military implications of the size of Iran's stockpile. And some experts said the milestone was still months away. In an analysis of the I.A.E.A. report, the Institute for Science and International Security, a private group in Washington, estimated that Iran had not yet reached the mark but would "within a few months." It added that other analysts estimated it might take as much as a year.

Whatever the exact date, it added, "Iran is progressing" toward the ability to quickly make enough weapon-grade uranium for a warhead.

Peter D. Zimmerman, a physicist and former United States government arms scientist, cautioned that the Iranian stockpile fell slightly short of what international officials conservatively estimate as the minimum threatening amount of nuclear fuel. "They're very close," he said of the Iranians in an interview. "If it isn't tomorrow, it's soon," probably a matter of months.

In its report, the I.A.E.A., which is based in Vienna, said Iran was working hard to roughly double its number of operating centrifuges.

A senior European diplomat close to the agency said Iran might have 6,000 centrifuges enriching uranium by the end of the year. The report also said Iran had said it intended to start installing another group of 3,000 centrifuges early next year.

The atomic energy agency said Iran was continuing to evade questions about its suspected work on nuclear warheads. In a separate report released Wednesday, the agency said, as expected, that it had found ambiguous traces of uranium at a suspected Syrian reactor site bombed by Israel last year.

"While it cannot be excluded that the building in question was intended for non-nuclear use," the report said, the building's features "along with the connectivity of the site to adequate pumping capacity of cooling water, are similar to what may be found in connection with a reactor site." Syria has said the uranium came from Israeli bombs.

So if the press wrote unicorns are plotting world destruction you will believe it?
roll.gif


The Media and their universal mind control, gotta love it
roll.gif
roll.gif


Jerusalem Post....Bloomberg...Klein.... geez, I wonder why they would say that, some motivating factor that they all have in common. Damn, I just can't figure it out.
indifferent.gif
 
i feel safe with bush in office cuz at least hes blowin whatever up, but once the 20th comes, we got an untested leader who will probably have to deal withthis ... smh
 
Originally Posted by MarleysProtege

i feel safe with bush in office cuz at least hes blowin whatever up, but once the 20th comes, we got an untested leader who will probably have to deal with this ... smh

Can you remind me who was the President on the day of 9/11?? While America was being hit by the biggest terrorist plot ever there was an untested leader thatday that was barely able to read a Dr. Suess book when he was informed that America was being attacked.
 
Back
Top Bottom